Reduction of lead leakage from damaged lead halide perovskite solar modules using self-healing polymer-based encapsulation


In recent years, the major factors that determine commercialization of perovskite photovoltaic technology have been shifting from solar cell performance to stability, reproducibility, device upscaling and the prevention of lead (Pb) leakage from the module over the device service life. Here we simulate a realistic scenario in which perovskite modules with different encapsulation methods are mechanically damaged by a hail impact (modified FM 44787 standard) and quantitatively measure the Pb leakage rates under a variety of weather conditions. We demonstrate that the encapsulation method based on an epoxy resin reduces the Pb leakage rate by a factor of 375 compared with the encapsulation method based on a glass cover with an ultraviolet-cured resin at the module edges. The greater Pb leakage reduction of the epoxy resin encapsulation is associated with its optimal self-healing characteristics under the operating conditions and with its increased mechanical strength. These findings strongly suggest that perovskite photovoltaic products can be deployed with minimal Pb leakage if appropriate encapsulation is employed.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Assessment of Pb leakage from damaged perovskite solar modules.
Fig. 2: Hail and weather tests on perovskite solar modules with different encapsulations.
Fig. 3: Pb concentration in the contaminated water.
Fig. 4: Self-healing properties of the ER encapsulant.
Fig. 5: Effect of four different weather conditions on Pb leakage with different encapsulation methods.

Data availability

The data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Best Research Cell Efficiencies (NREL, 2019);

  2. 2.

    Green, M. A. et al. Solar cell efficiency tables (version 53). Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 27, 3–12 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Correa-Baena, J. et al. Promises and challenges of perovskite solar cells. Science 358, 739–744 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Park, N.-G., Grätzel, M., Miyasaka, T., Zhu, K. & Emery, K. Towards stable and commercially available perovskite solar cells. Nat. Energy 1, 16152 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Rong, Y. et al. Challenges for commercializing perovskite solar cells. Science 361, eaat8235 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Christians, J. A. et al. Tailored interfaces of unencapsulated perovskite solar cells for >1,000 hour operational stability. Nat. Energy 3, 68–74 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ono, L. K., Qi, Y. B. & Liu, S. Z. Progress toward stable lead halide perovskite solar cells. Joule 2, 1961–1990 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Park, N., Huang, J. & Qi, Y. B. Themed issue on perovskite solar cells: research on metal halide perovskite solar cells towards deeper understanding, upscalable fabrication, long-term stability and Pb-free alternatives. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2, 2378–2380 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Juarez-Perez, E. J. et al. Photo-, thermal-decomposition in methylammonium halide lead perovskites and inferred design principles to increase photovoltaic device stability. J. Mater. Chem. A 6, 9604–9612 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Wang, S., Jiang, Y., Juarez-Perez, E. J., Ono, L. K. & Qi, Y. B. Accelerated degradation of methylammonium lead iodide perovskites induced by exposure to iodine vapour. Nat. Energy 2, 16195 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Juarez-Perez, E. J., Hawash, Z., Raga, S. R., Ono, L. K. & Qi, Y. B. Thermal degradation of CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite into NH3 and CH3I gases observed by coupled thermogravimetry–mass spectrometry analysis. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 3406–3410 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Rajagopal, A., Yao, K. & Jen, A. K. Toward perovskite solar cell commercialization: a perspective and research roadmap based on interfacial engineering. Adv. Mater. 30, 1800455 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Ju, M. et al. Toward eco-friendly and stable perovskite materials for photovoltaics. Joule 2, 1231–1241 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Abate, A. Perovskite solar cells go lead free. Joule 1, 659–664 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Shi, Z. J. et al. Lead-free organic-inorganic hybrid perovskites for photovoltaic applications: recent advances and perspectives. Adv. Mater. 26, 1605005 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Jiang, S., Wang, K., Zhang, H., Ding, Y. & Yu, Q. Encapsulation of PV modules using ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer as the encapsulant. Macromol. React. Eng. 9, 522–529 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Manufacture of a CIGS Solar Module (Soltecture, 2018);

  18. 18.

    Hirata, M. K., Freitas, J. N., Santos, T. E. A., Mammana, V. P. & Nogueira, A. F. Assembly considerations for dye-sensitized solar modules with polymer gel electrolyte. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 55, 10278–10285 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Wang, Z. et al. Efficient and air-stable mixed-cation lead mixed-halide perovskite solar cells with n-doped organic electron extraction layers. Adv. Mater. 29, 1604186 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Cheacharoen, R. et al. Design and understanding of encapsulated perovskite solar cells to withstand temperature cycling. Energy Environ. Sci. 11, 144–150 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Jiang, Y. et al. Combination of hybrid CVD and cation exchange for upscaling Cs-substituted mixed cation perovskite solar cells with high efficiency and stability. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1703835 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Kalista, S. J. Jr Self-healing of Thermoplastic Poly(ethylene-co-methacrylic Acid) Copolymers Following Projectile Puncture. Masters Thesis, Virginia Tech (2003).

  23. 23.

    Lertngim, A. et al. Preparation of Surlyn films reinforced with cellulose nanofibres and feasibility of applying the transparent composite films for organic photovoltaic encapsulation. R. Soc. Open Sci. 4, 170792 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Approval Standard for Rigid Photovoltaic Modules (FM 44787) (FM Approvals, 2018);

  25. 25.

    Solar Resource Information (NREL, 2018);

  26. 26.

    Hailegnaw, B., Kirmayer, S., Edri, E., Hodes, G. & Cahen, D. Rain on methylammonium lead iodide based perovskites: possible environmental effects of perovskite solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 1543–1547 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Mathiak, G. et al. PV module damages caused by hail impact field experience and lab tests. In 31st European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition 1915–1919 (EU PVCSE, 2015).

  28. 28.

    Leyden, M. R., Jiang, Y. & Qi, Y. B. Chemical vapor deposition grown formamidinium perovskite solar modules with high steady state power and thermal stability. J. Mater. Chem. A 4, 13125–13132 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Pantic, L. S. et al. The assessment of different models to predict solar module temperature, output power and efficiency for Nis, Serbia. Energy 109, 38–48 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Espinosa, N., Zimmermann, Y., Benatto, G. A. R., Lenz, M. & Krebs, F. C. Outdoor fate and environmental impact of polymer solar cells through leaching and emission to rainwater and soil. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 1674–1680 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Serrano-Lujan, L. et al. Tin- and lead-based perovskite solar cells under scrutiny: an environmental perspective. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1501119 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Hauck, M., Ligthart, T., Schaap, M., Boukris, E. & Brouwer, D. Environmental benefits of reduced electricity use exceed impacts from lead use for perovskite based tandem solar cell. Renew. Energy 111, 906–913 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Celik, I. et al. Life cycle assessment (LCA) of perovskite PV cells projected from lab to fab. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 156, 157–169 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Celik, I., Song, Z., Phillips, A. B., Heben, M. J. & Apul, D. Life cycle analysis of metals in emerging photovoltaic (PV) technologies: a modeling approach to estimate use phase leaching. J. Clean. Prod. 186, 632–639 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Celik, I. et al. Environmental analysis of perovskites and other relevant solar cell technologies in a tandem configuration. Energy Environ. Sci. 10, 1874–1884 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Babayigit, A. et al. Assessing the toxicity of Pb- and Sn-based perovskite solar cells in model organism Danio rerio. Sci. Rep. 6, 18721 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Babayigit, A., Ethirajan, A., Muller, M. & Conings, B. Toxicity of organometal halide perovskite solar cells. Nat. Mater. 15, 247–251 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Lv, T. et al. Self-restoration of superhydrophobicity on shape memory polymer arrays with both crushed microstructure and damaged surface chemistry. Small 13, 1503402 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Holzhey, P. & Saliba, M. A full overview of international standards assessing the long-term stability of perovskite solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 6, 21794–21808 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Water in the Atmosphere (Met Office, 2007);

Download references


This work was supported by funding from the Energy Materials and Surface Sciences Unit of the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, the OIST R&D Cluster Research Program, the OIST Proof of Concept (POC) Program, and JSPS KAKENHI Grant no. JP18K05266. We thank Y. Iinuma (the technician at OIST) for the ICP–MS measurements.

Author information




Y.Q. conceived the idea, initiated and supervised the work. Y.J. and L.Q. designed the experiment, prepared the modules, tested the module breaking conditions and measured the Pb leakage. Y.J. performed the current density–voltage measurements and water CA measurements. L.Q. carried out the differential scanning calorimeter measurements. E.J.J.-P. did the thermogravimetric measurements. All the authors contributed to writing the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yabing Qi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–14, Supplementary Tables 1–5, Supplementary Notes 1 and 2, and Supplementary references.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Video 1

Mechanical strength of the ER polymers with different composition at 65 °C.

Supplementary Video 2

Mechanical strength of the ER polymers with different composition at 85 °C.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, Y., Qiu, L., Juarez-Perez, E.J. et al. Reduction of lead leakage from damaged lead halide perovskite solar modules using self-healing polymer-based encapsulation. Nat Energy 4, 585–593 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading


Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing