Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

Practical assessment of the performance of aluminium battery technologies

Nature Energy volume 6, pages 21–29 (2021)Cite this article

Subjects

An Author Correction to this article was published on 16 February 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

Aluminium-based battery technologies have been widely regarded as one of the most attractive options to drastically improve, and possibly replace, existing battery systems—mainly due to the possibility of achieving very high energy density with low cost. Many reports have demonstrated primary or rechargeable Al-based battery chemistries in both aqueous and non-aqueous electrolytes. However, the practical realization of these battery chemistries has been difficult over a long period of time (170 years). In fact, no Al-based battery has been shown with the required stability or touted energy density. Typically, the performance of Al-based batteries is overstated in the literature due to imprecise considerations that do not fairly evaluate practically achievable energy densities. Here we provide accurate calculations of the practically achievable cell-level capacity and energy density for Al-based cells (focusing on recent literature showing ‘high’ performance) and use the results to critically assess their future deployment.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Attractive properties and chemistries of Al as an anode material for use in AABs and AIBs.
Fig. 2: Evaluation of practical energy density and operational lifetime of Al anode batteries.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Albertus, P., Babinec, S., Litzelman, S. & Newman, A. Status and challenges in enabling the lithium metal electrode for high-energy and low-cost rechargeable batteries. Nat. Energy 3, 16–21 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ng, B. et al. Low-Temperature lithium plating/corrosion hazard in lithium-ion batteries: electrode rippling, variable states of charge, and thermal and nonthermal runaway. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 3, 3653–3664 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Faegh, E. et al. Understanding the dynamics of primary Zn-MnO2 alkaline battery gassing with operando visualization and pressure cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 165, A2528–A2535 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Benjamin, P. The Voltaic Cell: Its Construction and Its Capacity (Wiley, 1893).

  5. Heise, G. W., Schumacher, E. A. & Cahoon, N. A heavy duty chlorine‐depolarized cell. J. Electrochem. Soc. 94, 99–105 (1948).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gifford, P. & Palmisano, J. An aluminum/chlorine rechargeable cell employing a room temperature molten salt electrolyte. J. Electrochem. Soc. 135, 650–654 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jayaprakash, N., Das, S. & Archer, L. The rechargeable aluminum-ion battery. Chem. Commun. 47, 12610–12612 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ryu, J., Park, M. & Cho, J. Advanced technologies for high‐energy aluminum–air batteries. Adv. Mater. 31, 1804784 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ru, Y., Zheng, S., Xue, H. & Pang, H. Different positive electrode materials in organic and aqueous systems for aluminium ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 7, 14391–14418 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Faegh, E., Shrestha, S., Zhao, X. & Mustain, W. E. In-depth structural understanding of zinc oxide addition to alkaline electrolytes to protect aluminum against corrosion and gassing. J. Appl. Electrochem. 49, 895–907 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Faegh, E., Ng, B., Hayman, D. & Mustain, W. E. Design of highly reversible zinc anodes for aqueous batteries using preferentially oriented electrolytic zinc. Batter. Supercaps 3, 1220–1232 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen, L. D., Nørskov, J. K. & Luntz, A. C. Al–air batteries: fundamental thermodynamic limitations from first-principles theory. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 175–179 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Choi, S. et al. Shape‐reconfigurable aluminum–air batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 27, 1702244 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yu, Y. et al. Laser sintering of printed anodes for al-air batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 165, A584–A592 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, Y. et al. Liquid-free Al-air batteries with paper-based gel electrolyte: a green energy technology for portable electronics. J. Power Sources 437, 226896 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang, Y. et al. Parametric study and optimization of a low-cost paper-based Al-air battery with corrosion inhibition ability. Appl. Energy 251, 113342 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang, Y. et al. Combining Al-air battery with paper-making industry, a novel type of flexible primary battery technology. Electrochim. Acta 319, 947–957 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hopkins, B. J., Shao-Horn, Y. & Hart, D. P. Suppressing corrosion in primary aluminum–air batteries via oil displacement. Science 362, 658–661 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang, H. et al. The rechargeable aluminum battery: opportunities and challenges. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 11978–11996 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang, Y., Liu, S., Ji, Y., Ma, J. & Yu, H. Emerging Nonaqueous Aluminum‐Ion Batteries: Challenges, Status, and Perspectives. Adv. Mater. 30, 1706310 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu, T. et al. An overview and future perspectives of aqueous rechargeable polyvalent ion batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 18, 68–91 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bhauriyal, P., Mahata, A. & Pathak, B. The staging mechanism of AlCl 4 intercalation in a graphite electrode for an aluminium-ion battery. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19, 7980–7989 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kravchyk, K. V., Wang, S., Piveteau, L. & Kovalenko, M. V. Efficient aluminum chloride–natural graphite battery. Chem. Mater. 29, 4484–4492 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kravchyk, K. V., Seno, C. & Kovalenko, M. V. Limitations of Chloroaluminate Ionic Liquid Anolytes for Aluminum–Graphite Dual-Ion Batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 5, 545–549 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Elia, G. A., Kyeremateng, N. A., Marquardt, K. & Hahn, R. An aluminum/graphite battery with ultra‐high rate capability. Batter. Supercaps 2, 83–90 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lin, M.-C. et al. An ultrafast rechargeable aluminium-ion battery. Nature 520, 324 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sun, H. et al. A new aluminium-ion battery with high voltage, high safety and low cost. Chem. Commun. 51, 11892–11895 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen, H. et al. A defect‐free principle for advanced graphene cathode of aluminum‐ion battery. Adv. Mater. 29, 1605958 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang, D.-Y. et al. Advanced rechargeable aluminium ion battery with a high-quality natural graphite cathode. Nat. Commun. 8, 14283 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chen, H. et al. Ultrafast all-climate aluminum-graphene battery with quarter-million cycle life. Sci. Adv. 3, eaao7233 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yu, X., Wang, B., Gong, D., Xu, Z. & Lu, B. Graphene nanoribbons on highly porous 3D graphene for high‐capacity and ultrastable Al‐ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 29, 1604118 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kim, D. J. et al. Rechargeable aluminium organic batteries. Nat. Energy 4, 51 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. VahidMohammadi, A., Hadjikhani, A., Shahbazmohamadi, S. & Beidaghi, M. Two-dimensional vanadium carbide (MXene) as a high-capacity cathode material for rechargeable aluminum batteries. ACS nano 11, 11135–11144 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang, W. et al. A new cathode material for super-valent battery based on aluminium ion intercalation and deintercalation. Sci. Rep. 3, 3383 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yang, W. et al. Flexible free-standing MoS2/carbon nanofibers composite cathode for rechargeable aluminum-ion batteries. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 7, 4861–4867 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Li, H. et al. A highly reversible Co3S4 microsphere cathode material for aluminum-ion batteries. Nano Energy 56, 100–108 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang, P. et al. A flexible aqueous Al ion rechargeable full battery. Chem. Eng. J. 373, 580–586 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wang, S. et al. A novel ultrafast rechargeable multi‐ions battery. Adv. Mater. 29, 1606349 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Yuan, D., Zhao, J., Manalastas, W. Jr, Kumar, S. & Srinivasan, M. Emerging rechargeable aqueous aluminum ion battery: Status, challenges, and outlooks. Nano Mater. Sci. 2, 248–263 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang, P. et al. A high-performance flexible aqueous Al ion rechargeable battery with long cycle life. Energy Storage Mater. 25, 426–435 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Wu, C. et al. Electrochemically activated spinel manganese oxide for rechargeable aqueous aluminum battery. Nat. Commun. 10, 73 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhao, Q. et al. Solid electrolyte interphases for high-energy aqueous aluminum electrochemical cells. Sci. Adv. 4, eaau8131 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. He, S. et al. A high‐energy aqueous aluminum‐manganese battery. Adv. Funct. Mater. 29, 1905228 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Pan, W. et al. A low-cost and dendrite-free rechargeable aluminium-ion battery with superior performance. J. Mater. Chem. A 7, 17420–17425 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Zu, C.-X. & Li, H. Thermodynamic analysis on energy densities of batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 2614–2624 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Chao, D. et al. An electrolytic Zn–MnO2 battery for high‐voltage and scalable energy storage. Angew. Chem. In.t Ed. 58, 7823–7828 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Harlow, J. E. et al. A wide range of testing results on an excellent lithium-ion cell chemistry to be used as benchmarks for new battery technologies. J. Electrochem. Soc. 166, A3031–A3044 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Gelman, D., Shvartsev, B. & Ein-Eli, Y. Aluminum–air battery based on an ionic liquid electrolyte. J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 20237–20242 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Hu, Y. et al. A binder‐free and free‐standing cobalt sulfide@ carbon nanotube cathode material for aluminum‐ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 30, 1703824 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Xu, J. et al. Recent progress in graphite intercalation compounds for rechargeable metal (Li, Na, K, Al)‐ion batteries. Adv. Sci. 4, 1700146 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemical Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA

    Ehsan Faegh, Benjamin Ng, Dillon Hayman & William E. Mustain

Authors
  1. Ehsan Faegh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Benjamin Ng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dillon Hayman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. William E. Mustain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William E. Mustain.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Energy thanks Stanley Whittingham and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Faegh, E., Ng, B., Hayman, D. et al. Practical assessment of the performance of aluminium battery technologies. Nat Energy 6, 21–29 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-00728-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-00728-y

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing