While a government commission recently proposed to phase out coal in Germany by 2038, voters would prefer a phase-out by 2025. Policymakers may underestimate public willingness to support an expedited transition away from high-carbon sources of energy.
Messages for policy
A more ambitious timeline for phasing out coal would be better aligned with voters’ preferences in Germany.
Although voters are willing to incur additional costs for a phase-out by 2025, every €10 increase in annual household cost decreases voter support by about seven percentage points.
In coal-producing regions, creating new jobs in low-carbon industries is important to voters and can outweigh concerns about job losses.
In the area of the energy transition, systematic incorporation of the views of the population into future government commission recommendations could lead to more publically acceptable policies.
Raising awareness for the scientific consensus on climate change could foster public acceptance of ambitious climate policies.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Further Reading
Markard, J. The next phase of the energy transition and its implications for research and policy. Nat. Energy 3, 628–633 (2018). A transition studies perspective that sheds light on the phenomena of the ‘second phase’ of the energy transition, including the decline of established business models and technologies, intensified economic and political struggles of key actors, and challenges for the overall functioning of the electricity sector.
Montt, G. et al. Does climate action destroy jobs? An assessment of the employment implications of the 2-degree goal. Int. Labour Rev. 157, 519–556 (2018). A quantitative scenario analysis of the worldwide employment impact of an energy sector transformation in line with the 2° C goal, which finds that by 2030 most economies will experience net job creation and reallocation across industries.
Leipprand, A. & Flachsland, C. Regime destabilization in energy transitions: the German debate on the future of coal. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 40, 190–204 (2018). An investigation of stakeholders’ framing strategies and proposed policy solutions for phasing out coal in Germany.
Pfeiffer, A., Hepburn, C., Vogt-Schilb, A. & Caldecott, B. Committed emissions from existing and planned power plants and asset stranding required to meet the Paris Agreement. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 054019 (2018). An analysis that compares CO 2 emission commitments from power plants with the remaining carbon budget and derives the likely amount of stranded assets that would be required to meet the 1.5 °C–2 °C global warming goal.
Rinscheid, A. & Wüstenhagen, R. Divesting, fast and slow: affective and cognitive drivers of fading voter support for a nuclear phase-out. Ecol. Econ. 152, 51–61 (2018). An analysis of cognitive and affective drivers of voters’ preferences in the context of the popular vote to phase out nuclear power in Switzerland.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge support by the Andlinger Center for Energy and the Environment at Princeton University, the Swiss Center of Competence for Energy Research (SCCER) CREST, the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant no. P1SGP1_174939) and Greenpeace Germany, who funded data collection. Design of the research project and data analysis were the sole responsibility of the authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rinscheid, A., Wüstenhagen, R. German voters would prefer a more ambitious timeline to phase out coal. Nat Energy 4, 1016–1017 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0509-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0509-9
