Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Path dependency in provision of domestic heating

Abstract

In the United Kingdom, natural gas dominates the provision of heating in buildings. In Sweden, oil heating has been largely replaced by district heating and heat pumps. The origins and outcomes of path dependence and lock-in in heat-system evolution can be country specific. Here, we compare case studies of heat transitions in the United Kingdom and Sweden, addressing the question: can path dependency help to understand why these countries have followed different paths in terms of change to their heating infrastructure? In both countries, the development of heating infrastructures can be understood as path-dependent processes, entailing increasing returns to adoption as fuel sources, infrastructures and end-use technologies coevolve such that the overall performance of the system increases. The challenge for policymakers seeking to achieve carbon targets is to consider how to create the conditions to encourage increasing returns to adoption of low-carbon heating solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Fuel shares for residential and non-residential heating in selected countries.
Fig. 2: Installed central heating systems in United Kingdom households by type and fuel source, 1970 to 2014.
Fig. 3: Market shares of heat supply to residential and non-residential buildings in Sweden.

References

  1. Chaudry, M., Abeysekera, M., Hosseini, S., Jenkins, N. & Wu, J. Uncertainties in decarbonising heat in the UK. Energy Policy 87, 623–640 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hanna, R., Parrish, B. & Gross, R. Best Practice in Heat Decarbonisation Policy: A Review of the International Experience of Policies to Promote the Uptake of Low-carbon Heat Supply (UK Energy Research Centre, 2016).

  3. Vivid Economics & Imperial College London International Comparisons of Heating, Cooling and Heat Decarbonisation Policies (Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, 2017).

  4. Next Steps for UK Heat Policy (Committee on Climate Change, 2016); https://www.theccc.org.uk/publication/next-steps-for-uk-heat-policy/

  5. Homeowners’ Willingness to Take Up More Efficient Heating Systems (Department of Energy and Climate Change, 2013).

  6. Smart Systems and Heat: Consumer Challenges for Low Carbon Heat (Energy Technologies Institute, 2015); https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/assets.eti.co.uk/legacyUploads/2015/11/3501-Consumer-Insights.pdf?dl=1

  7. Hannon, M. Raising the temperature of the UK heat pump market: learning lessons from Finland. Energy Policy 85, 369–375 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Werner, S. District heating and cooling in Sweden. Energy 126 (Suppl. C), 419–429 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bouzarovski, S., Sýkora, L. & Matoušek, R. Locked-in post-socialism: rolling path dependencies in Liberec’s district heating system. Eurasia. Geogr. Econ. 57, 624–642 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Poputoaia, D. & Bouzarovski, S. Regulating district heating in Romania: legislative challenges and energy efficiency barriers. Energy Policy 38, 3820–3829 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fouquet, R. Path dependence in energy systems and economic development. Nat. Energy 1, 16098 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Arthur, W. Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Econ. J. 99, 116–131 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. David, P. in Evolution and Path Dependence in Economic Ideas: Past and Present (eds Garrouste, P. & Ioannides, S.) Ch. 2 (Edward Elgar, 2000).

  14. Pierson, P. Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 94, 251–267 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Unruh, G. Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 28, 817–830 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pearson, P. in Innovation and Disruption: The Energy Sector in Transition (British Institute of Energy Economics, 2016).

  17. Heiskanen, E., Lovio, R. & Jalas, M. Path creation for sustainable consumption: promoting alternative heating systems in Finland. J. Clean. Prod. 19, 1892–1900 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Heat Pumps Barometer (EurObserv’ER, 2015); https://www.eurobserv-er.org/pdf/2015/EurObservER-Heat-Pumps-Barometer-2015-EN.pdf

  19. Pearson, P. & Arapostathis, S. Two centuries of innovation, transformation and transition in the UK gas industry: Where next? Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. A 231, 478–497 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 2050 Energy Scenarios: The UK Gas Networks Role in a 2050 Whole Energy System (KPMG for Energy Networks Association, 2016); https://www.energynetworks.org/assets/files/gas/futures/KPMG%20Future%20of%20Gas%20Main%20report%20plus%20appendices%20FINAL.pdf

  21. Frontier Economics Pathways to High Penetration of Heat Pumps (Committee on Climate Change, 2013).

  22. Hanmer, C. & Abram, S. Actors, networks, and translation hubs: gas central heating as a rapid socio-technical transition in the United Kingdom. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 34, 176–183 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Arapostathis, S. et al. Governing transitions: cases and insights from two periods in the history of the UK gas industry. Energy Policy 52, 25–44 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. United Kingdom Housing Energy Fact File 2013 (Department of Energy and Climate Change, 2013).

  25. Energy Consumption in the UK 2017 Data Tables: Table 3.18 (Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, accessed 31 May 2018); https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/energy-consumption-in-the-uk

  26. Jeremiah, D. Architecture and Design for the Family in Britain, 1900–1970 (Manchester Univ. Press, 2000).

  27. Scarrow, H. The impact of British domestic air pollution legislation. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 2, 261–282 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Homes for Today and Tomorrow (Ministry of Housing and Local Government, 1961).

  29. Kuijer, L. & Watson, M. ‘That’s when we started using the living room’: lessons from a local history of domestic heating in the United Kingdom. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 28, 77–85 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Utley, J. & Shorrock, L. Domestic Energy Fact File 2008 (Building Research Establishment, 2008); https://www.bre.co.uk/filelibrary/pdf/rpts/Fact_File_2008.pdf

  31. Gross, R. et al. Presenting the Future: An Assessment of Future Costs Estimation Methodologies in the Electricity Generation Sector (UK Energy Research Centre, 2013).

  32. Weiss, M., Dittmar, L., Junginger, M., Patel, M. & Blok, K. Market diffusion, technological learning, and cost-benefit dynamics of condensing gas boilers in the Netherlands. Energy Policy 37, 2962–2976 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Arapostathis, S., Pearson, P. & Foxon, T. UK natural gas system integration in the making, 1960–2010: complexity, transitional uncertainties and uncertain transitions. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 11, 87–102 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ericsson, K. Introduction and Development of the Swedish District Heating Systems: Critical Factors and Lessons Learned (European Commission, 2009); https://ec.europa.eu/energy/intelligent/projects/sites/iee-projects/files/projects/documents/res-h_policy_introduction_and_development_of_swedish_dh_systms_en.pdf

  35. Di Lucia, L. & Ericsson, K. Low-carbon district heating in Sweden — examining a successful energy transition. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 4, 10–20 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Renewable Heat Policies: Delivering Clean Heat Solutions for the Energy Transition (International Energy Agency, 2018).

  37. Sumner, J., Bird, L. & Smith, H. Carbon Taxes: A Review of Experience and Policy Design Considerations Technical Report NREL/TP-6A2-47312 (National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2009); http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy10osti/47312.pdf

  38. State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2014 (Ecofys, World Bank, 2014); http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/505431468148506727/State-and-trends-of-carbon-pricing-2014

  39. Mahapatra, K. & Gustavsson, L. Influencing Swedish homeowners to adopt district heating system. Appl. Energy 86, 144–154 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Andrews, D. et al. Background Report on EU-27 District Heating and Cooling Potentials, Barriers, Best Practice and Measures of Promotion (European Commission Joint Research Centre, 2012).

  41. Patronen, J., Kaura, E. & Torvestad, C. Nordic Heating and Cooling: Nordic Approach to EU’s Heating and Cooling Strategy (Nordic Council of Ministers Denmark, 2017).

  42. Oñate, V., Kessels, K. & Six, D. Best-practices for district heating implementation in Belgium: policy analysis and benchmark from countries with high market penetration. In 2014 IEEE International Energy Conference (ENERGYCON) 1027–1033 (IEEE, 2014).

  43. Kiss, B., Neij, L. & Jakob, M. in Energy Technology Innovation: Learning from Historical Successes and Failures (eds Grubler, A. & Wilson, C.) Ch. 9 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

  44. Sandstrom, B. Swedish experience with subsidies for heat pump installations. European Heat Pump News (European Heat Pump Association, 2000).

  45. Johansson, P. Value Network Dynamics in Sustainability Transitions: The Role of Industry Incumbents in the Swedish Heat Pump Transition (International Sustainability Transitions Conference, 2016); http://kth.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1082004&dswid=6773

  46. Zimny, J., Michalak, P. & Szczotka, K. Polish heat pump market between 2000 and 2013: European background, current state and development prospects. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 48, 791–812 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. European Heat Pump Market and Statistics Report 2014 (European Heat Pump Association, 2014).

  48. Kiss, B., Neij, L. & Jakob, M. in Global Energy Assessment (eds Johansson, T., Patwardhan, A., Nakićenović, N. & Gomez-Echeverri, L.) Ch. 24 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2012).

  49. Dzebo, A. & Nykvist, B. A new regime and then what? Cracks and tensions in the socio-technical regime of the Swedish heat energy system. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 29, 113–122 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Harris, M. Thermal Energy Storage in Sweden and Denmark: Potentials for Technology Transfer. MSc thesis, Lund Univ. (2011).

  51. Forsen, M., Roots, P. & Bertenstam, A. Market Status for Ground Source Heat Pumps in Europe (European Commission, 2008); https://ec.europa.eu/energy/intelligent/projects/sites/iee-projects/files/projects/documents/ground-reach_market_status_for_gchp_in_europe.pdf

  52. Arthur, W. Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy (Univ. Michigan Press, 1994).

  53. Abramovitz, M. Resource and output trends in the United States since 1870. Am. Econ. Rev. 46, 5–23 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Solow, R. Technical change and the aggregate production function. Rev. Econ. Stat. 39, 312–320 (1957).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Arrow, K. The economic implications of learning by doing. Rev. Econ. Stud. 29, 155–173 (1962).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Perkins, R. Technological ‘lock-in’. In Internet Encyclopedia of Ecological Economics (International Society for Ecological Economics, 2003).

  57. Foray, D. The dynamic implications of increasing returns: technological change and path dependent inefficiency. Int. J. Ind. Organ. 15, 733–752 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. European Heat Pump Market and Statistics Report 2017 (European Heat Pump Association, 2017).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research on which this paper is based was undertaken as part of the research programme of the UK Energy Research Centre – Phase 3, which is funded by the UK Research and Innovation Energy Programme (grant reference EP/L024756/1). Part-funding for the original research was also provided by the Committee on Climate Change. Subsequent funding was provided by the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy for which the authors contributed to a review of international heating and cooling decarbonization policies led by Vivid Economics.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Robert Gross or Richard Hanna.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gross, R., Hanna, R. Path dependency in provision of domestic heating. Nat Energy 4, 358–364 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0383-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0383-5

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing