Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Viperin immunity evolved across the tree of life through serial innovations on a conserved scaffold

Abstract

Evolutionary arms races between cells and viruses drive the rapid diversification of antiviral genes in diverse life forms. Recent discoveries have revealed the existence of immune genes that are shared between prokaryotes and eukaryotes and show molecular and mechanistic similarities in their response to viruses. However, the evolutionary dynamics underlying the conservation and adaptation of these antiviral genes remain mostly unexplored. Here, we show that viperins constitute a highly conserved family of immune genes across diverse prokaryotes and eukaryotes and identify mechanisms by which they diversified in eukaryotes. Our findings indicate that viperins are enriched in Asgard archaea and widely distributed in all major eukaryotic clades, suggesting their presence in the last eukaryotic common ancestor and their acquisition in eukaryotes from an archaeal lineage. We show that viperins maintain their immune function by producing antiviral nucleotide analogues and demonstrate that eukaryotic viperins diversified through serial innovations on the viperin gene, such as the emergence and selection of substrate specificity towards pyrimidine nucleotides, and through partnerships with genes maintained through genetic linkage, notably with nucleotide kinases. These findings unveil biochemical and genomic transitions underlying the adaptation of immune genes shared by prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Our study paves the way for further understanding of the conservation of immunity across domains of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Viperins are an ancient family of immune genes present across domains of life.
Fig. 2: Asgard archaeal and eukaryotic viperins are antiviral and produce ddh-nucleotides.
Fig. 3: Viperin substrate specificity emerged in eukaryotes through serial innovations.
Fig. 4: Eukaryotic viperins adapted through functional genetic linkage.
Fig. 5: Proposed evolutionary scenario of viperin emergence and diversification in eukaryotes.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data used for this study are available here: https://github.com/mdmparis/viperins_evolution_2023 (ref. 68). Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Krupovic, M., Dolja, V. V. & Koonin, E. V. The virome of the last eukaryotic common ancestor and eukaryogenesis. Nat. Microbiol. 8, 1008–1017 (2023).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Krupovic, M., Dolja, V. V. & Koonin, E. V. The LUCA and its complex virome. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 18, 661–670 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bernheim, A. & Sorek, R. The pan-immune system of bacteria: antiviral defence as a community resource. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 18, 113–119 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Litman, G. W., Rast, J. P. & Fugmann, S. D. The origins of vertebrate adaptive immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 10, 543–553 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu, G., Zhang, H., Zhao, C. & Zhang, H. Evolutionary history of the toll-like receptor gene family across vertebrates. Genome Biol. Evol. 12, 3615–3634 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Iwama, R. E. & Moran, Y. Origins and diversification of animal innate immune responses against viral infections. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 7, 182–193 (2023).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. tenOever, B. R. The evolution of antiviral defense systems. Cell Host Microbe 19, 142–149 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu, Y., Zhang, Y.-M., Tang, Y., Chen, J.-Q. & Shao, Z.-Q. The evolution of plant NLR immune receptors and downstream signal components. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 73, 102363 (2023).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Green, T. J. & Speck, P. Antiviral defense and innate immune memory in the oyster. Viruses 10, 1378511 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  10. McDougal, M. B., Boys, I. N., Cruz-Rivera, P. D. L. & Schoggins, J. W. Evolution of the interferon response: lessons from ISGs of diverse mammals. Curr. Opin. Virol. 53, 101202 (2022).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wein, T. & Sorek, R. Bacterial origins of human cell-autonomous innate immune mechanisms. Nat. Rev. Immunol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-022-00705-4 (2022).

  12. Morehouse, B. R. et al. STING cyclic dinucleotide sensing originated in bacteria. Nature 586, 429–433 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Cohen, D. et al. Cyclic GMP-AMP signalling protects bacteria against viral infection. Nature 574, 691–695 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ofir, G. et al. Antiviral activity of bacterial TIR domains via immune signalling molecules. Nature 600, 116–120 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rousset, F. et al. A conserved family of immune effectors cleaves cellular ATP upon viral infection. Cell 186, 3619–3631.e13 (2023).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gao, L. A. et al. Prokaryotic innate immunity through pattern recognition of conserved viral proteins. Science 377, eabm4096 (2022).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Cury, J. et al. Conservation of antiviral systems across domains of life reveals novel immune mechanisms in humans. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.12 (2022).

  18. Rivera-Serrano, E. E. et al. Viperin reveals its true function. Annu. Rev. Virol. 7, 421–446 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Gizzi, A. S. et al. A naturally occurring antiviral ribonucleotide encoded by the human genome. Nature 558, 610–614 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Bernheim, A. et al. Prokaryotic viperins produce diverse antiviral molecules. Nature 589, 120–124 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lachowicz, J. C., Gizzi, A. S., Almo, S. C. & Grove, T. L. Structural insight into the substrate scope of viperin and viperin-like enzymes from three domains of life. Biochemistry https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00958 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fenwick, M. K., Su, D., Dong, M., Lin, H. & Ealick, S. E. Structural basis of the substrate selectivity of viperin. Biochemistry 59, 652–662 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fenwick, M. K., Li, Y., Cresswell, P., Modis, Y. & Ealick, S. E. Structural studies of viperin, an antiviral radical SAM enzyme. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 6806–6811 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Zaremba-Niedzwiedzka, K. et al. Asgard archaea illuminate the origin of eukaryotic cellular complexity. Nature 541, 353–358 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tesson, F. et al. Systematic and quantitative view of the antiviral arsenal of prokaryotes. Nat. Commun. 13, 2561 (2022).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Eme, L. et al. Inference and reconstruction of the heimdallarchaeial ancestry of eukaryotes. Nature 618, 992–999 (2023).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu, Y. et al. Expanded diversity of Asgard archaea and their relationships with eukaryotes. Nature 593, 553–557 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Wu, F. et al. Unique mobile elements and scalable gene flow at the prokaryote–eukaryote boundary revealed by circularized Asgard archaea genomes. Nat. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-021-01039-y (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Shujairi, W.-H. A. et al. Viperin is anti-viral in vitro but is dispensable for restricting dengue virus replication or induction of innate and inflammatory responses in vivo. J. Gen. Virol. 102, 001669 (2021).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Shomar Monges, H., Sorek, R., Noda Garcia, L., Machlenkin, A. & Sperandio, D. Anti-viral and anti-tumoral compounds. Patent WO/2022/038539 (2022).

  32. Hinson, E. R. & Cresswell, P. The N-terminal amphipathic alpha-helix of viperin mediates localization to the cytosolic face of the endoplasmic reticulum and inhibits protein secretion. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 4705–4712 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Inoue, T. & Tsai, B. How viruses use the endoplasmic reticulum for entry, replication, and assembly. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 5, a013250 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhu, M. et al. CMPK2 is a host restriction factor that inhibits infection of multiple coronaviruses in a cell-intrinsic manner. PLoS Biol. 21, e3002039 (2023).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Lawrence, J. G. Shared strategies in gene organization among prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Cell 110, 407–413 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Dumbrepatil, A. B. et al. Viperin interacts with the kinase IRAK1 and the E3 ubiquitin ligase TRAF6, coupling innate immune signaling to antiviral ribonucleotide synthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 294, 6888–6898 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Patel, A. M. & Marsh, E. N. G. The antiviral enzyme, viperin, activates protein ubiquitination by the E3 ubiquitin ligase, TRAF6. JACS 143, 4910–4914 (2021).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Pawlak, J. B. et al. CMPK2 restricts Zika virus replication by inhibiting viral translation. PLoS Pathog. 19, e1011286 (2023).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Leão, P. et al. Asgard archaea defense systems and their roles in the origin of eukaryotic immunity. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.13.557551 (2024).

  40. Slavik, K. M. et al. cGAS-like receptors sense RNA and control 3′2′-cGAMP signalling in Drosophila. Nature 597, 109–113 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Li, Y. et al. cGLRs are a diverse family of pattern recognition receptors in innate immunity. Cell 186, 3261–3276.e20 (2023).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Culbertson, E. M. & Levin, T. C. Eukaryotic CD-NTase, STING, and viperin proteins evolved via domain shuffling, horizontal transfer, and ancient inheritance from prokaryotes. PLoS Biol. 21, e3002436 (2023).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Yeaman, S. Genomic rearrangements and the evolution of clusters of locally adaptive loci. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, E1743–E1751 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Yeaman, S. Evolution of polygenic traits under global vs local adaptation. Genetics 220, iyab134 (2022).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Doron, S. et al. Systematic discovery of antiphage defense systems in the microbial pangenome. Science 359, eaar4120 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Abby, S. S., Néron, B., Ménager, H., Touchon, M. & Rocha, E. P. C. MacSyFinder: a program to mine genomes for molecular systems with an application to CRISPR-Cas systems. PLoS ONE 9, e110726 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Parks, D. H. et al. GTDB: an ongoing census of bacterial and archaeal diversity through a phylogenetically consistent, rank normalized and complete genome-based taxonomy. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D785–D794 (2022).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Eddy, S. R. Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7, e1002195 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Minh, B. Q. et al. IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol. Biol. Evol. 37, 1530–1534 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Fu, L., Niu, B., Zhu, Z., Wu, S. & Li, W. CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 28, 3150–3152 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Nakamura, T., Yamada, K. D., Tomii, K. & Katoh, K. Parallelization of MAFFT for large-scale multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics 34, 2490–2492 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Richter, D. J. et al. EukProt: a database of genome-scale predicted proteins across the diversity of eukaryotes. Peer Community J. 2, e56 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Capella-Gutiérrez, S., Silla-Martínez, J. M. & Gabaldón, T. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25, 1972–1973 (2009).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Menardo, F. et al. Treemmer: a tool to reduce large phylogenetic datasets with minimal loss of diversity. BMC Bioinformatics 19, 164 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Hoang, D. T., Chernomor, O., von Haeseler, A., Minh, B. Q. & Vinh, L. S. UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 518–522 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Letunic, I. & Bork, P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, W293–W296 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Mirdita, M. et al. ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all. Nat. Methods 19, 679–682 (2022).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Berman, H. M. et al. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 235–242 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Pei, J., Kim, B.-H. & Grishin, N. V. PROMALS3D: a tool for multiple protein sequence and structure alignments. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, 2295–2300 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Hsiao, J. J., Potter, O. G., Chu, T. W. & Yin, H. Improved LC/MS methods for the analysis of metal-sensitive analytes using medronic acid as a mobile phase additive. Anal. Chem. 90, 9457–9464 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Hunsucker, S. A., Mitchell, B. S. & Spychala, J. The 5′-nucleotidases as regulators of nucleotide and drug metabolism. Pharmacol. Ther. 107, 1–30 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Price, M. N., Dehal, P. S. & Arkin, A. P. FastTree 2 – approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS ONE 5, e9490 (2010).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Wang, H.-C., Minh, B. Q., Susko, E. & Roger, A. J. Modeling site heterogeneity with posterior mean site frequency profiles accelerates accurate phylogenomic estimation. Syst. Biol. 67, 216–235 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Beitz, E. TeXshade: shading and labeling of multiple sequence alignments using LaTeX2e. Bioinformatics 16, 135–139 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Almagro Armenteros, J. J. et al. Detecting sequence signals in targeting peptides using deep learning. Life Sci. Alliance 2, e201900429 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Steinegger, M. et al. HH-suite3 for fast remote homology detection and deep protein annotation. BMC Bioinformatics 20, 473 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Galperin, M. Y. et al. COG database update: focus on microbial diversity, model organisms, and widespread pathogens. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D274–D281 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. mdmparis / viperins_evolution_2023. GitHub https://github.com/mdmparis/viperins_evolution_2023 (2023).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank members of the MDM laboratory, E. Rocha, T. Wein and B. Morehouse for useful comments on earlier versions of the manuscript. Several bioinformatic analyses were performed on the Core Cluster of the Institut Français de Bioinformatique (ANR-11-INBS-0013). To promote gender equality and inclusivity in research, we are convinced of the importance of acknowledging gender bias in research article citation. Using a custom script available at https://github.com/mdmparis/Estimating_gender_bias_in_references, we estimated that among the 67 references cited in the main text, approximately 24% (16) have a female first author and approximately 10% (seven) have a female last author. H.G., F.T., M.G., H.S. and A.B. are supported by the CRI Research Fellowship to A.B. from the Bettencourt Schueller Foundation, the ATIP-Avenir programme from INSERM (R21042KS/RSE22002KSA), the Emergence programme from the University of Paris-Cité (RSFVJ21IDXB6_DANA) and an ERC Starting Grant (no. PECAN 101040529). H.S. received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement no 945298-ParisRegionFP. Y.F. is supported by ZJU-HIC start-up grants. F.W. is supported by a National Science Foundation of China grant (no. 32370003).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.F. and F.T. performed computational analyses for detection of antiphage defence systems in archaeal genomes. Y.F., J.C., F.T., H.S., H.G. and F.W. performed computational analyses related to viperin detection and phylogeny. F.W. provided AsgVip plasmids. H.S. and H.G. constructed strains and performed all experiments with assistance from B.O. and M.G. H.S. analysed mass spectrometry data, performed structural analyses and designed mutated viperins. H.S. and H.G. performed computational analyses of N-terminal tails, H.G. performed analyses of viperin-fused domains, and Y.F. and J.C. performed computational analyses of viperin-associated nucleotide kinases. F.W. and A.B. supervised the project. H.S., H.G., F.W. and A.B. wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the review of the manuscript and provided final approval of the work.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Fabai Wu or Aude Bernheim.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

H.G. is employed by Generare Bioscience. The other authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Ecology & Evolution thanks John van der Oost and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–10.

Reporting Summary

Peer Review File

Supplementary Table

Supplementary Tables 1–8.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary Data 1–6.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 2

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 3

Statistical source data.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shomar, H., Georjon, H., Feng, Y. et al. Viperin immunity evolved across the tree of life through serial innovations on a conserved scaffold. Nat Ecol Evol 8, 1667–1679 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-024-02463-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-024-02463-z

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology