Systematic investigation of the impact of operation conditions on the degradation behaviour of perovskite solar cells

Abstract

Perovskite solar cells have achieved power-conversion efficiency values approaching those of established photovoltaic technologies, making the reliable assessment of their operational stability the next essential step towards commercialization. Although studies increasingly often involve a form of stability characterization, they are conducted in non-standardized ways, which yields data that are effectively incomparable. Furthermore, stability assessment of a novel material system with its own peculiarities might require an adjustment of common standards. Here, we investigate the effects of different environmental factors and electrical load on the ageing behaviour of perovskite solar cells. On this basis, we comment on our perceived relevance of the different ways these are currently aged. We also demonstrate how the results of the experiments can be distorted and how to avoid the common pitfalls. We hope this work will initiate discussion on how to age perovskite solar cells and facilitate the development of consensus stability measurement protocols.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: The effect of ultraviolet light on the stability of PSCs.
Fig. 2: The effect of atmosphere and light on ageing.
Fig. 3: The effect of temperature on ageing.
Fig. 4: The effect of load applied to the device on its stability.
Fig. 5: The dilemma of how to measure device PCE during ageing.
Fig. 6: The effect of light cycling on ageing.
Fig. 7: A typical result of keeping a device at MPP and N2.

References

  1. 1.

    Correa-Baena, J.-P. et al. The rapid evolution of highly efficient perovskite solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 10, 710–727 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Priyadarshi, A. et al. A large area (70 cm2) monolithic perovskite solar module with a high efficiency and stability. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 3687–3692 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Hu, Y. et al. Stable large-area (10×10 cm2) printable mesoscopic perovskite module exceeding 10% efficiency. Sol. RRL 1, 1600019 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Agresti, A. et al. Graphene interface engineering for perovskite solar modules: 12.6% power conversion efficiency over 50 cm2 active area. ACS Energy Lett. 2, 279–287 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Conings, B. et al. Intrinsic thermal instability of methylammonium lead trihalide perovskite. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1500477 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    You, J. et al. Improved air stability of perovskite solar cells via solution-processed metal oxide transport layers. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 75–81 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Saliba, M. et al. Incorporation of rubidium cations into perovskite solar cells improves photovoltaic performance. Science 354, 206–209 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Anaraki, E. H. et al. Highly efficient and stable planar perovskite solar cells by solution-processed tin oxide. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 3128–3134 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Zimmermann, E. et al. Erroneous efficiency reports harm organic solar cell research. Nat. Photon. 8, 669–672 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Snaith, H. J. et al. Anomalous hysteresis in perovskite solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5, 1511–1515 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Tress, W. et al. Understanding the rate-dependent JV hysteresis, slow time component, and aging in CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite solar cells: the role of a compensated electric field. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 995–1004 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Reese, M. O. et al. Consensus stability testing protocols for organic photovoltaic materials and devices. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 95, 1253–1267 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Saliba, M. et al. Cesium-containing triple cation perovskite solar cells: improved stability, reproducibility and high efficiency. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 1989–1997 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Leijtens, T. et al. Overcoming ultraviolet light instability of sensitized TiO2 with meso-superstructured organometal tri-halide perovskite solar cells. Nat. Commun. 4, 3885 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Shin, S. S. et al. Colloidally prepared La-doped BaSnO3 electrodes for efficient, photostable perovskite solar cells. Science 356, 167–171 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Lee, S.-W. et al. UV degradation and recovery of perovskite solar cells. Sci. Rep. 6, 38150 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Li, W. et al. Enhanced UV-light stability of planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells with caesium bromide interface modification. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 490–498 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Bella, F. et al. Improving efficiency and stability of perovskite solar cells with photocurable fluoropolymers. Science 354, 203–206 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Aristidou, N. et al. The role of oxygen in the degradation of methylammonium lead trihalide perovskite photoactive layers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 8208–8212 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Pearson, A. J. et al. Oxygen degradation in mesoporous Al2O3/CH3NH3PbI3–x Cl x perovskite solar cells: kinetics and mechanisms. Adv. Energy Mater. 6, 1600014 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Bryant, D. et al. Light and oxygen induced degradation limits the operational stability of methylammonium lead triiodide perovskite solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 1655–1660 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Yang, J., Siempelkamp, B. D., Liu, D. & Kelly, T. L. Investigation of CH3NH3PbI3 degradation rates and mechanisms in controlled humidity environments using in situ techniques. ACS Nano 9, 1955–1963 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Christians, J. A., Miranda Herrera, P. A. & Kamat, P. V. Transformation of the excited state and photovoltaic efficiency of CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite upon controlled exposure to humidified air. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 1530–1538 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Hwang, I., Jeong, I., Lee, J., Ko, M. J. & Yong, K. Enhancing stability of perovskite solar cells to moisture by the facile hydrophobic passivation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 17330–17336 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Long, M. et al. Nonstoichiometric acid–base reaction as reliable synthetic route to highly stable CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite film. Nat. Commun. 7, 13503 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Chen, W. et al. Efficient and stable large-area perovskite solar cells with inorganic charge extraction layers. Science 350, 944–948 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Brivio, F., Caetano, C. & Walsh, A. Thermodynamic origin of photoinstability in the CH3NH3Pb(I1–x Br x )3 hybrid halide perovskite alloy. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7, 1083–1087 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Divitini, G. et al. In situ observation of heat-induced degradation of perovskite solar cells. Nat. Energy 1, 15012 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Domanski, K. et al. Not all that glitters is gold: metal-migration-induced degradation in perovskite solar cells. ACS Nano 10, 6306–6314 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Gholipour, S. et al. Highly efficient and stable perovskite solar cells based on a low-cost carbon cloth. Adv. Energy Mater. 6, 1601116 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Aitola, K. et al. High temperature-stable perovskite solar cell based on low-cost carbon nanotube hole contact. Adv. Mater. 29, 1606398 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Bush, K. A. et al. Thermal and environmental stability of semi-transparent perovskite solar cells for tandems enabled by a solution-processed nanoparticle buffer layer and sputtered ITO electrode. Adv. Mater. 28, 3937–3943 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Bush, K. A. et al. 23.6%-efficient monolithic perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells with improved stability. Nat. Energy 2, 20179 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Zhao, X., Kim, H.-S., Seo, J.-Y. & Park, N.-G. Effect of selective contacts on the thermal stability of perovskite solar cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 7148–7153 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Eames, C. et al. Ionic transport in hybrid lead iodide perovskite solar cells. Nat. Commun. 6, 7497 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Meloni, S. et al. Ionic polarization-induced current–voltage hysteresis in CH3NH3PbX3 perovskite solar cells. Nat. Commun. 7, 10334 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Nie, W. et al. Light-activated photocurrent degradation and self-healing in perovskite solar cells. Nat. Commun. 7, 11574 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Huang, W., Manser, J. S., Kamat, P. V. & Ptasinska, S. Evolution of chemical composition, morphology, and photovoltaic efficiency of CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite under ambient conditions. Chem. Mater. 28, 303–311 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Bag, M. et al. Kinetics of ion transport in perovskite active layers and its implications for active layer stability. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 13130–13137 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Tress, W., Correa Baena, J. P., Saliba, M., Abate, A. & Graetzel, M. Inverted current–voltage hysteresis in mixed perovskite solar cells: polarization, energy barriers, and defect recombination. Adv. Energy Mater. 6, 1600396 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Domanski, K. et al. Migration of cations induces reversible performance losses over day/night cycling in perovskite solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 10, 604–613 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Abate, A. et al. Silolothiophene-linked triphenylamines as stable hole transporting materials for high efficiency perovskite solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 2946–2953 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Kong, J. et al. Long-term stable polymer solar cells with significantly reduced burn-in loss. Nat. Commun. 5, 6688 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Peters, C. H. et al. The mechanism of burn-in loss in a high efficiency polymer solar cell. Adv. Mater. 24, 663–668 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Tan, H. et al. Efficient and stable solution-processed planar perovskite solar cells via contact passivation. Science 355, 722–726 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Law, C. et al. Performance and stability of lead perovskite/TiO2, polymer/PCBM, and dye sensitized solar cells at light intensities up to 70 suns. Adv. Mater. 26, 6268–6273 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Mei, A. et al. A hole-conductor-free, fully printable mesoscopic perovskite solar cell with high stability. Science 345, 295–298 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Grancini, G. et al. One-year stable perovskite solar cells by 2D/3D interface engineering. Nat. Commun. 8, 15684 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Dualeh, A., Gao, P., Seok, S. I., Nazeeruddin, M. K. & Grätzel, M. Thermal behavior of methylammonium lead-trihalide perovskite photovoltaic light harvesters. Chem. Mater. 26, 6160–6164 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Akbulatov, A. F. et al. Probing the intrinsic thermal and photochemical stability of hybrid and inorganic lead halide perovskites. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 8, 1211–1218 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank B. Le Geyt, S. Sujito, C. Clement and A. Fattet for their help in building the ageing set-up used to collect the data presented here. We also thank T. Matsui, M. Yavari and M. Saliba for providing devices used in a pilot study. K.D. thanks the SNF for funding within the framework of the Umbrella project (grant agreement no. 407040–153952 and 407040–153990). E.A.A., W.T. and M.G. acknowledge King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST) for financial support under a joint research project. W.T. thanks the Swiss National Science Foundation for funding through an Ambizione fellowship.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

W.T. and K.D. conceived the study, which was then supervised by W.T. K.D. performed the stability measurements and analysed the data. The devices were prepared by E.A.A. The stability measurement set-up was designed and developed by K.D., W.T. and A.H. K.D. and W.T. wrote the first draft of the manuscript. M.G. and A.H. contributed to fruitful discussions and supervision of the project. All authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Konrad Domanski or Wolfgang Tress.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Tables 1 and 2, Supplementary Figures 1–8, Supplementary Notes 1 and 2, and Supplementary References

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Domanski, K., Alharbi, E.A., Hagfeldt, A. et al. Systematic investigation of the impact of operation conditions on the degradation behaviour of perovskite solar cells. Nat Energy 3, 61–67 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-017-0060-5

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing