Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Fire-extinguishing organic electrolytes for safe batteries


Severe safety concerns are impeding the large-scale employment of lithium/sodium batteries. Conventional electrolytes are highly flammable and volatile, which may cause catastrophic fires or explosions. Efforts to introduce flame-retardant solvents into the electrolytes have generally resulted in compromised battery performance because those solvents do not suitably passivate carbonaceous anodes. Here we report a salt-concentrated electrolyte design to resolve this dilemma via the spontaneous formation of a robust inorganic passivation film on the anode. We demonstrate that a concentrated electrolyte using a salt and a popular flame-retardant solvent (trimethyl phosphate), without any additives or soft binders, allows stable charge–discharge cycling of both hard-carbon and graphite anodes for more than 1,000 cycles (over one year) with negligible degradation; this performance is comparable or superior to that of conventional flammable carbonate electrolytes. The unusual passivation character of the concentrated electrolyte coupled with its fire-extinguishing property contributes to developing safe and long-lasting batteries, unlocking the limit toward development of much higher energy-density batteries.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: An overview of the rechargeable battery technologies.
Fig. 2: Electrolyte design concept for a safer battery.
Fig. 3: Solution structure and physicochemical properties dependent on concentration.
Fig. 4: Electrode passivation in the NaFSA/TMP electrolyte.
Fig. 5: Electrochemical performance of the hard-carbon electrode in a half-cell.
Fig. 6: Electrochemical performance of the natural graphite electrode in a half-cell.


  1. 1.

    Yoshida, K. et al. Oxidative-stability enhancement and charge transport mechanism in glyme-lithium salt equimolar complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 13121–13129 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Suo, L., Hu, Y.-S., Li, H., Armand, M. & Chen, L. A new class of Solvent-in-Salt electrolyte for high-energy rechargeable metallic lithium batteries. Nat. Commun. 4, 1481 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Yamada, Y. et al. Unusual stability of acetonitrile-based superconcentrated electrolytes for fast-charging lithium-ion batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 5039–5046 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Qian, J. et al. High rate and stable cycling of lithium metal anode. Nat. Commun. 6, 6362 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Suo, L. et al. ‘Water-in-salt’ electrolyte enables high-voltage aqueous lithium-ion chemistries. Science 350, 938–943 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Wang, J. et al. Superconcentrated electrolytes for a high-voltage lithium-ion battery. Nat. Commun. 7, 12032 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Yamada, Y. et al. Hydrate-melt electrolytes for high-energy-density aqueous batteries. Nat. Energy 1, 16129 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Xu, K. Nonaqueous liquid electrolytes for lithium-based rechargeable batteries. Chem. Rev. 104, 4303–4418 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Roth, E. P. & Orendorff, C. J. How electrolytes influence battery safety. Electrochem. Soc. Interface 21, 45–49 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Choi, N.-S. S. et al. Challenges facing lithium batteries and electrical double-layer capacitors. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 9994–10024 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Kalhoff, J., Eshetu, G. G., Bresser, D. & Passerini, S. Safer electrolytes for lithium-ion batteries: state of the art and perspectives. ChemSusChem 8, 2154–2175 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Wang, Q. et al. Thermal runaway caused fire and explosion of lithium ion battery. J. Power Sources 208, 210–224 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Finegan, D. P. et al. In-operando high-speed tomography of lithium-ion batteries during thermal runaway. Nat. Commun. 6, 6924 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Liu, K. et al. Electrospun core-shell microfiber separator with thermal-triggered flame-retardant properties for lithium-ion batteries. Sci. Adv. 3, e1601978 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Chen, Z. et al. Fast and reversible thermoresponsive polymer switching materials for safer batteries. Nat. Energy 1, 15009 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Sun, Y.-K. et al. Nanostructured high-energy cathode materials for advanced lithium batteries. Nat. Mater. 11, 942–947 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Lu, L., Han, X., Li, J., Hua, J. & Ouyang, M. A review on the key issues for lithium-ion battery management in electric vehicles. J. Power Sources 226, 272–288 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ribière, P. et al. Investigation on the fire-induced hazards of Li-ion battery cells by fire calorimetry. Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 5271–5280 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Liu, X., Stoliarov, S. I., Denlinger, M., Masias, A. & Snyder, K. Comprehensive calorimetry of the thermally-induced failure of a lithium ion battery. J. Power Sources 280, 516–525 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Ping, P. et al. Study of the fire behavior of high-energy lithium-ion batteries with full-scale burning test. J. Power Sources 285, 80–89 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Wang, X., Yasukawa, E. & Kasuya, S. Nonflammable trimethyl phosphate solvent-containing electrolytes for lithium-ion batteries: I. Fundamental properties. J. Electrochem. Soc. 148, A1058–A1065 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Shim, E. G., Nam, T. H., Kim, J. G., Kim, H. S. & Moon, S. I. Effect of the concentration of diphenyloctyl phosphate as a flame-retarding additive on the electrochemical performance of lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 54, 2276–2283 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Nakagawa, H. et al. Electrochemical Raman study of edge plane graphite negative-electrodes in electrolytes containing trialkyl phosphoric ester. J. Power Sources 212, 148–153 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Feng, J. et al. Ether-based nonflammable electrolyte for room temperature sodium battery. J. Power Sources 284, 222–226 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Xu, K., Ding, M. S., Zhang, S., Allen, J. L. & Jow, T. R. An attempt to formulate nonflammable lithium ion electrolytes with alkyl phosphates and phosphazenes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 149, A622–A626 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Xu, K., Ding, M. S., Zhang, S., Allen, J. L. & Jow, T. R. Evaluation of fluorinated alkyl phosphates as flame retardants in electrolytes for Li-ion batteries: I. Physical and electrochemical properties. J. Electrochem. Soc. 150, A161–A169 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Ota, H., Kominato, A., Chun, W.-J., Yasukawa, E. & Kasuya, S. Effect of cyclic phosphate additive in non-flammable electrolyte. J. Power Sources 119–121, 393–398 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Matsumoto, K. et al. Performance improvement of Li ion battery with non-flammable TMP mixed electrolyte by optimization of lithium salt concentration and SEI preformation technique on graphite anode. J. Electrochem. Soc. 161, A831–A834 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Murmann, P. et al. Influence of the fluorination degree of organophosphates on flammability and electrochemical performance in lithium ion batteries: studies on fluorinated compounds deriving from triethyl phosphate. J. Electrochem. Soc. 163, A751–A757 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Wang, X., Yamada, C., Naito, H., Segami, G. & Kibe, K. High-concentration trimethyl phosphate-based nonflammable electrolytes with improved charge-discharge performance of a graphite anode for lithium-ion cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 153, A135–A139 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Hess, S., Wohlfahrt-Mehrens, M. & Wachtler, M. Flammability of Li-ion battery electrolytes: flash point and self-extinguishing time measurements. J. Electrochem. Soc. 162, A3084–A3097 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Zeng, Z. et al. A safer sodium-ion battery based on nonflammable organic phosphate electrolyte. Adv. Sci. 3, 1600066 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Xu, K. Electrolytes and interphases in Li-ion batteries and beyond. Chem. Rev. 114, 11503–11618 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Han, F., Zhu, Y., He, X., Mo, Y. & Wang, C. Electrochemical stability of Li10GeP2S12 and Li7La3Zr2O12 solid electrolytes. Adv. Energy Mater. 6, 1501590 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Janek, J. & Zeier, W. G. A solid future for battery development. Nat. Energy 1, 16141 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Mogensen, R., Brandell, D. & Younesi, R. Solubility of the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) in sodium ion batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 1, 1173–1178 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Peled, E. Advanced model for solid electrolyte interphase electrodes in liquid and polymer electrolytes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 144, L208–L210 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Aurbach, D. Review of selected electrode–solution interactions which determine the performance of Li and Li ion batteries. J. Power Sources 89, 206–218 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Edström, K., Herstedt, M. & Abraham, D. P. A new look at the solid electrolyte interphase on graphite anodes in Li-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 153, 380–384 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Verma, P., Maire, P. & Novák, P. A review of the features and analyses of the solid electrolyte interphase in Li-ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 55, 6332–6341 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Gauthier, M. et al. Electrode–electrolyte interface in Li-ion batteries: current understanding and new insights. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 4653–4672 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Hammami, A., Raymond, N. & Armand, M. Lithium-ion batteries: Runaway risk of forming toxic compounds. Nature 424, 635–636 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Komaba, S. et al. Electrochemical Na insertion and solid electrolyte interphase for hard-carbon electrodes and application to Na-ion batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 21, 3859–3867 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Komaba, S. et al. Fluorinated ethylene carbonate as electrolyte additive for rechargeable Na batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 3, 4165–4168 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Ponrouch, A., Marchante, E., Courty, M., Tarascon, J.-M. & Palacín, M. R. In search of an optimized electrolyte for Na-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 8572–8583 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Eshetu, G. G. et al. Comprehensive insights into the reactivity of electrolytes based on sodium ions. ChemSusChem 9, 462–471 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    CPMD (IBM Corp/Max-Planck Institut für Feskörperforschung Stuttgart, 1990–2015);

  48. 48.

    Goedecker, S., Teter, M. & Hutter, J. Separable dual-space Gaussian pseudopotentials. Phys. Rev. B 54, 1703–1710 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by the Elements Strategy Initiative for Catalysts & Batteries (ESICB) of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) and JSPS KAKENHI Grant-in-Aid for Specially Promoted Research (Grant Number JP15H05701). This work was partially supported by Nippon Shokubai Co. and the ‘Priority Issue (No. 5) on Post K computer’ project of MEXT. The calculations were performed at the super-computers of the National Institute for Materials Science and The University of Tokyo as well as the K computer at RIKEN, partly through the HPCI System Projects (Project ID: hp160075, hp160174, hp160225, hp160080). J.W. is grateful to the Japan Society for the Promotion of Sciences for a JSPS Fellowship at The University of Tokyo (no. 16F16051). Y.Y. is grateful to JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (A) (no. 26708030). The authors are deeply grateful to R. Hagiwara, T. Nohira and K. Matsumoto (Kyoto University) for the fruitful discussion on the electrolyte design. The authors acknowledge J. Ma for synthesizing the Na3V2(PO4)3 material, S.-i. Nishimura and S.-C. Chung for their valuable suggestions on both the SEI identification and the manuscript, and L. Lander for the Rietveld refinement work.

Author information




A.Y. conceived and directed the project. Y.Y. and J.W. proposed the concept and designed the experiments. J.W. and K.T. performed the experiments and analysed the data. K.S., E.W. and Y.T. designed and conducted the theoretical calculations. All authors contributed to the discussion. J.W., Y.Y. and A.Y. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atsuo Yamada.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Figures, Tables and References

Supplementary Figures 1–18, Supplementary Tables 1–2 and Supplementary References

Supplementary Video 1

Flame test of the electrolyte vapour of 1.0 M LiPF6/DMC:TMP (1:1 by volume)

Supplementary Video 2

Flame test of the electrolyte vapour of 3.3 M NaFSA/TMP

Supplementary Video 3

Flame-test comparison between 1.0 M NaPF6/EC:DEC (1:1 by volume) and 3.3 M NaFSA/TMP

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, J., Yamada, Y., Sodeyama, K. et al. Fire-extinguishing organic electrolytes for safe batteries. Nat Energy 3, 22–29 (2018).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing