Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The influence of social cues on timing of animal migrations

Nature Ecology & Evolution volume 6, pages 1617–1625 (2022)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Animal migration plays a central role in many ecological and evolutionary processes, yet migratory populations worldwide are increasingly threatened. Adjusting migration timing to match ecosystem phenology is key to survival in dynamic and changing ecosystems, especially in an era of human-induced rapid environmental change. Social cues are increasingly recognized as major components of migratory behaviour, yet a comprehensive understanding of how social cues influence the timing of animal migrations remains elusive. Here, we introduce a framework for assessing the role that social cues, ranging from explicit (for example, active cueing) to implicit (for example, competition), play in animals’ temporal migration decisions across a range of scales. By applying this theoretical lens to a systematic review of published literature, we show that a broad range of social cues frequently mediate migration timing at a range of temporal scales and across highly diverse migratory taxa. We further highlight that while rarely documented, several social cue mechanisms (for example, social learning and density dependency) play important adaptive roles in matching migration timing with ecosystem dynamics. Thus, social cues play a fundamental role in migration timing, with potentially widespread ecological consequences and implications for the conservation of migratory species. Furthermore, our analysis establishes a theoretical basis on which to evaluate future findings on the role of both conspecific and interspecific social cues in this intersection of behavioural ecology and global change biology.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Scales of temporal decisions in migration.
Fig. 2: Categories of social cues that can influence the timing of migration.
Fig. 3: Taxonomic summary of the systematic literature review for case studies documenting the influence of social cues on the timing of an animal migration.
Fig. 4: Case studies identified via systematic review placed along the conceptual framework gradients.

Data availability

Data that support the findings of this study are available from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6574762.

Code availability

’Code that supports the findings of this study is available from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6574762.

References

  1. Alerstam, T., Hedenström, A. & Åkesson, S. Long-distance migration: evolution and determinants. Oikos 103, 247–260 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bauer, S., Lisovski, S. & Hahn, S. Timing is crucial for consequences of migratory connectivity. Oikos 125, 605–612 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bauer, S. & Hoye, B. J. Migratory animals couple biodiversity and ecosystem functioning worldwide. Science 344, 1242552 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fricke, E. C., Ordonez, A., Rogers, H. S. & Svenning, J. C. The effects of defaunation on plants’ capacity to track climate change. Science 214, 210–214 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tucker, M. A. et al. Moving in the Anthropocene: global reductions in terrestrial mammalian movements. Science 359, 466–469 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wilcove, D. S. & Wikelski, M. Going, going, gone: is animal migration disappearing? PLoS Biol. 6, e188 (2008).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Parmesan, C. & Yohe, G. A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change. Nature 421, 37–42 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Walther, G. et al. Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 4126, 389–395 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Teitelbaum, C. S. et al. Experience drives innovation of new migration patterns of whooping cranes in response to global change. Nat. Commun. 7, 12793 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Oestreich, W. K., Chapman, M. S. & Crowder, L. B. A comparative analysis of dynamic management in marine and terrestrial systems. Front. Ecol. Environ. 18, 496–504 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Senzaki, M. et al. Sensory pollutants alter bird phenology and fitness across a continent. Nature 587, 605–609 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Guerra, A. S. Wolves of the sea: managing human–wildlife conflict in an increasingly tense ocean. Mar. Policy 99, 369–373 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Abrahms, B. Human–wildlife conflict under climate change. Science 373, 484–485 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Both, C., Bouwhuis, S., Lessells, C. M. & Visser, M. E. Climate change and population declines in a long-distance migratory bird. Nature 441, 81–83 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Post, E. & Forchhammer, M. C. Climate change reduces reproductive success of an Arctic herbivore through trophic mismatch. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 363, 2369–2375 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Winkler, D. W. et al. Cues, strategies, and outcomes: how migrating vertebrates track environmental change. Mov. Ecol. 2, 10 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Xu, W. et al. The plasticity of ungulate migration in a changing world. Ecology 102, e03293 (2021).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McNamara, J. M., Barta, Z., Klaassen, M. & Bauer, S. Cues and the optimal timing of activities under environmental change. Ecol. Lett. 14, 1183–1190 (2011).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Bauer, S., McNamara, J. M. & Barta, Z. Environmental variability, reliability of information and the timing of migration. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 287, 20200622 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Abrahms, B. et al. Emerging perspectives on resource tracking and animal movement ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 36, 308–320 (2020).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Visser, M. E., Holleman, L. J. M. & Gienapp, P. Shifts in caterpillar biomass phenology due to climate change and its impact on the breeding biology of an insectivorous bird. Oecologia 147, 164–172 (2006).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Aikens, E. O. et al. Wave-like patterns of plant phenology determine ungulate movement tactics. Curr. Biol. 30, 3444–3449 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Abrahms, B. et al. Memory and resource tracking drive blue whale migrations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 5582–5587 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Lank, D. B., Butler, R. W., Ireland, J. & Ydenberg, R. C. Effects of predation danger on migration strategies of sandpipers. Oikos 103, 303–319 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sabal, M. C. et al. Predation landscapes influence migratory prey ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 36, 737–749 (2021).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Furey, N. B., Armstrong, J. B., Beauchamp, D. A. & Hinch, S. G. Migratory coupling between predators and prey. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1846–1853 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Altizer, S., Bartel, R. & Han, B. A. Animal migration and infectious disease risk. Science 331, 296–302 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gunnarsson, T., Gill, J., Sigurbjörnsson, T. & Sutherland, W. Arrival synchrony in migratory birds. Nature 431, 646 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Beltran, R. S. et al. Elephant seals time their long-distance migration using a map sense. Curr. Biol. 32, R156–R157 (2022).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Yang, L. H. & Rudolf, V. H. W. Phenology, ontogeny and the effects of climate change on the timing of species interactions. Ecol. Lett. 13, 1–10 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Visser, M. E. & Gienapp, P. Evolutionary and demographic consequences of phenological mismatches. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 879–885 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Furey, N. B. et al. Predator swamping reduces predation risk during nocturnal migration of juvenile salmon in a high-mortality landscape. J. Anim. Ecol. 85, 948–959 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rickbeil, G. J. M. et al. Plasticity in elk migration timing is a response to changing environmental conditions. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 2368–2381 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Schmaljohann, H. & Both, C. The limits of modifying migration speed to adjust to climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 573–576 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gwinner, E. Circadian and circannual programmes in avian migration. J. Exp. Biol. 199, 39–48 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Liedvogel, M., Åkesson, S. & Bensch, S. The genetics of migration on the move. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 561–569 (2011).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hauser, D. D. W. et al. Decadal shifts in autumn migration timing by Pacific Arctic beluga whales are related to delayed annual sea ice formation. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 2206–2217 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Palacín, C., Alonso, J. C., Alonso, J. A., Magaña, M. & Martín, C. A. Cultural transmission and flexibility of partial migration patterns in a long-lived bird, the great bustard Otis tarda. J. Avian Biol. 42, 301–308 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Couzin, I. D. Collective animal migration. Curr. Biol. 28, R976–R980 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Guttal, V. & Couzin, I. D. Social interactions, information use, and the evolution of collective migration. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 16172–16177 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Berdahl, A. M. et al. Collective animal navigation and migratory culture: from theoretical models to empirical evidence. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 373, 20170009 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Cohen, E. B. & Satterfield, D. A. ‘Chancing on a spectacle:’ co-occurring animal migrations and interspecific interactions. Ecography 43, 1657–1671 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Berdahl, A., Torney, C. J., Ioannou, C. C., Faria, J. J. & Couzin, I. D. Emergent sensing of complex environments by mobile animal groups. Science 339, 574–576 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Abrahms, B., Teitelbaum, C. S., Mueller, T. & Converse, S. J. Ontogenetic shifts from social to experiential learning drive avian migration timing. Nat. Commun. 12, 7326 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Sasaki, T. & Biro, D. Cumulative culture can emerge from collective intelligence in animal groups. Nat. Commun. 8, 15049 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Helm, B., Piersma, T. & van der Jeugd, H. Sociable schedules: interplay between avian seasonal and social behaviour. Anim. Behav. 72, 245–262 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Piersma, T., Zwarts, L. & Bruggemann, J. H. Behavioural aspects of the departure of waders before long-distance flights: flocking, vocalizations, flight paths and diurnal timing. Ardea 78, 157–184 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Dingle, H. & Drake, V. A. What is migration? BioScience 57, 113–121 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Oestreich, W. K. & Aiu, K. M. Code and data from: The influence of social cues on timing of animal migrations. Zenodo https://zenodo.org/record/6574762 (2022).

  50. Furey, N. B., Martins, E. G. & Hinch, S. G. Migratory salmon smolts exhibit consistent interannual depensatory predator swamping: effects on telemetry-based survival estimates. Ecol. Freshw. Fish 30, 18–30 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Berdahl, A., Westley, P. A. H. & Quinn, T. P. Social interactions shape the timing of spawning migrations in an anadromous fish. Anim. Behav. 126, 221–229 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Louca, V., Lindsay, S. W. & Lucas, M. C. Factors triggering floodplain fish emigration: importance of fish density and food availability. Ecol. Freshw. Fish 18, 60–64 (2009).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Bastille-Rousseau, G. et al. Migration triggers in a large herbivore: Galápagos giant tortoises navigating resource gradients on volcanoes. Ecology 100, e02658 (2019).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Bracis, C. & Mueller, T. Memory, not just perception, plays an important role in terrestrial mammalian migration. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 284, 20170449 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Barrett, B., Zepeda, E., Pollack, L., Munson, A. & Sih, A. Counter-culture: does social learning help or hinder adaptive response to human-induced rapid environmental change? Front. Ecol. Evol. 7, 183 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Merkle, J. A. et al. Site fidelity as a maladaptive behavior in the Anthropocene. Front. Ecol. Environ. 20, 187–194 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Teske, P. R. et al. The sardine run in southeastern Africa is a mass migration into an ecological trap. Sci. Adv. 7, eabf4514 (2021).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Corten, A. The role of ‘conservatism’ in herring migrations. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 11, 339–361 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Mukhin, A., Chernetsov, N. & Kishkinev, D. Acoustic information as a distant cue for habitat recognition by nocturnally migrating passerines during landfall. Behav. Ecol. 19, 716–723 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Barker, K. J. et al. Toward a new framework for restoring lost wildlife migrations. Conserv. Lett. 15, e12850 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Teitelbaum, C. S., Converse, S. J. & Mueller, T. The importance of early life experience and animal cultures in reintroductions. Conserv. Lett. 12, e12599 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Hughey, L. F., Hein, A. M., Strandburg-Peshkin, A., Jensen, F. H. & Hughey, L. F. Challenges and solutions for studying collective animal behaviour in the wild. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 373, 20170005 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Calabrese, J. M. et al. Disentangling social interactions and environmental drivers in multi-individual wildlife tracking data. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 373, 20170007 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Jesmer, B. R. et al. Is ungulate migration culturally transmitted? Evidence of social learning from translocated animals. Science 361, 1023–1025 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Bousquet, C. A. H., Sumpter, D. J. T. & Manser, M. B. Moving calls: a vocal mechanism underlying quorum decisions in cohesive groups. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 278, 1482–1488 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Dibnah, A. J. et al. Vocally mediated consensus decisions govern mass departures from jackdaw roosts. Curr. Biol. 32, R455–R456 (2022).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Robart, A. R., Zuñiga, H. X., Navarro, G. & Watts, H. E. Social environment influences termination of nomadic migration. Biol. Lett. 18, 20220006 (2022).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Dodson, S., Abrahms, B., Bograd, S. J., Fiechter, J. & Hazen, E. L. Disentangling the biotic and abiotic drivers of emergent migratory behavior using individual-based models. Ecol. Modell. 432, 109225 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Kays, R., Crofoot, M. C., Jetz, W. & Wikelski, M. Terrestrial animal tracking as an eye on life and planet. Science 348, aaa2478 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Hussey, N. E. et al. Aquatic animal telemetry: a panoramic window into the underwater world. Science 348, 1255642 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Oestreich, W. K. et al. Acoustic signature reveals blue whale tune life history transitions to oceanographic conditions. Funct. Ecol. 36, 882–895 (2022).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Chapman, J. W., Reynolds, D. R. & Smith, A. D. Vertical-looking radar: a new tool for monitoring high-altitude insect migration. BioScience 53, 503–511 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Oestreich, W. K. et al. Animal-borne metrics enable acoustic detection of blue whale migration. Curr. Biol. 30, 4773–4779 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Fraser, K. C., Shave, A., de Greef, E., Siegrist, J. & Garroway, C. J. Individual variability in migration timing can explain long-term, population-level advances in a songbird. Front. Ecol. Evol. 7, 324 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Byholm, P., Beal, M., Isaksson, N., Lötberg, U. & Åkesson, S. Paternal transmission of migration knowledge in a long-distance bird migrant. Nat. Commun. 13, 1566 (2022).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Schneider, S. S. & McNally, L. C. Waggle dance behavior associated with seasonal absconding in colonies of the African honey bee, Apis mellifera scutellata. Insectes Soc. 41, 115–127 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Raveling, D. G. Preflight and flight behavior of Canada geese. Auk 86, 671–681 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Tennessen, J. B., Parks, S. E. & Langkilde, T. Traffic noise causes physiological stress and impairs breeding migration behaviour in frogs. Conserv. Physiol. 2, cou032 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Lagarde, A., Lagarde, F. & Piersma, T. Vocal signalling by Eurasian spoonbills Platalea leucorodia in flocks before migratory departure. Ardea 109, 243–250 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Rees, E. C. Conflict of choice within pairs of Bewick’s swans regarding their migratory movement to and from the wintering grounds. Anim. Behav. 35, 1685–1693 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Mazeroll, A. I. & Montgomery, W. L. Daily migrations of a coral reef fish in the Red Sea (Gulf of Aqaba, Israel). Copiea 1998, 893–905 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Méndez, V. et al. Paternal effects in the initiation of migratory behaviour in birds. Sci. Rep. 11, 2782 (2021).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Nelson, M. E. Development of migratory behavior in northern white-tailed deer. Can. J. Zool. 76, 426–432 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Sweanor, P. Y. & Sandgren, F. Winter-range philopatry of seasonally migratory moose. J. Appl. Ecol. 26, 25–33 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Rees, E. C. Consistency in the timing of migration for individual Bewick’s swans. Anim. Behav. 38, 384–393 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Corten, A. A possible adaptation of herring feeding migrations to a change in timing of the Calanus finmarchicus season in the eastern North Sea. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 57, 1261–1270 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Loonstra, A. J. et al. Individual black-tailed godwits do not stick to single routes: a hypothesis on how low population densities might decrease social conformity. Ardea 107, 251–261 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Hake, M., Kjellén, N. & Alerstam, T. Age‐dependent migration strategy in honey buzzards Pernis apivorus tracked by satellite. Oikos 103, 385–396 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Gupte, P. R., Koffijberg, K., Müskens, G. J. D. M., Wikelski, M. & Kölzsch, A. Family size dynamics in wintering geese. J. Ornithol. 160, 363–375 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  90. Gonçalves, M. I. C. et al. Movement patterns of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) reoccupying a Brazilian breeding ground. Biota Neotrop. 18, e20180567 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  91. Trudelle, L. et al. First insights on spatial and temporal distribution patterns of humpback whales in the breeding ground at Sainte Marie Channel, Madagascar. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 40, 75–86 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  92. De La Gala-Hernández, S. R., Heckel, G. & Sumich, J. L. Comparative swimming effort of migrating gray whales (Eschrichtius robustus) and calf cost of transport along Costa Azul, Baja California, Mexico. Can. J. Zool. 86, 307–313 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  93. Sword, G. A. Local population density and the activation of movement in migratory band-forming Mormon crickets. Anim. Behav. 69, 437–444 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  94. Buhl, J. et al. From disorder to order in marching locusts. Science 312, 1402–1406 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Mysterud, A., Loe, L. E., Zimmermann, B., Bischof, R. & Meisingset, E. Partial migration in expanding red deer populations at northern latitudes—a role for density dependence? Oikos 120, 1817–1825 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  96. Bukreeva, O. M. & Lidzhi-garyaeva, G. V. Mass migration of social voles (Microtus socialis Pallas, 1773) in the Northwestern Caspian region. Arid Ecosyst. 8, 147–151 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  97. Eggeman, S. L., Hebblewhite, M., Bohm, H., Whittington, J. & Merrill, E. H. Behavioural flexibility in migratory behaviour in a long-lived large herbivore. J. Anim. Ecol. 85, 785–797 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Weithman, C. et al. Senescence and carryover effects of reproductive performance influence migration, condition, and breeding propensity in a small shorebird. Ecol. Evol. 7, 11044–11056 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Rappole, J. H. & Warner, D. W. Relationships between behavior, physiology and weather in avian transients at a migration stopover site. Oecologia 212, 193–212 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  100. Fauchald, P., Mauritzen, M. & Gjøsæter, H. Density‐dependent migratory waves in the marine pelagic ecosystem. Ecology 87, 2915–2924 (2006).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Makris, N. C. et al. Critical population density triggers rapid formation of vast oceanic fish shoals. Science 323, 1734–1737 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Tøttrup, A. P. & Thorup, K. Sex-differentiated migration patterns, protandry and phenology in North European songbird populations. J. Ornithol. 149, 161–167 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  103. Francis, C. M. & Cooke, C. F. Differential timing of spring migration in rose-breasted grosbeaks. J. Field Ornithol. 61, 404–412 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  104. Corgos, A., Verísimo, P. & Freire, J. Timing and seasonality of the terminal molt and mating migration in the spider crab, Maja brachydactyla: evidence of alternative mating strategies. J. Shellfish Res. 25, 577–587 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  105. Gordo, O., Sanz, J. J. & Lobo, J. M. Spatial patterns of white stork (Ciconia ciconia) migratory phenology in the Iberian Peninsula. J. Ornithol. 148, 293–308 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  106. Sergio, F. et al. Individual improvements and selective mortality shape lifelong migratory performance. Nature 515, 410–413 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Manica, L. T., Graves, J. A., Podos, J. & Macedo, R. H. Hidden leks in a migratory songbird: mating advantages for earlier and more attractive males. Behav. Ecol. 31, 1180–1191 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  108. Cade, D. E. et al. Social exploitation of extensive, ephemeral, environmentally controlled prey patches by supergroups of rorqual whales. Anim. Behav. 182, 251–266 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  109. Urbanek, R. P., Fondow, L. E. A., Zimorski, S. E., Wellington, M. A. & Nipper, M. A. Winter release and management of reintroduced migratory whooping cranes Grus americana. Bird Conserv. Int. 20, 43–54 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  110. Németh, Z. & Moore, F. R. Information acquisition during migration: a social perspective. Auk 131, 186–194 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

W.K.O. was supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program, as a David and Lucile Packard Foundation Stanford graduate fellow, and by the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute postdoctoral fellowship program. K.M.A. was supported by the Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment’s Mentoring Undergraduates in Interdisciplinary Research programme. A.M.B. was supported by the H. Mason Keeler Endowed Professorship in Sports Fisheries Management.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hopkins Marine Station, Department of Biology, Stanford University, Pacific Grove, CA, USA

    William K. Oestreich, Larry B. Crowder & Megan F. McKenna

  2. Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, Moss Landing, CA, USA

    William K. Oestreich

  3. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

    Kanoe M. Aiu

  4. School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Andrew M. Berdahl

  5. Center for Ecosystem Sentinels, Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Briana Abrahms

Authors
  1. William K. Oestreich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kanoe M. Aiu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Larry B. Crowder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Megan F. McKenna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Andrew M. Berdahl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Briana Abrahms
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

W.K.O. led the writing of the paper with contributions and editing from K.M.A., L.B.C., M.F.M., A.M.B. and B.A. W.K.O. and K.M.A. led the systematic review process with contributions from L.B.C., M.F.M., A.M.B. and B.A. W.K.O., K.M.A. and B.A. conceptualized the study.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William K. Oestreich.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Ecology & Evolution thanks Emily Cohen, Takao Sasaki and María del Mar Delgado for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oestreich, W.K., Aiu, K.M., Crowder, L.B. et al. The influence of social cues on timing of animal migrations. Nat Ecol Evol 6, 1617–1625 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-022-01866-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-022-01866-0

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing