Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Author Correction: Empirically observed learning rates for concentrating solar power and their responses to regime change

The Original Article was published on 12 June 2017

This article has been updated

Correction to: Nature Energy https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2017.94, published online 12 June 2017.

In the version of this Analysis originally published, the total learning rate for parabolic trough stations with 6–8 hours of thermal storage (Fig. 2b) was calculated to be 25%. After publication, the authors found a code error that caused the learning curve fit function to believe that the first station in the dataset was marked as 1 GW and not 0 GW. As a result, the estimated learning rates for the complete timespan were too high. The correct learning rates should be 2.7% for Fig. 2a and 6.8% for Fig. 2b (instead of 5.2% and 25.2%, respectively). These learning rate fit curves have been updated and the captions have been corrected. In Fig. 2a, the fit for 2011–2014 was unaffected. For consistency with Fig. 2a, a fit for 2011–2017 has been added to Fig. 2b, showing a learning rate of 17.5% (R2 = 0.337). The text has been modified in the abstract and the sections ‘Observed investment cost development and learning rates’, ‘Policy regime impacts on cost development’ and ‘Conclusions’ to reflect the quantitative changes to the learning rates. Supplementary Notes 1, 3 and 4 and Supplementary Figs. 2, 6 and 7 and their captions have also been updated to reflect the new learning rates. In the caption of Supplementary Fig. 2b, “(2008–2017 learning rate=0.21, R2=0.468)” has been changed to “(2008–2017 learning rate=0.06, R2=0.513; 2011–2017 learning rate=0.079, R2=0.072)”. In the caption of Supplementary Fig. 6b, “(2008–2017 learning rate=0.289, R2=0.715)” has been changed to “(2008–2017 learning rate=0.077, R2=0.631; 2011–2017 learning rate=0.225, R2=0.498)”. In the caption of Supplementary Fig. 7, “(a) parabolic trough (PT) stations with <1 hour thermal storage (2011–2014 learning rate=0.297, R2=0.972 (US$) and learning rate=0.27, R2=0.909 (€)); and (b) PT stations with 6–8 hours of thermal storage (2008–2017 learning rate=0.252, R2=0.621 (US$) and learning rate=0.138, R2=0.502 (€))” has been changed to “(a) parabolic trough (PT) stations with <1 hour thermal storage (2011–2014 learning rate=0.297, R2=0.972 (US$) and 2011–2014 learning rate=0.27, R2=0.909 (€)); and (b) PT stations with 6-8 hours of thermal storage (2011–2017 learning rate=0.175, R2=0.337 (US$) and 2011–2017 learning rate=0.072, R2=0.149 (€))”. The underlying data were correct as originally published and remain unchanged. The corrected figures are shown below.

Fig. 2
figure 1

Original and Corrected.

Supplementary Fig. 2
figure 2

Original and Corrected.

Supplementary Fig. 6
figure 3

Original and Corrected.

Supplementary Fig. 7
figure 4

Original and Corrected.

Change history

  • 11 March 2019

    An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johan Lilliestam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lilliestam, J., Labordena, M., Patt, A. et al. Author Correction: Empirically observed learning rates for concentrating solar power and their responses to regime change. Nat Energy 4, 424–426 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0315-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0315-9

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing