Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Fuel choice and fuel demand elasticities in markets with flex-fuel vehicles

Abstract

The purchase of multifuel vehicles (MFVs) has been incentivized by policies across the globe. Such vehicles are able to operate on more than one source of energy, so they introduce fuel (or energy) choice as one additional dimension consumers decide about. As fuels differ in terms of carbon emissions, this choice has environmental effects. Using 12 years of monthly Swedish data, here I show that the majority of MFV drivers purchase petrol when it is priced at parity with ethanol. Through policy simulations, I document that fossil fuel taxes have limited success in making drivers switch to alternative fuels and can generate economic distortions. The findings question the cost-effectiveness of programmes to incentivize the purchase of MFVs that ignore the fuel choice dimension and highlight the importance of accounting for fuel choice in the analysis of public policy and emerging technologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Fuel market overview.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Salvo, A. & Huse, C. Build it, but will they come? Evidence from consumer choice between gasoline and sugarcane ethanol. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 66, 251–279 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Huse, C. & Lucinda, C. The market impact and the cost of environmental policy: evidence from the Swedish green car rebate. Econ. J. 124, F393–F419 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Huse, C. Fast and Furious (and Dirty): How Asymmetric Regulation may Hinder Environmental Policy MPRA Paper 48909 (Munich Personal RePEc Archive, 2014); https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/48909/

  4. Beresteanu, A. & Li, S. Gasoline prices, government support, and the demand for hybrid vehicles. Int. Econ. Rev. 52, 161–182 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Covert, T., Greenstone, M. & Knittel, C. R. Will we ever stop using fossil fuels? J. Econ. Perspect. 30(6), 117–138 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Graff-Zivin, J. S., Kotchen, M. J. & Mansur, E. T. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of marginal emissions: implications for electric cars and other electricity-shifting policies. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 107, 248–268 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Robinson, P. M. Root-N-consistent semiparametric regression. Econometrica 56, 931–954 (1988).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Small, K. A. & Van Dender, K. Fuel efficiency and motor vehicle travel: the declining rebound effect. Energy J. 28, 25–52 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hughes, J. E., Knittel, C. R. & Sperling, D. Evidence of a shift in the short-run price elasticity of gasoline. Energy J. 29, 113–134 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brons, M., Nijkamp, P., Pelsa, E. & Rietveld, P. A meta-analysis of the price elasticity of gasoline demand. A SUR approach. Energy Econ. 30(5), 2105–2122 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Anderson, S. T. The demand for ethanol as a gasoline substitute. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 63, 151–168 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Khachatryan, H., Yan, J. & Casavant, K. Spatial differences in price elasticity of demand for ethanol. J. Transp. Res. Forum 50(3), 43–61 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mandell, S. Carbon emission values in cost–benefit analyses. Transp. Policy 6(18), 888–892 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Holland, S. P., Mansur, E. T., Muller, N. Z. & Yates, A. J. Are there environmental benefits from driving electric vehicles? The importance of local factors. Am. Econ. Rev. 106(12), 3700–3729 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Corts, K. S. Building out alternative fuel retail infrastructure: government fleet spillovers in E85. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 59, 219–234 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shiver, S. K. Network effects in alternative fuel adoption: empirical analysis of the market for ethanol. Mark. Sci. 34(1), 78–97 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pavan, G. Green Car Adoption and the Supply of Alternative Fuels TSE Working Paper 17-875 (Toulouse School of Economics, 2017); https://www.tse-fr.eu/publications/green-car-adoption-and-supply-alternative-fuels

  18. Springel, K. Essays in Industrial Organizationand Environmental Economics Ch. 2 PhD thesis, Univ. California Berkeley (2017); http://digitalassets.lib.berkeley.edu/etd/ucb/text/Springel_berkeley_0028E_17004.pdf

  19. Li, S., Lang, T., Xing, J. & Zhou, Y. The market for electric vehicles: indirect network effects and policy impacts. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 4(1), 89–133 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  20. del Granado, F. J. A., Coady, D. & Gillingham, R. The unequal benefits of fuel subsidies: a review of evidence for developing countries. World Dev. 40(11), 2234–2248 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Clements, B., Coady, D., Fabrizio, S., Gupta, S. & Shang, B. Energy Subsidy Reform: Lessons and Implications (International Monetary Fund, Washington, 2013).

  22. Davis, L. W. The economic cost of global fuel subsidies. Am. Econ. Rev. Pap. Proc. 104(5), 581–585 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Coady, D., Parry, I. W. H., Sears, L. & Shang, B. How Large Are Global Energy Subsidies? (International Monetary Fund, Washington, 2015).

  24. Davis, L. W. The environmental cost of global fuel subsidies. Energy J. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.38.SI1.ldav(2017).

  25. Guidelines for Preparing Economic Analyses (US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC, 2014).

  26. Honk Kong Gasoline Prices (The Global Economy, accessed 17 April 2018); www.theglobaleconomy.com/Hong-Kong/gasoline_prices/

  27. Gasoline Prices around the World: The Real Cost of Filling Up (Bloomberg, accessed 17 April 2018); www.bloomberg.com/graphics/gas-prices/

  28. Statistics (SPBI, accessed 17 April 2018); http://spbi.se/statistik/

  29. Current Fuel Prices (Circle K, accessed 17 April 2018); www.circlek.se/sv_SE/pg1334072467111/privat.

  30. IMF Primary Commodity Prices (IMF, accessed 17 April 2018); www.imf.org/external/np/res/commod/index.aspx

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am indebted to N. Koptyug and C. Lucinda for their comments on an earlier draft of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

C.H. performed the data analysis, simulations and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cristian Huse.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Tables 1–8, Supplementary Notes 1–2, Supplementary Discussion, Supplementary Methods, Supplementary References

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huse, C. Fuel choice and fuel demand elasticities in markets with flex-fuel vehicles. Nat Energy 3, 582–588 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0175-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0175-3

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing