Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Matters Arising
  • Published:

Reply to: Conclusions of low extinction risk for most species of reef-building corals are premature

The Original Article was published on 14 February 2022

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Dietzel, A., Bode, M., Connolly, S. R. & Hughes, T. P. The population sizes and global extinction risk of reef-building coral species at biogeographic scales. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 663–669 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hubbell, S. P. et al. How many tree species are there in the Amazon and how many of them will go extinct? Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 11498–11504 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Carpenter, K. E. et al. One-third of reef-building corals face elevated extinction risk from climate change and local impacts. Science 321, 560–563 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Muir, P. R. et al. Conclusions of low extinction risk for most species of reef-building corals are premature. Nat. Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-022-01659-5 (2022).

  5. Richards, Z. T., Syms, C., Wallace, C. C., Muir, P. R. & Willis, B. L. Multiple occupancy–abundance patterns in staghorn coral communities. Divers. Distrib. 19, 884–895 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zvuloni, A., Artzy-Randrup, Y., Stone, L., van Woesik, R. & Loya, Y. Ecological size–frequency distributions: how to prevent and correct biases in spatial sampling. Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods 6, 144–153 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed equally to drafting this response.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Dietzel.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Ecology & Evolution thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dietzel, A., Bode, M., Connolly, S.R. et al. Reply to: Conclusions of low extinction risk for most species of reef-building corals are premature. Nat Ecol Evol 6, 359–360 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-022-01660-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-022-01660-y

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing