Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Quantifying the rural residential energy transition in China from 1992 to 2012 through a representative national survey

Abstract

Rural household energy use for cooking and heating is an important source of air pollutants in China, as it affects both human health and climate change. However, the magnitude of rural household energy use, especially during the recent rapid socioeconomic transition period, has not been well quantified. Here, we present first-hand nationwide data from a 34,489-household energy-mix survey and a 1,670-household fuel-weighing campaign. We found that the consumption of wood and crop residues in rural China decreased by 63% and 51%, respectively, from 1992 to 2012, and these decreases were much greater than the 15% and 8%, respectively, reported by the International Energy Agency and Food and Agriculture Organization. The rapid residential energy transition over these two decades was primarily driven by the rapid socioeconomic development. One important implication of this transition is the significant reduction in the emissions of major air pollutants, especially incomplete combustion products leading to significant impacts on health and climate.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Percentage share of fuel type in residential energy use in rural China in 2012.
Fig. 2: Changes in the relative time usages of residential energy from 1992 to 2012 in rural China.
Fig. 3: The transition trajectories of the rural residential energy mix from 1992 to 2012 in China.
Fig. 4: Comparison between the observed and model-predicted fractions of CF&E.
Fig. 5: Changes in residential energy consumption from 1992 to 2012 in rural China.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shen, H. Z. et al. Global atmospheric emissions of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from 1960 to 2008 and future predictions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 6415–6424 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang, R. et al. Exposure to ambient black carbon derived from a new inventory and high resolution model. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 2459–2463 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Huang, Y. et al. Quantification of global primary emissions of PM2.5, PM10, and TSP from combustion and industrial process sources. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 13834–13843 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang, R. et al. Estimation of global black carbon direct radiative forcing and its uncertainty constrained by observations. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 121, 5948–5971 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lelieveld, J. et al. The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale. Nature 525, 367–371 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Xie, Y. & Hu, J. W. An introduction to the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS). Chin. Social. Rev. 47, 3–29 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Qiu, H. G. et al. Renewable energy consumption in rural China: current situation and major driven factors. J. Beijing Inst. Technol. 17, 10–15 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, Y. L. et al. Transition of household cookfuels in China from 2010 to 2012. Appl. Energ. 184, 800–809 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. World Energy Statistics and Balances (International Energy Agency, Paris, 2016).

  10. National Bureau of Statistics China Statistical Yearbook 2011 (China Statistics Press, Beijing, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  11. China Statistical Yearbooks Database (National Bureau of Statistics, accessed August 2016); http://www.cnki.net/software/xzydq.html

  12. Janssens-Maenhout, G. et al. HTAP_v2.2: a mosaic of regional and global emission grid maps for 2008 and 2010 to study hemispheric transport of air pollution. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15, 11411–11432 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR_v4.2) (European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC)/Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL), accessed 20 December 2016); http://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu

  14. Major Figures on 2010 Population Census of China SPCO, The Sixth Population Census Office of the State Council (China Statistical Press, Beijing, 2012).

  15. Ministry of Environmental Protection Exposure Related Activity Patterns Research of Chinese Population, Adults (China Environment Press, Beijing, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hu, J. Y. Difference in Direct Residential Energy Consumption between Urban and Rural Households. MSc Thesis, Northern China Electric Power Univ. (2012).

  17. China unveils 2017–2021 winter clean heating plan. Reuters www.reuters.com/article/us-china-energy-heating/china-unveils-2017-2021-winter-clean-heating-plan-media-idUSKBN1EB02P (2017).

  18. Heltberg, R. Fuel switching, evidence from eight developing countries. Energ. Econ. 26, 869–887 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cai, J. & Jiang, Z. Changing of energy consumption patterns from rural households to urban households in China, an example from Shaanxi province, China. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 12, 1667–1680 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Peng, W. Y., Hisham, Z. & Pan, J. H. Household level fuel switching in rural Hubei. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 14, 238–244 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sovacool, B. K. Conceptualizing urban household energy use, climbing the 'energy services ladder'. Energ. Policy 39, 1659–1668 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen, H. et al. Modeling temporal variations in global residential energy consumption and pollutant emissions. Appl. Energ. 20, 327–340 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhu, D. et al. Temporal and spatial trends of residential energy consumption and air pollutant emissions in China. Appl. Energ. 106, 17–24 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang, S. S. & Lin, B. Q. Impact of tiered pricing system on China’s urban residential electricity consumption: survey evidences from 14 cities in Guangxi Province. J. Clean. Prod. 170, 1404–1412 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhu, C. Z. Should the domestic electricity price be reduced? China Power Ind. Manag. 11, 42–45 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  26. FAOSTAT (FAO, accessed 18 December 2016); http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data

  27. Jiang, X. Y., Sommer, S. G. & Christensen, K. V. A review of the biogas industry in China. Energ. Policy 39, 6073–6081 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lu, M. et al. Rebound effects for residential electricity use in urban China: an aggregation analysis based E-I-O and scenario simulation. Ann. Oper. Res. 255, 525–546 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang, Z. W. et al. Measurement of energy rebound effect in households: evidence from residential electricity consumption in Beijing, China. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 58, 852–861 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhong, Q. R. et al. Global estimates of carbon monoxide emissions from 1960 to 2013. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 24, 864–873 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Shen, H. Z. et al. Global lung cancer risk from PAH exposure highly depends on emission sources and individual susceptibility. Sci. Rep. 4, 6561 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Chafe, Z. A. et al. Household cooking with solid fuels contributes to ambient PM2.5 air pollution and the burden of disease. Environ. Health Persp. 122, 1314–1320 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang, W. M. China Rural Statistical Yearbook, 2015 (China Statistics Press, Beijing, 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ni, Y. J. Clean air action plan of this year will focus on rural coal use, high emission vehicles, and city fringe, Sina News 016, 1.4 (2016); http://news.sina.com.cn/c/2016-01-04/doc-ifxncyar6295849.shtml

  35. Shen, G. F. et al. Reductions in emissions of carbonaceous particulate matter and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from combustion of biomass pellets in comparison with raw fuel burning. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 6409–6416 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Chen, Y. C. et al. Household air pollution and personal exposure risk of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons among rural residents in Shanxi, China. Indoor Air 26, 246–258 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang, Q. H. & Nur, A. Analysis of multidimensional poverty of farmers in the poverty-stricken ethnic minority regions: a case study of three regions of Southern Xinjiang. Res. Agric. Mod. 37, 270–276 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Guo, X. M. & Gao, J. Key relations in targeting poverty alleviation strategy. Tianfu Theory 4, 1–5 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zhao, S. & Liu, S. H. Dilemma and approach to energy poverty in the construction of new village. J. South China Agric. Univ. 11, 14–22 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Tian, Y. S. Current and future development of rural energy in China. Energy China 35, 11–15 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Liu, C. X. et al. The diagnosis of health education on preventing indoor air pollution (IAP) in rural areas. J. Prev. Med. Inf. 20, 259–262 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  42. The State Council. Notification on distributing the scheme for the Second National Census of Pollutant Sources (Office of the State Council, Beijing, 2017).

  43. Social and Demographic Surveys (UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, accessed 12 April 2018); https://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/sources/surveys/default.htm

  44. Shen, G. F. et al. Comparison of carbonaceous particulate matter emission factors among different solid fuels burned in residential stoves. Atmos. Environ. 89, 337–345 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Chen, Z. J. Correlation of spatial distribution of college students with regional economy analysis—a case study of Gansu Province. Resource Development Market 30, 1185–1189 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Huang, Y. et al. Global organic carbon emissions from primary sources from 1960 to 2009. Atmos. Environ. 122, 505–512 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Su, S. S. et al. Sulfur dioxide emissions from combustion in China: from 1990 to 2007. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 8403–8410 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Ru, M. Y. et al. Direct energy consumption associated emissions by rural-to-urban migrants in Beijing. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 13708–13715 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Emission Inventories of Major Air Pollutants (Peking University, accessed 12 April 2018); http://inventory.pku.edu.cn

Download references

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank all the professors and students who participated in the China rural energy survey. This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos 41390240, 41571130010 and 41629101), the 111 Project (grant no. B14001), the undergraduate student research training program of the Ministry of Education and the United Nations Foundation (Clean Stove Alliance, grant no. PR-15-39806). Comments from K. Smith, T. Gasser and D. O. Carpenter are appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.T. designed the study. S.T., M.Y.R., G.F.S., H.Z.S., S.J.Z., Y.L.C., X.Y., X.L.W., W.X.L., H.F.C. and D.Q.Z. designed the questionnaire and organized the survey. W.D., T.B.H., N.L. and S.S. conducted the weighing campaign. Data analysis was conducted by S.T., M.Y.R., X.Z., Q.R.Z., B.G.L., J.F.L., W.J.M., X.L.P. and Y.X. Writing was led by S.T. with inputs from M.Y.R., W.D., X.Z., Q.R.Z. and B.G.L.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Tao.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1–11, Supplementary Tables 1–4, Supplementary References

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tao, S., Ru, M.Y., Du, W. et al. Quantifying the rural residential energy transition in China from 1992 to 2012 through a representative national survey. Nat Energy 3, 567–573 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0158-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0158-4

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing