Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Public interest in individual study animals can bolster wildlife conservation

Nature Ecology & Evolution volume 7, pages 478–479 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Scientists have long debated the potential benefits and detriments of assigning names to individual study animals1. Motivated by the goal of maintaining scientific objectivity, some researchers shy away from labelling study subjects with proper names or from publicizing such names1. On the other hand, naming animal study subjects can boost researcher empathy2, and assigning identities to individual study animals is both necessary and customary in behavioural, population and conservation-related studies3,4. Beyond the practical value of naming individual study animals, narratives around animal names have the power to engage the public with conservation initiatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Memorial flowers placed in front of a mural of P-22 in the Silver Lake neighbourhood of Los Angeles.

Sipa US/Alamy Stock Photo.

References

  1. Benson, E. S. Sci. Context 29, 107–128 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Buckmaster, C. A. Lab Anim. 44, 237 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kelly, M. J. et al. J. Zool. 244, 473–488 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Spagnuolo, O. S. B., Lemerle, M. A., Holekamp, K. E. & Wiesel, I. Mamm. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42991-022-00309-4 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Mountain lion P-22 compassionately euthanized following complete health evaluation results. wildlife.ca.gov, https://wildlife.ca.gov/News/mountain-lion-p-22-compassionately-euthanized-following-complete-health-evaluation-results (17 December 2022).

  6. Road Ecology Center, UC Davis. California roadkill observation system, https://www.wildlifecrossing.net/california/ (accessed 19 December 2022).

  7. Wong-Parodi, G. & Feygina, I. Environ. Commun. 15, 571–593 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Carmi, N., Arnon, S. & Orion, N. J. Environ. Educ. 46, 183–201 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Manfredo, M. J., Urquiza-Haas, E. G., Don Carlos, A. W., Bruskotter, J. T. & Dietsch, A. M. Biol. Conserv. 241, 108297 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schueler, D. S. & Newberry, M. G. III Appl. Environ. Educ. Commun. 19, 259–273 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jennings, L. Public gets to name Dallas Zoo’s baby giraffe. Dallas Zoo https://zoohoo.dallaszoo.com/2014/11/05/public-gets-to-name-dallas-zoos-baby-giraffe/ (5 November 2014).

  12. Verma, A., van der Wal, R. & Fischer, A. Ambio 44(Suppl 4), 648–660 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Macdonald, D. W., Jacobsen, K. S., Burnham, D., Johnson, P. J. & Loveridge, A. J. Animals 6, 26 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Jones, M. D., Shanahan, E. A. & McBeth, M. K. The Science of Stories: Applications of the Narrative Policy Framework in Public Policy Analysis (Palgrave MacMillan, 2014).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA

    Christine E. Wilkinson

Authors
  1. Christine E. Wilkinson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine E. Wilkinson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wilkinson, C.E. Public interest in individual study animals can bolster wildlife conservation. Nat Ecol Evol 7, 478–479 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02009-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02009-9

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing