Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.


Varying impacts of China’s coal ban

Policies that encourage a shift away from solid fuels can improve public health, welfare and the environment. However, impacts and their distribution are rarely evaluated. Now research shows that benefits to home comfort, indoor air quality and well-being from China’s coal-to-electricity programme vary across rich and poor districts.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    Duan, X. et al. Appl. Energy 136, 692–703 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Global Burden of Disease Collaborative Network IHME Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 (GBD 2016) Results (Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, 2017).

  3. 3.

    Barrington-Leigh, C. et al. Nat. Energy (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Zhang, X. et al. Energy Policy 127, 165–178 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Liu, J. et al. Environ. Int. 125, 236–244 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shonali Pachauri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pachauri, S. Varying impacts of China’s coal ban. Nat Energy 4, 356–357 (2019).

Download citation


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing