Impact of uncoordinated plug-in electric vehicle charging on residential power demand

  • Nature Energyvolume 3pages193201 (2018)
  • doi:10.1038/s41560-017-0074-z
  • Download Citation


Electrification of transport offers opportunities to increase energy security, reduce carbon emissions, and improve local air quality. Plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs) are creating new connections between the transportation and electric sectors, and PEV charging will create opportunities and challenges in a system of growing complexity. Here, I use highly resolved models of residential power demand and PEV use to assess the impact of uncoordinated in-home PEV charging on residential power demand. While the increase in aggregate demand might be minimal even for high levels of PEV adoption, uncoordinated PEV charging could significantly change the shape of the aggregate residential demand, with impacts for electricity infrastructure, even at low adoption levels. Clustering effects in vehicle adoption at the local level might lead to high PEV concentrations even if overall adoption remains low, significantly increasing peak demand and requiring upgrades to the electricity distribution infrastructure. This effect is exacerbated when adopting higher in-home power charging.

Additional access options:

Already a subscriber?  Log in  now or  Register  for online access.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Global EV Outlook 2017. Two Million and Counting (International Energy Agency, 2017).

  2. 2.

    IPCC Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2014).

  3. 3.

    Energy Technology Perspectives 2017 (International Energy Agency, 2017).

  4. 4.

    United States Mid-Century Strategy for Deep Decarbonization (The White House, USA, 2016).

  5. 5.

    Kriegler, E. et al. The role of technology for achieving climate policy objectives: overview of the EMF 27 study on global technology and climate policy strategies. Climatic Change 123, 353–367 (2014).

  6. 6.

    Electric Vehicles Initiative (Clean Energy Ministerial, 2017);

  7. 7.

    Annual Energy Outlook 2016 (US Energy Information Administration, 2016).

  8. 8.

    Muratori, M., Schuelke-Leech, B.-A. & Rizzoni, G. Role of residential demand response in modern electricity markets. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 33, 546–553 (2014).

  9. 9.

    Plugged In: How Americans Charge Their Electric Vehicles (Idaho National Laboratory, 2015);

  10. 10.

    Wilson, J. W. Residential demand for electricity. Q. Rev. Econ. Bus. 11, 7–22 (1971).

  11. 11.

    Swan, L. G. & Ugursal, V. I. Modeling of end-use energy consumption in the residential sector: A review of modeling techniques. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 13, 1819–1835 (2009).

  12. 12.

    Bunn, D. Forecasting loads and prices in competitive power markets. Proc. IEEE 88, 163–169 (2000).

  13. 13.

    Arghira, N., Hawarah, L., Ploix, S. & Jacomino, M. Prediction of appliances energy use in smart homes. Energy 48, 128–134 (2012).

  14. 14.

    Muratori, M., Roberts, M. C., Sioshansi, R., Marano, V. & Rizzoni, G. A highly resolved modeling technique to simulate residential power demand. Appl. Energy 107, 465–473 (2013).

  15. 15.

    Capasso, A., Grattier, W., Lamedica, R. & Prudenzi, A. A bottom-up approach to residential load modeling. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 9, 957–964 (1994).

  16. 16.

    Richardson, I., Thomson, M., Infield, D. & Clifford, C. Domestic electricity use: A high-resolution energy demand model. Energy Build. 42, 1878–1887 (2010).

  17. 17.

    Widén, J. & Wäckelgård, E. A high-resolution stochastic model of domestic activity patterns and electricity demand. Appl. Energy 87, 1880–1892 (2010).

  18. 18.

    Muratori, M., Marano, V., Sioshansi, R. & Rizzoni, G. Energy consumption of residential HVAC systems: a simple physically-based model. In 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting (IEEE, 2012).

  19. 19.

    Muratori, M., Moran, M. J., Serra, E. & Rizzoni, G. Highly-resolved modeling of personal transportation energy consumption in the United States. Energy 58, 168–177 (2013).

  20. 20.

    Muratori, M. Impact of Uncoordinated Plug-in Electric Vehicle Charging on Residential Power Demand — Supplementary Data. No. 69. (NREL-DATA, Golden, 2017);

  21. 21.

    Muratori, M. Dynamic Management of Integrated Residential Energy Systems. PhD thesis, Ohio State Univ. (2014).

  22. 22.

    National Research Council. Transitions to alternative vehicles and fuels. (National Academies Press, Washington, 2013).

  23. 23.

    Residential Energy Consumption Survey (RECS) (US Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, 2009);

  24. 24.

    Denholm, P. & Short, W. An Evaluation of Utility System Impacts and Benefits of Optimally Dispatched Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles Technical Report NREL/TP-620-40293 (National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2006).

  25. 25.

    Environmental Assessment of Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles: Nationwide Greenhouse Gas Emissions Vol. 1 (EPRI, CA, 2007).

  26. 26.

    Gong, Q., Midlam-Mohler, S., Marano, V. & Rizzoni, G. Study of PEV charging on residential distribution transformer life. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 3, 404–412 (2012).

  27. 27.

    Chowdhury, A., Bertling, L. & Custer, D. Determining distribution substation transformer optimal loadings using a reliability cost-benefit approach. In Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems, 2006. 1–9 (IEEE, 2006).

  28. 28.

    Kahn, M. & Vaughn, R. GreenMarket Geography: the spatial clustering of hybrid vehicles and LEED registered buildings. BE J. Econ. Anal. Policy 9, 1935–1682 (2009).

  29. 29.

    Clement-Nyns, K., Haesen, E. & Driesen, J. The impact of charging plug-in hybrid electric vehicles on a residential distribution grid. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 25, 371–380 (2010).

  30. 30.

    Jardini, J. A., Schmidt, H. P., Tahan, C. M., De Oliveira, C. C. & Ahn, S. U. Distribution transformer loss of life evaluation: a novel approach based on daily load profiles. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 15, 361–366 (2000).

  31. 31.

    Melaina, M. et al. National Economic Value Assessment of Plug-in Electric Vehicles Vol. I. Technical Report NREL/TP-5400-66980 (National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2016).

  32. 32.

    Muratori, M. & Rizzoni, G. Residential demand response: dynamic energy management and time-varying electricity pricing. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 31, 1108–1117 (2016).

  33. 33.

    BMW i ChargeForward: PG&E’s Electric Vehicle Smart Charging Pilot (BMW Group and Pacific Gas and Electric Company, 2017);

  34. 34.

    Muratori, M., Chang, C.-Y., Rizzoni, G. & Zhang, W. Dynamic energy management of a residential energy eco-system. In Proc. ASME 2013 Dynamic Syst. Control Conf. 21–23 (ASME, 2013).

  35. 35.

    Green, R. C. II, Wang, L. & Alam, M. The impact of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles on distribution networks: A review and outlook. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 15, 544–553 (2011).

  36. 36.

    Bizzarri, F., Bizzozero, F., Brambilla, A., Gruosso, G. & Gajani, G. S. Electric vehicles state of charge and spatial distribution forecasting: A high-resolution model. In Ind. Electronics Soc. IECON 2016 42nd Ann. Conf. IEEE 3942–3947 (IEEE, 2016).

  37. 37.

    Gruosso, G. Analysis of impact of electrical vehicle charging on low voltage power grid. In Int. Conf. Electrical Syst. Aircraft Railway Ship Propulsion Road Vehicles Int. Transportation Electrification 1–6 (IEEE, 2016).

  38. 38.

    Hilshey, A. D., Hines, P. D., Rezaei, P. & Dowds, J. R. Estimating the impact of electric vehicle smart charging on distribution transformer aging. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 4, 905–913 (2013).

  39. 39.

    Foley, A., Tyther, B., Calnan, P. & Gallachóir, B. Ó. Impacts of electric vehicle charging under electricity market operations. Appl. Energy 101, 93–102 (2013).

  40. 40.

    Leou, R.-C., Su, C.-L. & Lu, C.-N. Stochastic analyses of electric vehicle charging impacts on distribution network. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 29, 1055–1063 (2014).

  41. 41.

    Fernandez, L. P., San Roman, T. G., Cossent, R., Domingo, C. M. & Frias, P. Assessment of the impact of plug-in electric vehicles on distribution networks. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 26, 206–213 (2011).

  42. 42.

    Masoum, A. S., Deilami, S., Moses, P. S. & Abu-Siada, A. Impacts of battery charging rates of plug-in electric vehicle on smart grid distribution systems. In Innovative Smart Grid Technol. Conf. Eur. 2010 IEEE PES 1–6 (IEEE, 2010).

  43. 43.

    Weiller, C. Plug-in hybrid electric vehicle impacts on hourly electricity demand in the United States. Energy Policy 39, 3766–3778 (2011).

  44. 44.

    Renewable Electricity Futures Study, Volume 3: End-Use Electricity Demand Technical Report NREL/TP-6A20-52409-3 (National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2012);

  45. 45.

    Tuttle, D. P. & Baldick, R. The evolution of plug-in electric vehicle-grid interactions. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 3, 500–505 (2012).

Download references


The author would like to thank G. Rizzoni, M. Moran, R. Sioshansi, B.-A. Schuelke-Leech and M. Roberts for their valuable contributions to the development of the models used in this paper. Results are based on models supported by the National Science Foundation under grant no. 1029337. This work was supported by the US Department of Energy under contract no. DE-AC36-08GO28308 with Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, the manager and operator of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory.

Author information


  1. The National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, USA

    • Matteo Muratori


  1. Search for Matteo Muratori in:

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matteo Muratori.