Planar p–n homojunction perovskite solar cells with efficiency exceeding 21.3%


Perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have emerged as an attractive photovoltaic technology thanks to their outstanding power conversion efficiency (PCE). Further improvement in the device efficiency is limited by the recombination of the charge carriers in the perovskite layer even when employing heterojunction-based architectures. Here, we propose and demonstrate a p-type perovskite/n-type perovskite homojunction whose built-in electric field promotes oriented transport of the photo-induced carriers, thus reducing carrier recombination losses. By controlling the stoichiometry of the perovskite precursors, we are able to induce n-type or p-type doping. We integrate the homojunction structure in a planar PSC combining a thermally evaporated p-type perovskite layer on a solution-processed n-type perovskite layer. The PSC with a MAPbI3 homojunction achieves a PCE of 20.80% (20.5% certified PCE), whereas the PSC based on a FA0.15MA0.85PbI3 homojunction delivers a PCE of 21.38%. We demonstrate that the homojunction structure is an effective approach, beyond existing planar heterojunction PSCs, to achieve highly efficient PSCs with reduced carrier recombination losses.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Structure of planar PSCs with and without the homojunction and fabrication schematic of the homojunction PSC fabricated by the combined deposition method.
Fig. 2: Carrier generation and recombination of the planar PSCs with and without the homojunction.
Fig. 3: Doping, carrier transport and optical properties of the doped perovskite films.
Fig. 4: Cross-sectional KPFM measurement for the perovskite homojunction device under different bias voltages.
Fig. 5: Photovoltaic performance of the planar PSCs with and without the homojunction.
Fig. 6: The perovskite film analysis and stability assessment of the standard p–i–n PSC and the homojunction PSC.

Data availability

The data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Yang, W. S. et al. High-performance photovoltaic perovskite layers fabricated through intramolecular exchange. Science 348, 1234–1237 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Li, X. et al. A vacuum flash-assisted solution process for high-efficiency large-area perovskite solar cells. Science 353, 58–62 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Saliba, M. et al. Incorporation of rubidium cations into perovskite solar cells improves photovoltaic performance. Science 354, 206–209 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Cho, K. T. et al. Highly efficient perovskite solar cells with a compositionally engineered perovskite/hole transporting material interface. Energy Environ. Sci. 10, 21–627 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Yang, W. S. et al. Iodide management in formamidinium-lead-halide–based perovskite layers for efficient solar cells. Science 356, 1376–1379 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Kojima, A., Teshima, K., Shirai, Y. & Miyasaka, T. Organometal halide perovskites as visible-light sensitizers for photovoltaic cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 6050–6051 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Best Research-Cell Efficiencies Rev. 01-03-2019 (NREL, 2019);

  8. 8.

    Anyi, M. et al. A hole-conductor-free, fully printable mesoscopic perovskite solar cell with high stability. Science 345, 295–298 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Fu, F. et al. Low-temperature-processed efficient semi-transparent planar perovskite solar cells for bifacial and tandem applications. Nat. Commun. 6, 8932 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Johnston, M. B. & Herz, L. M. Hybrid perovskites for photovoltaics: charge-carrier recombination, diffusion,and radiative efficiencies. Acc. Chem. Res. 49, 146–154 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Stranks, S. D. et al. Electron–hole diffusion lengths exceeding 1 micrometer in an organometal trihalide perovskite absorber. Science 342, 341–344 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Dong, Q. et al. Electron–hole diffusion lengths > 175 μm in solution-grown CH3NH3PbI3 single crystals. Science 347, 967–970 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Green, M. A., Jiang, Y., Soufiani, A. M. & Ho-Baillie, A. Optical properties of photovoltaic organic–inorganic lead halide perovskites. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 4774–4785 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Shi, D. et al. Low trap-state density and long carrier diffusion in organolead trihalide perovskite single crystals. Science 347, 519–522 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Miyata, A. et al. Direct measurement of the exciton binding energy and effective masses for charge carriers in organic–inorganic tri-halide perovskites. Nat. Phys. 11, 582–587 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Jeon, N. J. et al. Solvent engineering for high-performance inorganic–organic hybrid perovskite solar cells. Nat. Mater. 13, 897–903 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Chen, H. N. et al. Solvent engineering boosts the efficiency of paintable carbon-based perovskite solar cells to beyond 14%. Adv. Energy Mater. 6, 1502087 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ahn, N. et al. Highly reproducible perovskite solar cells with average efficiency of 18.3% and best efficiency of 19.7% fabricated via Lewis base adduct of lead(II) iodide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 8696–8699 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Jeon, N. J. et al. Compositional engineering of perovskite materials for high-performance solar cells. Nature 517, 476–480 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Yang, Z. et al. Effects of formamidinium and bromide ion substitution in methylammonium lead triiodide toward high-performance perovskite solar cells. Nano Energy 22, 328–337 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kim, H. S. et al. Lead iodide perovskite sensitized all-solid-state submicron thin film mesoscopic solar cell with efficiency exceeding 9%. Sci. Rep. 2, 591 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Liu, M., Johnston, M. B. & Snaith, H. J. Efficient planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells by vapour deposition. Nature 501, 395–398 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Chiang, C. H. & Wu, C. G. Bulk heterojunction perovskite–PCBM solar cells with high fill factor. Nat. Photon. 10, 196–200 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Son, D. Y. et al. Self-formed grain boundary healing layer for highly efficient CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite solar cells. Nat. Energy 1, 16081 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Bi, D. et al. Polymer-templated nucleation and crystal growth of perovskite films for solar cells with efficiency greater than 21%. Nat. Energy 1, 16142 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Zheng, X. et al. Defect passivation in hybrid perovskite solar cells using quaternary ammonium halide anions and cations. Nat. Energy 2, 2017102 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Jiang, Q. et al. Enhanced electron extraction using SnO2 for high-efficiency planar-structure HC(NH2)2PbI3-based perovskite solar cells. Nat. Energy 2, 16177 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Burschka, J. et al. Sequential deposition as a route to high-performance perovskite-sensitized solar cells. Nature 499, 316–319 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Wei, D. et al. TiO2 embedded structure for perovskite solar cells with anomalous grain growth and effective electron extraction. J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 1406–1414 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Wang, K., Liu, C., Du, P., Zheng, J. & Gong, X. Bulk heterojuntion perovskite hybrid solar cells with large fill-factor. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 1245–1255 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Ye, S. et al. A strategy to simplify the preparation process of perovskite solar cells by co-deposition of a hole-conductor and a perovskite layer. Adv. Mater. 28, 9648–9654 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Wu, Y. et al. Perovskite solar cells with 18.21% efficiency and area over 1 cm2 fabricated by heterojunction engineering. Nat. Energy 1, 16148 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Kim, J., Lee, S. H., Lee, J. H. & Hong, K. H. The role of intrinsic defects in methylammonium lead iodide perovskite. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5, 1312–1317 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Yin, W. J., Shi, T. & Yan, Y. Unusual defect physics in CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite solar cell absorber. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 063903 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Wang, Q. et al. Qualifying composition dependent p and n self-doping in CH3NH3PbI3. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 163508 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Lyubov, A. F., Nadezhda, N. D. & Pavel, A. T. The chemical origin of the p-type and n-type doping effects in the hybrid methylammonium-lead iodide (MAPbI3) perovskite solar cells. Chem. Commun. 51, 14917 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Benedikt, D. Perovskite–perovskite homojunctions via compositional doping. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9, 2770–2775 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Ran, C., Xu, J., Gao, W., Huang, C. & Dou, S. Defects in metal triiodide perovskite materials towards high-performance solar cells: origin, impact, characterization, and engineering. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 4581–4610 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Song, D. et al. Managing carrier lifetime and doping property of lead halide perovskite by postannealing processes for highly efficient perovskite solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. C 119, 22812–22819 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Cui, P. et al. Highly efficient electron‐selective layer free perovskite solar cells by constructing effective p–n heterojunction. Solar RRL 1, 1600027 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Mali, S. S. & Hong, C. K. p–i–n/n–i–p type planar hybrid structure of highly efficient perovskite solar cells towards improved air stability: synthetic strategies and the role of p-type hole transport layer (HTL) and n-type electron transport layer (ETL) metal oxides. Nanoscale 8, 10528–10540 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Miyano, K., Tripathi, N., Yanagida, M. & Shirai, Y. Lead halide perovskite photovoltaic as a model p–i–n diode. Acc. Chem. Res. 49, 303–310 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Gil-Escrig, L., Miquel-Sempere, A., Sessolo, M. & Bolink, H. J. Mixed iodide-bromide methylammonium lead perovskite-based diodes for light emission and photovoltaics. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 3743–3748 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Sessolo, M., Momblona, C., Gil-Escrig, L. & Bolink, H. J. Photovoltaic devices employing vacuum-deposited perovskite layers. MRS Bull. 40, 660–666 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Liu, Y., Sun, Y. & Rockett, A. A new simulation software of solar cells—wxAMPS.Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. C 98, 124–128 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Song, D. et al. Dual function interfacial layer for highly efficient and stable lead halide perovskite solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 4, 6091–6097 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Bergmann, V. W. et al. Real-space observation of unbalanced charge distribution inside a perovskite-sensitized solar cell. Nat. Commun. 5, 5001 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Jiang, C. S. et al. Carrier separation and transport in perovskite solar cells studied by nanometre-scale profiling of electrical potential. Nat. Commun. 6, 8397 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Xiao, C. et al. Junction quality of SnO2-based perovskite solar cells investigated by nanometer-scale electrical potential profiling. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 38373 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work is supported partially by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 51772096), the Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality (L172036), Joint Funds of the Equipment Pre-Research and Ministry of Education (6141A020225), the Par-Eu Scholars Program, the Science and Technology Beijing 100 Leading Talent Training Project, the Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Project (Z161100002616039), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2016JQ01 and 2017ZZD02) and the NCEPU `Double First-Class' Graduate Talent Cultivation Program. We thank Z. Cheng, R. Xu and Z. Liu for KPFM measurements and analysis, and X. Han and Z. Li for high-resolution TEM measurements. P.C. acknowledges the scholarship from the China Scholarship Council and thanks G. Cao for fruitful discussions.

Author information




M.L. supervised the project. P.C. and M.L. conceived and designed the experiments. P.C. and D.W. performed the main experiments and characterization, and wrote the manuscript. J.J. helped with device optimization and fabrication. H.H. helped with KPFM measurements. E.J. performed Hall measurements and analysed the data. T.W. performed the simulation with wxAMPs. P.C., D.W., J.J., H.H., E.J., S.D., T.W., W.W. and M.L. contributed to the data analysis, discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meicheng Li.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Notes 1–3, Supplementary Figures 1–21, Supplementary Tables 1–6, Supplementary References.

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cui, P., Wei, D., Ji, J. et al. Planar p–n homojunction perovskite solar cells with efficiency exceeding 21.3%. Nat Energy 4, 150–159 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading