Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Biological anthropology must reassess museum collections for a more ethical future

Nature Ecology & Evolution volume 7, pages 786–789 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

With growing attention on the remains of people held by museums and universities around the world, we outline ethical considerations that researchers working with human remains in anthropology must bear in mind.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Health sciences students at Virginia Commonwealth University join in prayer for individuals discovered in an abandoned well on campus in 1994.

References

  1. Shapiro, H. L. Am. Anthropol. 61, 371–379 (1959).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. The Field Museum. Human Remains Collection, https://repatriation.fieldmuseum.org/map (2022).

  3. Méheut, C. A Paris museum has 18,000 skulls. It’s reluctant to say whose. New York Times (28 November 2022).

  4. Kiefer, P. Anthropologists are still wrestling with their obligations to the living and dead. popsci.com, https://www.popsci.com/science/anthropology-human-remains-guidelines/ (13 April 2022).

  5. American Anthropological Association. The Commission for the Ethical Treatment of Human Remains (TCETHR). americananthro.org, https://www.americananthro.org/ParticipateAndAdvocate/CommitteeDetail.aspx?ItemNumber=28451 (2021).

  6. Dunnavant, J., Justinvil, D. & Colwell, C. Nature 593, 337–340 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Graham, S., Huffer, D. & Simons, J. Open Archaeol. 8, 196–219 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lepore, J. When Black history is unearthed, who gets to speak for the dead? The New Yorker (4 October 2021).

  9. Harvard University. Report Of The Steering Committee On Human Remains In University Museum Collections (Harvard University, 2022).

  10. Tumin, R. Penn Museum to bury skulls of enslaved people. The New York Times (10 August 2022).

  11. Jones, L. A. Judge tosses opposition to Penn’s plan to rebury Black Philadelphians in Morton Collection. Philadelphia Inquirer (2 February 2023).

  12. Tucker Law Group. The Odyssey of the MOVE Remains: Report of the Independent Investigation into the Demonstrative Display of MOVE Remains at the Penn Museum and Princeton University (Tucker Law Group, 2021).

  13. Blakey, M. L. Mus. Int. 62, 61–68 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Watkins, R. J. Hist. Archaeol. 54, 17–33 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Teeter, W. G., Martinez, D. & Lippert, D. Int. J. Cult. Property 28, 201–209 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. de la Cova, C. in Theoretical Approaches in Bioarchaeology (eds Cheverko, C. M. et al.) 150–169 (Routledge, 2020).

  17. Riding In, J. Ariz. State Law J. 24, 11–34 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Smithsonian Institution. Statement on human remains at the Smithsonian Institution. si.edu, https://www.si.edu/newsdesk/releases/statement-human-remains-smithsonian-institution (2023).

  19. Stevens, M. In a nod to changing norms, Smithsonian adopts policy on ethical returns. New York Times (3 May 2022),

  20. Smithsonian Institution. Smithsonian adopts policy on ethical returns. si.edu, https://www.si.edu/newsdesk/releases/smithsonian-adopts-policy-ethical-returns (2022).

  21. McGlone, P. Human bones, stolen art: Smithsonian tackles its ‘problem’ collections. Washington Post (27 July 2022).

  22. Lans, A. M. Fem. Anthropol. 2, 130–142 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Virginia Commonwealth University. Recommendations. emsw.vcu.edu, https://emsw.vcu.edu/recommendations/ (accessed 6 February 2023).

  24. Flegontov, P. et al. Nature 570, 236–240 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Ortega, R. P. Science 378, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adf1843 (2022).

  26. Austin, R. M. et al. Commun. Biol. 5, 1050 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. David, R. & Collins, J. W. Arch. Dis. Child. 107, 535–536 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bobbette, A. et al. GeoHumanities 7, 647–655 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Eichbaum, Q. G. et al. Acad. Med. 96, 329–335 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Trisos, C. H., Auerbach, J. & Katti, M. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 1205–1212 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anthropology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA

    Chris Stantis & Sabrina B. Sholts

  2. Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

    Chris Stantis

  3. Department of Anthropology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA

    Carlina de la Cova

  4. Repatriation Office, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA

    Dorothy Lippert

Authors
  1. Chris Stantis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Carlina de la Cova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dorothy Lippert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sabrina B. Sholts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris Stantis.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no financial conflicts of interests. The views of D.L. and S.B.S., as federal employees of the National Museum of Natural History, do not necessarily represent those of the Repatriation Program, Department of Anthropology, the National Museum of Natural History or the Smithsonian Institution.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stantis, C., de la Cova, C., Lippert, D. et al. Biological anthropology must reassess museum collections for a more ethical future. Nat Ecol Evol 7, 786–789 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02036-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02036-6

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing