Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Decoupling electron and ion storage and the path from interfacial storage to artificial electrodes

An Author Correction to this article was published on 23 April 2018

A Publisher Correction to this article was published on 28 March 2018

This article has been updated


The requirements for rechargeable batteries place high demands on the electrodes. Efficient storage means accommodating both ions and electrons, not only in substantial amounts, but also with substantial velocities. The materials’ space could be largely extended by decoupling the roles of ions and electrons such that transport and accommodation of ions take place in one phase of a composite, and transport and accommodation of electrons in the other phase. Here we discuss this synergistic concept being equally applicable for positive and negative electrodes along with examples from the literature for Li-based and Ag-based cells. Not only does the concept have the potential to mitigate the trade-off between power density and energy density, it also enables a generalized view of bulk and interfacial storage as necessary for nanocrystals. It furthermore allows for testable predictions of heterogeneous storage in passivation layers, dependence of transfer resistance on the state of charge, or heterogeneous storage of hydrogen at appropriate contacts. We also present an outlook on constructing artificial mixed-conductor electrodes that have the potential to achieve both high energy density and high power density.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type



Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: General concept of job-sharing mechanism.
Fig. 2: Ultrafast incorporation and ex-corporation of Ag in RbAg4I5:C composites.
Fig. 3: Literature examples of job-sharing storage.
Fig. 4: Charge carrier profiles for various relevant contact problems.

Change history

  • 23 April 2018

    In the version of this Perspective originally published, in the sentence “It is worthy of note that the final LiF-free situation characterized by MnO taking up the holes and the (F containing) MnO surface taking up the lithium ions is also a subcase of the job-sharing concept23.”, the word ‘holes’ should have been ‘electrons’. This has now been corrected.

  • 28 March 2018

    In the version of this Perspective originally published, the sentence ‘Supplementary information is available for this paper at’ was incorrectly included; there is no Supplementary Information for this content. The sentence has now been removed.


  1. Maier, J. Neue Wege der Batterieforschung in Die Zukunft der Energie (eds Gruss, P. & Schüth, F.) (C. H. Beck, Ulm, 2008).

  2. Dunn, B., Kamath, H. & Tarascon, J.-M. Electrical energy storage for the grid: a battery of choices. Science 334, 928–935 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bruce, P. G., Scrosati, B. & Tarascon, J.-M. Nanomaterials for rechargeable lithium batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 2930–2946 (2008).

  4. Simon, P., Gogotsi, Y. & Dunn, B. Where do batteries end and supercapacitors begin? Science 343, 1210–1211 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Maier, J. Thermodynamics of electrochemical lithium storage. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 4998–5026 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Balaya, P., Li, H., Kienle, L. & Maier, J. Fully reversible homogeneous and heterogeneous Li storage in RuO2 with high capacity. Adv. Funct. Mater. 13, 621–625 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, C.-C. & Maier, J. Space charge storage in composites: thermodynamics. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19, 6379–6396 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fu, L., Chen, C.-C., Samuelis, D. & Maier, J. Thermodynamics of lithium storage at abrupt junctions: modeling and experimental evidence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 208301 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, C.-C., Fu, L. & Maier, J. Synergistic, ultrafast mass storage and removal in artificial mixed conductors. Nature 536, 159–164 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. de Levie, R. On porous electrodes in electrolyte solutions: I. Capacitance effects. Electrochim. Acta 8, 751–780 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hu, Y.-Y. et al. Origin of additional capacities in metal oxide lithium-ion battery electrodes. Nat. Mater. 12, 1130–1136 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim, Y. et al. Probing the additional capacity and reaction mechanism of the RuO2 anode in lithium rechargeable batteries. ChemSusChem 8, 2378–2384 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bekaert, E., Balaya, P., Murugavel, S., Maier, J. & Ménétrier, M. 6Li MAS NMR Investigation of electrochemical lithiation of RuO2: evidence for an interfacial storage mechanism. Chem. Mater. 21, 856–861 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhukovskii, Y. F., Balaya, P., Kotomin, E. A. & Maier, J. Evidence for interfacial-storage anomaly in nanocomposites for lithium batteries from first-principles simulations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 058302 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yu, X. Q. et al. Reversible lithium storage in LiF/Ti nanocomposites. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 11, 9497–9503 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liao, P., MacDonald, B. L., Dunlap, R. A. & Dahn, J. R. Combinatorially prepared [LiF]1−xFex nanocomposites for positive electrode materials in Li-ion batteries. Chem. Mater. 20, 454–461 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Guo, X. et al. Capacitive energy storage on Fe/Li3PO4 grain boundaries. J. Phys. Chem. C. 115, 3803–3808 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Oxley, J. A Solid State Electrochemical Capacitor Abstract 175 (Electrochemical Society, Houston, 1972).

  19. Kimmel, G. A., Petrik, N. G., Dohnálek, Z. & Kay, B. D. Crystalline ice growth on Pt (111): Observation of a hydrophobic water monolayer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 166102 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ohring, M. Materials Science of Thin Films (Academic Press, 2001).

  21. Kühne, M. et al. Ultrafast lithium diffusion in bilayer graphene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 895–900 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jung, S.-K. et al. Lithium-free transition metal monoxides for positive electrodes in lithium-ion batteries. Nat. Energy 2, 16208 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jamnik, J. & Maier, J. Nanocrystallinity effects in lithium battery materials Aspects of nano-ionics. Part IV. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 5, 5215–5220 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Maier, J. Ionic conduction in space charge regions. Prog. Solid State Chem. 23, 171–263 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Maier, J. Kröger–Vink diagrams for boundary regions. Solid State Ion. 32–33, 727–733 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shin, J.-Y., Samuelis, D. & Maier, J. Sustained lithium-storage performance of hierarchical, nanoporous anatase TiO2 at high rates: emphasis on interfacial storage phenomena. Adv. Funct. Mater. 21, 3464–3472 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bockris, J. O. M. & Khan, S. U. Surface Electrochemistry: A Molecular Level Approach (Springer, New York, 1993).

  28. Bard, A. J. & Faulkner, L. R. Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals and Applications (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2000).

  29. Kang, B. & Ceder, G. Battery materials for ultrafast charging and discharging. Nature 458, 190–193 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhu, C., Song, K., van Aken, P. A., Maier, J. & Yu, Y. Carbon-coated Na3V2(PO4)3 embedded in porous carbon matrix: an ultrafast Na-storage cathode with the potential of outperforming Li cathodes. Nano Lett. 14, 2175–2180 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Augustyn, V. et al. High-rate electrochemical energy storage through Li+ intercalation pseudocapacitance. Nat. Mater. 12, 518–522 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Peled, E. The electrochemical behavior of alkali and alkaline Earth metals in nonaqueous battery systems — the solid electrolyte interphase model. J. Electrochem. Soc. 126, 2047–2051 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Aurbach, D. Review of selected electrode–solution interactions which determine the performance of Li and Li ion batteries. J. Power Sour. 89, 206–218 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Maibach, J., Lindgren, F., Eriksson, H., Edström, K. & Hahlin, M. Electric potential gradient at the buried interface between lithium-ion battery electrodes and the SEI observed using photoelectron spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7, 1775–1780 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ciosek Högström, K. et al. The buried carbon/solid electrolyte interphase in Li-ion batteries studied by hard X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Electrochim. Acta 138, 430–436 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Schwöbel, A., Jaegermann, W. & Hausbrand, R. Interfacial energy level alignment and energy level diagrams for all-solid Li-ion cells: Impact of Li-ion transfer and double layer formation. Solid State Ion. 288, 224–228 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ohta, N. et al. Enhancement of the high-rate capability of solid-state lithium batteries by nanoscale interfacial modification. Adv. Mater. 18, 2226–2229 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Fu, L. et al. “Job-sharing” storage of hydrogen in Ru/Li2O nanocomposites. Nano Lett. 15, 4170–4175 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Maier, J. Mass storage in space charge regions of nano-sized systems (Nano-ionics. Part V). Faraday Discuss. 134, 51–66 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Thomas, J. M. & Thomas, W. J. Principles and Practice of Heterogeneous Catalysis (VCH, Weinheim, 1997).

  41. Lupetin, P., Gregori, G. & Maier, J. Mesoscopic charge carriers chemistry in nanocrystalline SrTiO3. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 10123–10126 (2010).

  42. Conway, B. E. Electrochemical Supercapacitors: Scientific Fundamentals and Technological Applications (Plenum Publishers, New York, 1999).

  43. Lukatskaya, M. R., Dunn, B. & Gogotsi, Y. Multidimensional materials and device architectures for future hybrid energy storage. Nat. Commun. 7, 12647 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Salanne, M. et al. Efficient storage mechanisms for building better supercapacitors. Nat. Energy 1, 16070 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Sata, N., Eberman, K., Eberl, K. & Maier, J. Mesoscopic fast ion conduction in nanometre-scale planar heterostructures. Nature 408, 946–949 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ploog, K. & Döhler, G. H. Compositional and doping superlattices in III-V semiconductors. Adv. Phys. 32, 285–359 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors thank L. Fu and E. Kotomin for useful discussions and C. Wu for reading the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joachim Maier.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, CC., Maier, J. Decoupling electron and ion storage and the path from interfacial storage to artificial electrodes. Nat Energy 3, 102–108 (2018).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing