Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The German energy transition in the British, Finnish and Hungarian news media

Abstract

Germany was the first major country to commit itself to an electricity system transition based on decentralized renewable sources and energy efficiency. This experiment has attracted interest worldwide, but its influence on national energy debates is largely unknown. We study how the German transition appeared in the news media of three countries following alternative nuclear pathways—the United Kingdom, Finland and Hungary—between 2011 and 2015. We show that most discussions are techno-economic, supply-oriented and focused on nuclear, wind and solar energy. Key issues such as energy democracy, regional development, participation, demand-side measures, and bioenergy are neglected. We find that topics are detached from their original contexts and selectively contextualized elsewhere, resulting in very different pictures of the same transition in specific countries and news sources. The ‘Energiewende’ has become part of the international energy policy landscape, but its representation depends on local visions of a good society.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: News media coverage of the Energiewende over time.

Data availability

All articles analysed in this study are available through the news provider databases. Access to the databases of The Guardian, The Times and Helsingin Sanomat is subject to subscription. Data are available from the authors upon reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Renn, O. & Marshall, J. P. Coal, nuclear and renewable energy policies in Germany: from the 1950s to the ‘Energiewende’. Energy Policy 99, 224–232 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Jacobsson, S. & Lauber, V. The politics and policy of energy system transformation—explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology. Energy Policy 34, 256–276 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Leipprand, A., Flachsland, C. & Pahle, M. Energy transition on the rise: discourses on energy future in the German parliament. Innov. Eur. J. Soc. Sci. Res. 30, 283–305 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Schmid, E., Knopf, B. & Pechan, A. Putting an energy system transformation into practice: the case of the German Energiewende. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 11, 263–275 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Geels, F. W. et al. The enactment of socio-technical transition pathways: a reformulated typology and a comparative multi-level analysis of the German and UK low-carbon electricity transitions (1990–2014). Res. Policy 45, 896–913 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Strunz, S. The German energy transition as a regime shift. Ecol. Econ. 100, 150–158 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Cherp, A., Vinichenko, V., Jewell, J., Suzuki, M. & Antal, M. Comparing electricity transitions: a historical analysis of nuclear, wind and solar power in Germany and Japan. Energy Policy 101, 612–628 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Geels, F. W. & Schot, J. Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Res. Policy 36, 399–417 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Geels, F. W., Sovacool, B. K., Schwanen, T. & Sorrell, S. Sociotechnical transitions for deep decarbonization. Science 357, 1242–1244 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Hermwille, L. The role of narratives in socio-technical transitions—Fukushima and the energy regimes of Japan, Germany, and the United Kingdom. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 11, 237–246 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Geels, F. W. The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: responses to seven criticisms. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transitions 1, 24–40 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    The Observatory of Economic Complexity (OEC, accessed 28 February 2018); https://atlas.media.mit.edu/en/

  13. 13.

    Kivimaa, P. & Mickwitz, P. Public policy as a part of transforming energy systems: framing bioenergy in Finnish energy policy. J. Clean. Prod. 19, 1812–1821 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Electricity Production, Consumption and Market Overview—Statistics Explained (Eurostat, accessed 28February 2018); http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Electricity_production,_consumption_and_market_overview.

  15. 15.

    2050 Low-carbon Economy (European Commission, accessed 28 February 2018); https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/strategies/2050_en

  16. 16.

    Kern, F., Kuzemko, C. & Mitchell, C. Measuring and explaining policy paradigm change: the case of UK energy policy. Policy Polit. 42, 513–530 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Teräväinen, T. Representations of energy policy and technology in British and Finnish newspaper media: a comparative perspective. Public Underst. Sci. 23, 299–315 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Carvalho, A. Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: re-reading news on climate change. Public Underst. Sci. 16, 223–243 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Teräväinen, T., Lehtonen, M. & Martiskainen, M. Climate change, energy security, and risk-debating nuclear new build in Finland, France and the UK. Energy Policy 39, 3434–3442 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Antal, M. Energy transition on the periphery: the case of solar, wind and nuclear electricity in Hungary. Proc. 12th Conf. European Society for Ecological Economics, 66–67 (ESEE, 2017); http://esee2017budapest.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/ESEE-2017-Proceedings-1.pdf

  21. 21.

    Forsyth, T. & Levidow, L. An ontological politics of comparative environmental analysis: the green economy and local diversity. Glob. Environ. Politics 15, 140–151 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Skjolsvold, T. M. Curb your enthusiasm: on media communication of bioenergy and the role of the news media in technology diffusion. Environ. Commun. 6, 512–531 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Heiskanen, E., Kivisaari, S., Lovio, R. & Mickwitz, P. Designed to travel? Transition management encounters environmental and innovation policy histories in Finland. Policy Sci. 42, 409–427 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Jasanoff, S. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 2007).

  25. 25.

    Rosenbloom, D., Berton, H. & Meadowcroft, J. Framing the Sun: a discursive approach to understanding multi-dimensional interactions within socio-technical transitions through the case of solar electricity in Ontario, Canada. Res. Policy 45, 1275–1290 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Smith, A., Kern, F., Raven, R., & Verhees, B. Spaces for sustainable innovation: solar photovoltaic electricity in the UK. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 81, 115–130 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Raven, R., Kern, F., Verhees, B. & Smith, A. Niche construction and empowerment through socio-political work. A meta-analysis of six low-carbon technology cases. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transitions 18, 164–180 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Joas, F., Pahle, M., Flachsland, C. & Joas, A. Which goals are driving the Energiewende? Making sense of the German energy transformation. Energy Policy 95, 42–51 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Holstenkamp, L. & Kahla, F. What are community energy companies trying to accomplish? An empirical investigation of investment motives in the German case. Energy Policy 97, 112–122 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Wilson, C., Grubler, A., Gallagher, K. S. & Nemet, G. F. Marginalization of end-use technologies in energy innovation for climate protection. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 780–788 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Torrijos, M. State of development of biogas production in Europe. Proc. Environ. Sci. 35, 881–889 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Leidreiter, A. A global shift to 100% renewables is not just cleaner—it’s about equality. Communities in Germany, Canada and Uganda are already reaping the benefits of moving away from fossil fuels to more decentralised energy systems. The Guardian (4 November 2015).

  33. 33.

    Harvey, F. Balcombe balks at tax changes for community green-energy projects; village which brought fracking to public attention fears changes to tax relief will thwart efforts to spread solar energy use. The Guardian (29 January 2015).

  34. 34.

    Webb, T. Don’t blame us for rise in charges, says Npower. The Times (15 November 2013).

  35. 35.

    Pagnamenta, R. Electricity costs are ‘crippling’ UK industry? Steelmakers demand help to stop Europe surging ahead? Administrators race to save 1,700 jobs as crisis deepens. The Times (21 October 2015).

  36. 36.

    Webb, T. Energy future is in the wind. The Times (3 July 2013).

  37. 37.

    Peltomaa, J. & Kolehmainen, J. Ten years of bioeconomy in the Finnish media. Alue ja Ympäristö 46, 57–63 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Rajamäki, T. Energian mallimaa Saksa on lisännyt hiilenpolttoa. Helsingin Sanomat (14 April 2014).

  39. 39.

    Berner, A.-S. Vallankumouksen esteet. Helsingin Sanomat (12 December 2011).

  40. 40.

    Berner, A.-S. Kyllä minun takapihalleni. Helsingin Sanomat (10 June 2012).

  41. 41.

    MTI. Drága mulatság a környezettudatosság. Index (20 September 2013); https://index.hu/tudomany/2013/09/20/draga_mulatsag_a_kornyezettudatossag/

  42. 42.

    Sipos, G. A tiszta és olcsó árammal indokolja a kormányzat a paksi bővítést. Origo (27 December 2011); http://www.origo.hu/idojaras/20111220-nem-engedheti-meg-maganak-az-atomstopot-magyarorszag-interju-a.html

  43. 43.

    Sipos, G. Megdobnák a villanyszámlát az új paksi reaktorok. Origo (13 December 2013); http://www.origo.hu/kornyezet/20131213-dragabb-aram-paks-atomeromu-fejlesztes-energiapolitika-csak-a-villanyszamlat-novelne-a-paksi.html

  44. 44.

    Eurologus. Paks: kódolva vannak a konfliktusok az EU-val (22 January 2014); https://index.hu/kulfold/eurologus/2014/01/22/paks_az_europai_energiapolitika_szemszogebol/

  45. 45.

    Jenei, M. Áramszünetek lesznek, ha nem csinálunk semmit (18 September 2015); https://index.hu/gazdasag/2015/09/18/aszodi_attila_interju/

  46. 46.

    Oels, A. Rendering climate change governable: from biopower to advanced liberal government? J. Environ. Policy Plan. 7, 185–207 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Nyugat.hu. A. Népszabadság kétszer annyi példányszámban kelt el, mint a Magyar Nemzet (10 September 2016); https://www.nyugat.hu/tartalom/cikk/politikai_lapok_nepszabadsag_peldanyszam_matesz

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work of M.A. was supported by the National Research, Development and Innovation Office of Hungary (grant no. OTKA-PD 116638). K.K. acknowledges funding support from the Academy of Finland (grant no. 284972) and Fulbright Finland. We thank S. Drews, K. Isoaho, E. Heiskanen, N. Honkela, J. Hukkinen, J. Marquardt and the Harvard Science, Technology and Society Program for comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.A. and K.K. designed and conducted the study together. M.A. analysed the material for the United Kingdom and Hungary. K.K. analysed the material for Finland. M.A. and K.K. wrote the paper together.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miklós Antal.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Notes 1–2, Supplementary Figure 1, Supplementary Tables 1–3

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Antal, M., Karhunmaa, K. The German energy transition in the British, Finnish and Hungarian news media. Nat Energy 3, 994–1001 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0248-3

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing