In Aesop’s fable, a swift hare races with a deliberate tortoise. In the end, the tortoise wins by taking a slow and steady approach. We argue that, given the economic constraints on US deployment of nuclear power, a ‘tortoise strategy’ is more prudent for US government nuclear R&D efforts.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Hansen, J., Emanuel, K., Caldeira, K. & Wigley, T. Nuclear Power paves the only viable path forward on climate change. The Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/dec/03/nuclear-power-paves-the-only-viable-path-forward-on-climate-change (2015).
Shellenberger, M. How fear of nuclear power is hurting the environment. TED Talks https://www.ted.com/talks/michael_shellenberger_how_fear_of_nuclear_power_is_hurting_the_environment (2016).
Caldicott, H. Nuclear Power is Not the Answer (The New Press: New York, London, 2006).
Jacobson, M., Delucchi, M. A., Cameron, M. A. & Frew, B. A. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 15060–15065 (2015).
Brick, S. & Thernstrom, S. Electr. J. 29, 6–12 (2016).
Williams, J. H. et al. Pathways to Deep Decarbonization in the United States. Revision with Technical Supplement (Energy and Environmental Economics, Inc., 2015).
Clack, C. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 6722–6727 (2017).
Wilks, A. G. FBI Agents flock to VC Summer site as part of probe into SC’s failed nuclear project. The State http://www.thestate.com/news/politics-government/article211199484.html (2018).
Annual Energy Outlook 2018 (EIA, 2018); www.eia.gov/aeo
Bistline, J. & James, R. Exploring the Role of Advanced Nuclear in Future Energy Markets (The Electric Power Research Institute, 2018).
Kroposki, B., Zhang, Y., Johnson, B. J. & Hodge, B. S. IEEE Power Energy Mag. 15, 61–73 (2017).
National Research Council. Energy in Transition 1985–2010: Final Report of the Committee on Nuclear and Alternative Energy Systems 210–344 (The National Academies Press, 1980).
Jenkins, J. et al. Appl. Energy 222, 872–884 (2018).
Brinton, S. The Advanced Nuclear Industry. Third Way https://www.thirdway.org/report/the-advanced-nuclear-industry (2015).
What will Advanced Nuclear Power Plants Cost? (Energy Innovation Reform Project, 2017).
Finan, A. Updating the licensing pathway to enable nuclear innovation. Clean Air Task Force http://www.catf.us/blogs/ahead/tag/nuclear/ (2016).
Abdulla, A. Y., Ford, M. J., Morgan, M. G. & Victor, D. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 084016 (2017).
Ford, M. J., Abdulla, A. Y., Morgan, M. G. & Victor, D. Energy Policy 108, 194–200 (2017).
Secretary of Energy Advisory Board Report of the Task Force on the Future of Nuclear Power (US Department of Energy, 2016); https://www.energy.gov/seab/downloads/final-report-task-force-future-nuclear-power
Petti, D. et al. Advanced Demonstration and Test Reactor Options Study (Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Argonne National Laboratory, Idaho National Laboratory, 2016).
A Technology Roadmap for Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems (NEA, GIF, 2002).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank G. Morgan, J. Lassiter, M. Bunn and A. Abdulla for helpful conversations.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ford, M.J., Schrag, D.P. A tortoise approach for US nuclear research and development. Nat Energy 3, 810–812 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0221-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0221-1
