Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Continuous production of pure liquid fuel solutions via electrocatalytic CO2 reduction using solid-electrolyte devices

An Author Correction to this article was published on 18 December 2019

This article has been updated


Electrocatalytic CO2 reduction is often carried out in a solution electrolyte such as KHCO3(aq), which allows for ion conduction between electrodes. Therefore, liquid products that form are in a mixture with the dissolved salts, requiring energy-intensive downstream separation. Here, we report continuous electrocatalytic conversion of CO2 to pure liquid fuel solutions in cells that utilize solid electrolytes, where electrochemically generated cations (such as H+) and anions (such as HCOO) are combined to form pure product solutions without mixing with other ions. Using a HCOOH-selective (Faradaic efficiencies > 90%) and easily scaled Bi catalyst at the cathode, we demonstrate production of pure HCOOH solutions with concentrations up to 12 M. We also show 100 h continuous and stable generation of 0.1 M HCOOH with negligible degradation in selectivity and activity. Production of other electrolyte-free C2+ liquid oxygenate solutions, including acetic acid, ethanol and n-propanol, are also demonstrated using a Cu catalyst. Finally, we show that our CO2 reduction cell with solid electrolytes can be modified to suit other, more complex practical applications.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Schematic illustration of the CO2 reduction cell with solid electrolyte.
Fig. 2: Characterization of BOON and 2D-Bi.
Fig. 3: Electrocatalytic CO2 reduction to formate using the 2D-Bi catalyst.
Fig. 4: Production of pure liquid fuels using CO2 reduction system with solid electrolyte.
Fig. 5: Production of pure HCOOH solution and vapour using optimized CO2 reduction system with solid electrolyte.
Fig. 6: Different CO2RR system with solid electrolyte for more complex practical applications.

Data availability

The data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.

Change history

  • 18 December 2019

    An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.


  1. 1.

    Chu, S., Cui, Y. & Liu, N. The path towards sustainable energy. Nat. Mater. 16, 16 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Lin, S. et al. Covalent organic frameworks comprising cobalt porphyrins for catalytic CO2 reduction in water. Science 349, 1208–1213 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Li, F., Chen, L., Knowles, G. P., MacFarlane, D. R. & Zhang, J. Hierarchical mesoporous SnO2 nanosheets on carbon cloth: a robust and flexible electrocatalyst for CO2 reduction with high efficiency and selectivity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 505–509 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Ripatti, D. S., Veltman, T. R. & Kanan, M. W. Carbon monoxide gas diffusion electrolysis that produces concentrated C2 products with high single-pass conversion. Joule 3, 240–256 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kortlever, R., Peters, I., Koper, S. & Koper, M. T. Electrochemical CO2 reduction to formic acid at low overpotential and with high faradaic efficiency on carbon-supported bimetallic Pd-Pt nanoparticles. ACS Catal. 5, 3916–3923 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Yang, H., Kaczur, J. J., Sajjad, S. D. & Masel, R. I. CO2 conversion to formic acid in a three compartment cell with Sustainion™ membranes. ECS Trans. 77, 1425–1431 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Klinkova, A. et al. Rational design of efficient palladium catalysts for electroreduction of carbon dioxide to formate. ACS Catal. 6, 8115–8120 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Lee, W., Kim, Y. E., Youn, M. H., Jeong, S. K. & Park, K. T. Catholyte‐free electrocatalytic CO2 reduction to formate. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 6883–6887 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Ren, D. et al. Selective electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide to ethylene and ethanol on copper (I) oxide catalysts. ACS Catal. 5, 2814–2821 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Jiang, K. et al. Metal ion cycling of Cu foil for selective C-C coupling in electrochemical CO2 reduction. Nat. Catal. 1, 111 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Li, C. W., Ciston, J. & Kanan, M. W. Electroreduction of carbon monoxide to liquid fuel on oxide-derived nanocrystalline copper. Nature 508, 504 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Ren, D., Wong, N. T., Handoko, A. D., Huang, Y. & Yeo, B. S. Mechanistic insights into the enhanced activity and stability of agglomerated Cu nanocrystals for the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide to n-propanol. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7, 20–24 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kim, D., Kley, C. S., Li, Y. & Yang, P. Copper nanoparticle ensembles for selective electroreduction of CO2 to C2-C3 products. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 10560–10565 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Jouny, M., Luc, W. & Jiao, F. General techno-economic analysis of CO2 electrolysis systems. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 57, 2165–2177 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Bushuyev, O. S. et al. What should we make with CO2 and how can we make it? Joule 2, 825–832 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    He, S. et al. The p‐orbital delocalization of main-group metal boosting CO2 electroreduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 16114–16119 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Han, N. et al. Ultrathin bismuth nanosheets from in situ topotactic transformation for selective electrocatalytic CO2 reduction to formate. Nat. Commun. 9, 1320 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Zheng, X. et al. Sulfur-modulated tin sites enable highly selective electrochemical reduction of CO2 to formate. Joule 1, 794–805 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Zhang, S., Kang, P. & Meyer, T. J. Nanostructured tin catalysts for selective electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide to formate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 1734–1737 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Zhong, H. et al. Bismuth nanodendrites as a high performance electrocatalyst for selective conversion of CO2 to formate. J. Mater. Chem. A 4, 13746–13753 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    García de Arquer, F. P. et al. 2D metal oxyhalide‐derived catalysts for efficient CO2 electroreduction. Adv. Mater. 30, 1802858 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Gao, S. et al. Partially oxidized atomic cobalt layers for carbon dioxide electroreduction to liquid fuel. Nature 529, 68 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Manthiram, A., Yu, X. & Wang, S. Lithium battery chemistries enabled by solid-state electrolytes. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 16103 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Fan, L., Wei, S., Li, S., Li, Q. & Lu, Y. Recent progress of the solid‐state electrolytes for high‐energy metal‐based batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1702657 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Kuehn, C., Leder, F., Jasinski, R. & Gaunt, K. The electrolytic synthesis of hydrogen peroxide in a dual membrane cell. J. Electrochem. Soc. 130, 1117–1119 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Yamamoto, T., Tryk, D. A., Fujishima, A. & Ohata, H. Production of syngas plus oxygen from CO2 in a gas-diffusion electrode-based electrolytic cell. Electrochim. Acta 47, 3327–3334 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Dinh, C.-T. et al. CO2 electroreduction to ethylene via hydroxide-mediated copper catalysis at an abrupt interface. Science 360, 783–787 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Jhong, H. R. M., Brushett, F. R. & Kenis, P. J. The effects of catalyst layer deposition methodology on electrode performance. Adv. Energy Mater. 3, 589–599 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Verma, S. et al. Insights into the low overpotential electroreduction of CO2 to CO on a supported gold catalyst in an alkaline flow electrolyzer. ACS Energy Lett. 3, 193–198 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Weekes, D. M., Salvatore, D. A., Reyes, A., Huang, A. & Berlinguette, C. P. Electrolytic CO2 reduction in a flow cell. Acc. Chem. Res. 51, 910–918 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Zheng, T. et al. Large-scale and highly selective CO2 electrocatalytic reduction on nickel single-atom catalyst. Joule 3, 1–14 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Jiang, K. et al. Isolated Ni single atoms in graphene nanosheets for high-performance CO2 reduction. Energ. Environ. Sci. 11, 893–903 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Delacourt, C., Ridgway, P. L., Kerr, J. B. & Newman, J. Design of an electrochemical cell making syngas (CO+H2) from CO2 and H2O reduction at room temperature. J. Electrochem. Soc. 155, B42–B49 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Natsui, K., Iwakawa, H., Ikemiya, N., Nakata, K. & Einaga, Y. Stable and highly efficient electrochemical production of formic acid from carbon dioxide using diamond electrodes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 130, 2669–2673 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Min, X. & Kanan, M. W. Pd-catalyzed electrohydrogenation of carbon dioxide to formate: high mass activity at low overpotential and identification of the deactivation pathway. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 4701–4708 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Lei, F. et al. Metallic tin quantum sheets confined in graphene toward high-efficiency carbon dioxide electroreduction. Nat. Commun. 7, 12697 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Jiang, B., Zhang, X. G., Jiang, K., Wu, D. Y. & Cai, W. B. Boosting formate production in electrocatalytic CO2 reduction over wide potential window on Pd surfaces. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 2880–2889 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Hoffman, Z. B., Gray, T. S., Moraveck, K. B., Gunnoe, T. B. & Zangari, G. Electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide to syngas and formate at dendritic copper-indium electrocatalysts. ACS Catal. 7, 5381–5390 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Gao, S. et al. Ultrathin Co3O4 layers realizing optimized CO2 electroreduction to formate. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 698–702 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Yang, H. et al. Selective CO2 reduction on 2D mesoporous Bi nanosheets. Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1801536 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Zhang, Y. et al. Controllable synthesis of few‐layer bismuth subcarbonate by electrochemical exfoliation for enhanced CO2 reduction performance. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 13283–13287 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Zhou, Y. et al. Monolayered Bi2WO6 nanosheets mimicking heterojunction interface with open surfaces for photocatalysis. Nat. Commun. 6, 8340 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Henry, N. et al. [Bi2O2]2+ layers in Bi2O2(OH)(NO3): synthesis and structure determination. Z. Naturforsch. 60b, 322–327 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Zhang, S. et al. Polyethylenimine-enhanced electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 to formate at nitrogen-doped carbon nanomaterials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 7845–7848 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Rosen, B. A. et al. Ionic liquid–mediated selective conversion of CO2 to CO at low overpotentials. Science 334, 643–644 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Jiang, K. et al. Transition-metal single atoms in a graphene shell as active centers for highly efficient artificial photosynthesis. Chem 3, 950–960 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Lee, Y., Suntivich, J., May, K. J., Perry, E. E. & Shao-Horn, Y. Synthesis and activities of rutile IrO2 and RuO2 nanoparticles for oxygen evolution in acid and alkaline solutions. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 3, 399–404 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Jeong, K.-J. et al. Fuel crossover in direct formic acid fuel cells. J. Power Sources 168, 119–125 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Kuhl, K. P., Cave, E. R., Abram, D. N. & Jaramillo, T. F. New insights into the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide on metallic copper surfaces. Energ. Environ. Sci. 5, 7050–7059 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Rice, C. et al. Direct formic acid fuel cells. J. Power Sources 111, 83–89 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Gong, M. et al. An advanced Ni-Fe layered double hydroxide electrocatalyst for water oxidation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 8452–8455 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Vermaas, D. A., Sassenburg, M. & Smith, W. A. Photo-assisted water splitting with bipolar membrane induced pH gradients for practical solar fuel devices. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 19556–19562 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Masel, R. I., Liu, Z. & Sajjad, S. Anion exchange membrane electrolyzers showing 1 A/cm2 at less than 2 V. ECS Trans. 75, 1143–1146 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Liu, Z., Yang, H., Kutz, R. & Masel, R. I. CO2 electrolysis to CO and O2 at high selectivity, stability and efficiency using Sustainion membranes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 165, J3371–J3377 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Liu, Z. et al. The effect of membrane on an alkaline water electrolyzer. Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 42, 29661–29665 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Millar, J., Smith, D., Marr, W. & Kressman, T. 33. Solvent-modified polymer networks. Part I. The preparation and characterisation of expanded-network and macroporous styrene–divinylbenzene copolymers and their sulphonates. J. Chem. Soc., 218–225 (1963).

  57. 57.

    Okuhara, T., Watanabe, H., Nishimura, T., Inumaru, K. & Misono, M. Microstructure of cesium hydrogen salts of 12-tungstophosphoric acid relevant to novel acid catalysis. Chem. Mater. 12, 2230–2238 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Bard, A. Standard Potentials in Aqueous Solution (Routledge, 2017).

  59. 59.

    Yoo, J. S., Christensen, R., Vegge, T., Nørskov, J. K. & Studt, F. Theoretical insight into the trends that guide the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide to formic acid. ChemSusChem 9, 358–363 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by Rice University. This research used the 8-ID (ISS) beamline of the National Synchrotron Light Source II and the Center for Functional Nanomaterials, US Department of Energy Office of Science User Facilities operated for the DOE Office of Science by Brookhaven National Laboratory under contract no. DE-SC0012704. Q.J. and H.N.A. acknowledge the support from King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST).

Author information




The project was conceptualized by C.X. and H.W., and supervised by H.W.; Bi-catalyst synthesis procedures were developed and performed by C.X.; C.X. and P.Z. conducted the catalytic tests and the related data processing. Materials characterization and analysis was performed by C.X. with the help of Q.J., W.L. and Y.P.; 1H and 13C NMR experiments and analysis were carried out by C.X. and Q.J.; in operando XAS study was performed by C.X. and H.W. with the support of E.S.; ICP-OES was conducted by Q.J.; H.N.A. provided suggestions on the work. C.X. and H.W. wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haotian Wang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–12, Note 1 and refs 1–2.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xia, C., Zhu, P., Jiang, Q. et al. Continuous production of pure liquid fuel solutions via electrocatalytic CO2 reduction using solid-electrolyte devices. Nat Energy 4, 776–785 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing