Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Exnovating for a renewable energy transition

New scientific findings cataloguing the need for a rapid renewable energy transition are most often met with calls for innovation. Our failure to address climate change and thereby avoid the socioeconomic crises it foretells will not be attributed to a lack of innovation, however, but rather to a lack of exnovation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. IPCC: Summary for Policymakers. In Global Warming of 1.5°C (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (IPCC, 2018).

  2. World Energy Outlook 2018 (International Energy Agency/OECD, 2018).

  3. Schumpeter, J. A. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (Harper & Brothers, 1942).

  4. Arne Heyen, D., Hermwille, L. & Wehnert, T. Out of the comfort zone! Governing the exnovation of unsustainable technologies and practices. GAIA 26, 326–331 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gross, M. & Mautz, R. Renewable Energies (Taylor and Francis, 2015).

  6. Kivimaa, P. & Kern, F. Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions. Res. Policy 45, 205–217 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Verbong, G. & Geels, F. The ongoing energy transition: lessons from a socio-technical, multi-level analysis of the Dutch electricity system (1960–2004). Energy Policy 35, 1025–1037 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. David, M. Moving beyond the heuristic of creative destruction: targeting exnovation with policy mixes for energy transitions. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 33, 138–146 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kimberly, J. R. in Handbook of Organizational Design (eds Nystorm, P. C. & Starbuck, W. H.) 84–104 (Elsevier, 1981).

  10. David, M. in Oxford Handbook of Energy and Society (eds Davidson, D. J. & Gross, M.) 519–538 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2018).

  11. Abrutyn, S. Revisiting Institutionalism in Sociology: Putting the “Institution” Back in Institutional Analysis (Routledge, 2014).

  12. Blyth, M. Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2002).

  13. Fligstein, N. & McAdam, D. Toward a general theory of strategic action fields. Sociol. Theory 29, 1–27 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Raworth, K. Donut Economics (Random House Business, 2018).

  15. David, M. The role of organized publics in articulating the exnovation of fossil-fuel technologies for intra- and intergenerational energy justice in energy transitions. Appl. Energy 228, 339–350 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debra J. Davidson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Davidson, D.J. Exnovating for a renewable energy transition. Nat Energy 4, 254–256 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0369-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0369-3

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene