Efficient electrically powered CO2-to-ethanol via suppression of deoxygenation

Abstract

The carbon dioxide electroreduction reaction (CO2RR) provides ways to produce ethanol but its Faradaic efficiency could be further improved, especially in CO2RR studies reported at a total current density exceeding 10 mA cm−2. Here we report a class of catalysts that achieve an ethanol Faradaic efficiency of (52 ± 1)% and an ethanol cathodic energy efficiency of 31%. We exploit the fact that suppression of the deoxygenation of the intermediate HOCCH* to ethylene promotes ethanol production, and hence that confinement using capping layers having strong electron-donating ability on active catalysts promotes C–C coupling and increases the reaction energy of HOCCH* deoxygenation. Thus, we have developed an electrocatalyst with confined reaction volume by coating Cu catalysts with nitrogen-doped carbon. Spectroscopy suggests that the strong electron-donating ability and confinement of the nitrogen-doped carbon layers leads to the observed pronounced selectivity towards ethanol.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: DFT calculations.
Fig. 2: Structural and compositional analyses of the 34% N-C/Cu catalyst on PTFE.
Fig. 3: CO2RR performance comparisons.
Fig. 4: In situ Raman and XAS characterization.

Data availability

The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper, Supplementary Information and Source Data files.

References

  1. 1.

    Jhong, H.-R., Ma, S. & Kenis, P. J. A. Electrochemical conversion of CO2 to useful chemicals: current status, remaining challenges, and future opportunities. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 2, 191–199 (2013).

  2. 2.

    Hori, Y. Electrochemical CO2 reduction on metal electrodes. In Modern Aspects of Electrochemistry (eds Vayenas, C. G., White, R. E. & Gamboa-Aldeco, M. E.) Vol. 42, Ch. 3 (Springer, 2008).

  3. 3.

    Qiao, J., Liu, Y., Hong, F. & Zhang, J. A review of catalysts for the electroreduction of carbon dioxide to produce low-carbon fuels. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 631–675 (2014).

  4. 4.

    Zhou, Y. et al. Dopant-induced electron localization drives CO2 reduction to C2 hydrocarbons. Nat. Chem. 19, 974–980 (2018).

  5. 5.

    Ren, R. et al. Molecular electrocatalysts can mediate fast, selective CO2 reduction in a flow cell. Science 365, 367–369 (2019).

  6. 6.

    Dinh, C.-T. et al. CO2 electroreduction to ethylene via hydroxide-mediated copper catalysis at an abrupt interface. Science 360, 783–787 (2018).

  7. 7.

    Xia, C. et al. Continuous production of pure liquid fuel solutions via electrocatalytic CO2 reduction using solid-electrolyte devices. Nat. Energy 4, 776–785 (2019).

  8. 8.

    Jouny, M., Luc, W. & Jiao, F. General techno-economic analysis of CO2 electrolysis systems. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 57, 2165–2177 (2018).

  9. 9.

    Global Ethanol Market: Advancement In Production Technologies To Boost Market, Notes TMR (Transparency Market Research, 2018); www.transparencymarketresearch.com/pressrelease/ethanol-market.htm.

  10. 10.

    Lum, Y., Cheng, T., Goddard, W. A. & Ager, J. W. Electrochemical CO reduction builds solvent water into oxygenate products. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 9337–9340 (2018).

  11. 11.

    Cheng, T., Xiao, H. & Goddard, W. A. Full atomistic reaction mechanism with kinetics for CO reduction on Cu(100) from ab initio molecular dynamics free-energy calculations at 298 K. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 1795–1800 (2017).

  12. 12.

    Hoang, T. T. H. et al. Nanoporous copper-silver alloys by additive-controlled electrodeposition for the selective electroreduction of CO2 to ethylene and ethanol. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 5791–5797 (2018).

  13. 13.

    Zhuang, T.-T. et al. Steering post-C–C coupling selectivity enables high efficiency electroreduction of carbon dioxide to multi-carbon alcohols. Nat. Catal. 1, 421–428 (2018).

  14. 14.

    Wu, J. et al. A metal-free electrocatalyst for carbon dioxide reduction to multi-carbon hydrocarbons and oxygenates. Nat. Commun. 7, 13869 (2016).

  15. 15.

    Hoang, T. T. H., Ma, S., Gold, J. I., Kenis, P. J. A. & Gewirth, A. A. Nanoporous copper films by additive-controlled electrodeposition: CO2 reduction catalysis. ACS Catal. 7, 3313–3321 (2017).

  16. 16.

    Li, F. et al. Cooperative CO2-to-ethanol conversion via enriched intermediates at molecule–metal catalyst interfaces. Nat. Catal. 3, 75–82 (2020).

  17. 17.

    Li, H., Xiao, J., Fu, Q. & Bao, X. Confined catalysis under two-dimensional materials. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 5930–5934 (2017).

  18. 18.

    Qiang, F. & Bao, X. Surface chemistry and catalysis confined under two-dimensional materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 1842–1874 (2017).

  19. 19.

    Zicovich-Wilson, C., Corma, A. & Viruela, P. Electronic confinement of molecules in microscopic pores. A new concept which contributes to the explanation of the catalytic activity of zeolites. J. Phys. Chem. 98, 10863–10870 (1994).

  20. 20.

    Yang, F., Deng, D., Pan, X., Fu, Q. & Bao, X. Understanding nano effects in catalysis. Natl Sci. Rev. 2, 183–201 (2015).

  21. 21.

    Calle-Vallejo, F. & Koper, M. T. M. Theoretical considerations on the electroreduction of CO to C2 species on Cu(100) electrodes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 7282–7285 (2013).

  22. 22.

    Kumar, B. et al. Renewable and metal-free carbon nanofiber catalysts for carbon dioxide reduction. Nat. Commun. 4, 2918 (2013).

  23. 23.

    Krivanek, O. L. et al. Atom-by-atom structural and chemical analysis by annular dark-field electron microscopy. Nature 464, 571–574 (2010).

  24. 24.

    Zhuang, T.-T. et al. Copper nanocavities confine intermediates for efficient electrosynthesis of C3 alcohol fuels from carbon monoxide. Nat. Catal. 1, 946–951 (2018).

  25. 25.

    Kortlever, R., Shen, J., Schouten, K. J. P., Calle-Vallejo, F. & Koper, M. T. M. Catalysts and reaction pathways for the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 4073–4082 (2015).

  26. 26.

    Montoya, J. H., Shi, C., Chan, K. & Nørskov, J. K. Theoretical insights into a CO dimerization mechanism in CO2. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 2032–2037 (2015).

  27. 27.

    Chernyshova, I., Somasundaran, P. & Ponnurangam, S. On the origin of the elusive first intermediate of CO2 electroreduction. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E9261–E9270 (2018).

  28. 28.

    Akemann, W. & Otto, A. Vibrational modes of CO adsorbed on disordered copper films. J. Raman Spectrosc. 22, 797–803 (1991).

  29. 29.

    Gunathunge, C. M. et al. Spectroscopic observation of reversible surface reconstruction of copper electrodes under CO2 reduction. J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 12337–12344 (2017).

  30. 30.

    Sheppard, N. & Nguyen, T. T. in Advances in Infrared and Raman Spectroscopy (eds Clark, R. J. H. & Hester, R. E.) Vol. 5 (Heyden, 1978).

  31. 31.

    Fielicke, A., Gruene, P., Meijer, G. & Rayner, D. M. The adsorption of CO on transition metal clusters: a case study of cluster surface chemistry. Surf. Sci. 603, 1427–1433 (2009).

  32. 32.

    Sandberg, R. B., Montoya, J. H., Chan, K. & Nørskov, J. K. CO-CO coupling on Cu facets: coverage, strain and field effects. Surf. Sci. 654, 56–62 (2016).

  33. 33.

    Li, J. et al. Copper adparticle enabled selective electrosynthesis of n-propanol. Nat. Commun. 9, 4614 (2018).

  34. 34.

    Huan, T. N. et al. From molecular copper complexes to composite electrocatalytic materials for selective reduction of CO2 to formic acid. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 3901–3907 (2015).

  35. 35.

    Liu, G., Li, X., Ganesan, P. & Popov, B. N. Development of non-precious metal oxygen-reduction catalysts for PEM fuel cells based on N-doped ordered porous carbon. Appl. Catal. B 93, 156–165 (2009).

  36. 36.

    Li, J. et al. Unraveling the origin of visible light capture by core–shell TiO2 nanotubes. Chem. Mater. 28, 4467–4475 (2016).

  37. 37.

    Niwa, H. et al. X-ray absorption analysis of nitrogen contribution to oxygen reduction reaction in carbon alloy cathode catalysts for polymer electrolyte fuel cells. J. Power Sources 187, 93–97 (2009).

  38. 38.

    Luc, W., Rosen, J. & Jiao, F. An Ir-based anode for a practical CO2 electrolyzer. Catal. Today 288, 79–84 (2017).

  39. 39.

    Ravel, B. & Newville, M. ATHENA, ARTEMIS, HEPHAESTUS: data analysis for X-ray absorption spectroscopy using IFEFFIT. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 12, 537–541 (2005).

  40. 40.

    Jan, I. Nika: software for two-dimensional data reduction. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 45, 324–328 (2012).

  41. 41.

    Urbain, F. et al. A prototype reactor for highly selective solar-driven CO2 reduction to synthesis gas using nanosized Earth-abundant catalysts and silicon photovoltaics. Energy Environ. Sci. 10, 2256–2266 (2017).

  42. 42.

    Baturina, O. A. et al. CO2 electroreduction to hydrocarbons on carbon-supported Cu nanoparticles. ACS Catal. 4, 3682–3695 (2014).

  43. 43.

    Kuhl, K. P., Cave, E. R., Abram, D. N. & Jaramillo, T. F. New insights into the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide on metallic copper surfaces. Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 7050–7059 (2012).

  44. 44.

    Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).

  45. 45.

    Kresse, G. & Furthmuller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comp. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).

  46. 46.

    Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal amorphous-semiconductor transition in germanium. Phys. Rev. B 49, 14251–14269 (1994).

  47. 47.

    Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys. Rev. B 47, 558–561 (1993).

  48. 48.

    Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).

  49. 49.

    Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999).

  50. 50.

    Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994).

  51. 51.

    Grimme, S., Antony, J., Ehrlich, S. & Krieg, H. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 132, 154104 (2010).

  52. 52.

    Michaelides, A. et al. Identification of general linear relationships between activation energies and enthalpy changes for dissociation reactions at surfaces. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 3704–3705 (2003).

  53. 53.

    Liu, Z. P. & Hu, P. General rules for predicting where a catalytic reaction should occur on metal surfaces: a density functional theory study of C-H and C-O bond breaking/making on flat, stepped, and kinked metal surfaces. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 1958–1967 (2003).

  54. 54.

    Alavi, A., Hu, P. J., Deutsch, T., Silvestrelli, P. L. & Hutter, J. CO oxidation on Pt(111): an ab initio density functional theory study. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3650–3653 (1998).

  55. 55.

    Montoya, J. H., Shi, C., Chan, K. & Nørskov, J. K. Theoretical insights into a CO dimerization mechanism in CO2 electroreduction. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 2032–2037 (2015).

  56. 56.

    Deringer, V. L. et al. Computational surface chemistry of tetrahedral amorphous carbon by combining machine learning and density functional theory. Chem. Mater. 30, 7438–7445 (2018).

  57. 57.

    Gupta, N., Gattrell, M. & MacDougall, B. Calculation for the cathode surface concentrations in the electrochemical reduction of CO2 in KHCO3 solutions. J. Appl. Electrochem. 36, 161–172 (2006).

  58. 58.

    Burdyny, T. et al. Nanomorphology-enhanced gas-evolution intensifies CO2 reduction electrochemistry. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 5, 4031–4040 (2017).

  59. 59.

    Wiesenburg, D. A. & Guinasso, N. L. J. Equilibrium solubilities of methane, carbon monoxide, and hydrogen in water and sea water. Chem. Eng. Data 24, 356–360 (1979).

  60. 60.

    Linstrom, P. J. & Mallard, W. G. NIST Chemistry WebBook NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69 (NIST, 2018); https://doi.org/10.18434/T4D303.

  61. 61.

    Schumpe, A. & Weisenberger, S. Estimation of gas solubilities in salt solutions at temperatures from 273 K to 363 K. AIChE J. 42, 298–300 (1996).

  62. 62.

    Millero, F. J., Graham, T. B., Huang, F., Bustos-Serrano, H. & Pierrot, D. Dissociation constants of carbonic acid in seawater as a function of salinity and temperature. Mar. Chem. 100, 80–94 (2006).

  63. 63.

    Schulz, K. G., Riebesell, U., Rost, B., Thoms, S. & Zeebe, R. E. Determination of the rate constants for the carbon dioxide to bicarbonate inter-conversion in pH-buffered seawater systems. Mar. Chem. 100, 53–65 (2006).

  64. 64.

    Millero, F. J. & Rabindra, N. R. A chemical equilibrium model for the carbonate system in natural waters. Croat. Chem. Acta 70, 1–38 (1997).

  65. 65.

    Mehrbach, C., Culberson, C. H., Hawley, J. E. & Pytkowicx, R. M. Measurement of the apparent dissociation constants of carbonic acid in seawater at atmospheric pressure. Limnol. Oceanogr. 18, 897–907 (1973).

  66. 66.

    Vanysek, P. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (CRC Press, 1993).

  67. 67.

    Raciti, D., Mao, M. & Wang, C. Mass transport modelling for the electroreduction of CO2 on Cu nanowires. Nanotechnology 29, 044001 (2017).

  68. 68.

    Sacco, A., Zeng, J., Bejtka, K. & Chiodoni, A. Modeling of gas bubble-induced mass transport in the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide on nanostructured electrodes. J. Catal. 372, 39–48 (2019).

  69. 69.

    Newman, J. & Thomas-Alyea, K. E. Electrochemical Systems (John Wiley & Sons, 2004).

  70. 70.

    Bernardi, D. M. & Verbrugge, M. W. Mathematical model of a gas diffusion electrode bonded to a polymer electrolyte. AIChE J. 37, 1151–1163 (1991).

  71. 71.

    Das, P. K., Li, X. & Liu, Z.-S. Effective transport coefficients in PEM fuel cell catalyst and gas diffusion layers: beyond Bruggeman approximation. Appl. Energy 87, 2785–2796 (2010).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Suncor Energy, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada, and the CIFAR Bio-Inspired Solar Energy programme. Synchrotron measurements were carried out at the Advanced Photon Source, an Office of Science User Facility operated for the US DOE Office of Science by Argonne National Laboratory, and was supported by the US DOE under contract number DE-AC02-06CH11357, the Canadian Light Source and its funding partners, and the CMS beamline of the National Synchrotron Light Source II, a US DOE Office of the Science User Facility operated for the DOE Office of Science by Brookhaven National Laboratory. This research also used resources of the Advanced Light Source, which is a DOE Office of Science User Facility under contract number DE-AC02-05CH1123, as well as the sources of the Canadian Light Source. The focused ion beam analyses and some of the TEM/STEM and SEM analyses were carried out at the CFI-funded Ontario Centre for the Characterization of Advanced Materials at the University of Toronto. STEM measurements and EELS mapping were performed at the Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, which is a user facility supported by the US DOE BES. M.C. is supported by the US DOE BES, Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences Division, Catalysis Science Program. All DFT calculations were performed on the IBM BlueGene/Q supercomputer with support from the Southern Ontario Smart Computing Innovation Platform (SOSCIP) and Niagara supercomputer at the SciNet HPC Consortium. SOSCIP is funded by the Federal Economic Development Agency of Southern Ontario, the Province of Ontario, IBM Canada Ltd., Ontario Centres of Excellence, Mitacs and 15 Ontario academic member institutions. SciNet is funded by the Canada Foundation for Innovation, the Government of Ontario, Ontario Research Fund - Research Excellence and the University of Toronto. We thank T. Wu, Y. Z. Finfrock, L. Ma and G. Sterbinsky for technical support at the 9BM beamline of the Advanced Photon Source. D.S. acknowledges the NSERC E. W. R. Steacie Memorial Fellowship. J.L. acknowledges the Banting Postdoctoral Fellowships Program. We thank M. Wei from the University of Toronto for discussions and help.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

E.H.S. supervised the project. X.W. designed and carried out the experiments, analysed the data and wrote the paper. Z.W. carried out DFT simulations and wrote the corresponding section. X.W. and A.O. carried out the MEA measurements. D.-H.N., Y.-S.L., F.L., Y.L. and S.-F.H. performed synchrotron X-ray spectroscopy measurements. Z.C. and M.C. conducted the preparation and characterization of STEM/TEM ultrathin slices of catalyst. B.C., J.T., J.Y.H. and B.S. conducted TEM characterizations. Y.W. and J.T. performed part of the SEM characterizations. J.W., A.P. and P.T. carried out XPS measurements. A.R.K. and L.J.R. carried out the WAXS measurements and analysed the WAXS data. C.M. carried out the local species concentration modelling. C.M.G. and C.P.O. provided help with the MEA measurements. F.P.G.d.A., C.-T.D., Y.C.L., J.L., T.-T.Z., M.L., Y.M., A.X., B. Stephen, B. Sun, A.H.I., S.O.K. and D.S. assisted with the discussions. A.R.K. is a guest researcher. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the preparation of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward H. Sargent.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

A patent application regarding confined electrocatalysis for CO2-to-ethanol is in preparation.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–50, Tables 1–14 and Refs. 1–10.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 3

Source Data for Fig. 3a, b, c, and d

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, X., Wang, Z., García de Arquer, F.P. et al. Efficient electrically powered CO2-to-ethanol via suppression of deoxygenation. Nat Energy (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-0607-8

Download citation