Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Matters Arising
  • Published:

Conclusions of low extinction risk for most species of reef-building corals are premature

Matters Arising to this article was published on 14 February 2022

The Original Article was published on 01 March 2021

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Dietzel, A., Bode, M., Connolly, S. R. & Hughes, T. P. The population sizes and global extinction risk of reef-building coral species at biogeographic scales. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 663–669 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Richards, Z. T., van Oppen, M. J., Wallace, C. C., Willis, B. L. & Miller, D. J. Some rare Indo-Pacific coral species are probable hybrids. PLoS ONE 3, e3240 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carpenter, K. E. et al. One-third of reef-building corals face elevated extinction risk from climate change and local impacts. Science 321, 560–563 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Richards, Z. T., Syms, C., Wallace, C. C., Muir, P. R. & Willis, B. L. Multiple occupancy–abundance patterns in staghorn coral communities. Divers. Distrib. 19, 84–895 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hoeksema, B. W. & Cairns, S. World List of Scleractinia (accessed 6 May 2021); http://www.marinespecies.org/scleractinia

  6. Hughes, T. P. et al. Global warming transforms coral reef assemblages. Nature 556, 493–496 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Thurba, R. V. et al. Deciphering coral disease dynamics: integrating host, microbiome, and the changing environment. Front. Ecol. Evol. 8, 575927 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Muir, P. R., Marshall, P. A., Abdulla, A. & Aguirre, J. D. Species identity and depth predict bleaching severity in reef building corals: shall the deep inherit the reef? Proc. R. Soc. B 284, 20171551 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. van Woesik, R., Sakai, K., Ganase, A. & Loya, Y. Revisiting the winners and the losers a decade after coral bleaching. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 434, 67–76 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, Y.-H., Shertzer, K. W. & Viehman, T. S. Spatio-temporal dynamics of the threatened elkhorn coral Acropora palmata: implications for conservation. Divers. Distrib. 26, 1582–1597 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sheppard, C., Sheppard, A. & Fenner, D. Coral mass mortalities in the Chagos Archipelago over 40 years: regional species and assemblage extinctions and indications of positive feedbacks. Mar. Poll. Bull. 154, 111075 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. DeVantier, L. & Turak, E. Species richness and relative abundance of reef-building corals in the Indo-West Pacific. Diversity 9, 25 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wallace, C. C. Staghorn Corals of the World (CSIRO, 1999).

  14. Benzoni, F., Stefani, F., Pichon, M. & Galli, P. The name game: morpho-molecular species boundaries in the genus Psammocora (Cnidaria, Scleractinia). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 160, 421–456 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Richards, Z. T., Berry, O. & van Oppen, M. J. H. Cryptic genetic divergence within threatened species of Acropora coral from the Indian and Pacific Oceans. Conserv. Genet. 17, 577–591 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sheets, E. A., Warner, P. A. & Palumbi, S. R. Accurate population genetic measurements require cryptic species identification in corals. Coral Reefs 37, 549–563 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bongaerts, P. et al. Morphological stasis masks ecologically divergent coral species on tropical reefs. Curr. Biol. 31, 2286–2298 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Frankham, R. Effective population size/adult population size ratios in wildlife: a review. Genet. Res. 89, 491–503 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank C. Wallace for expert taxonomic advice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

P.R.M. conceived the initial draft, with D.O.O., B.W.H., C.S., Z.T.R. and M.P. all contributing to the final submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul R. Muir.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Ecology & Evolution thanks Emily Darling and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Table 1.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Muir, P.R., Obura, D.O., Hoeksema, B.W. et al. Conclusions of low extinction risk for most species of reef-building corals are premature. Nat Ecol Evol 6, 357–358 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-022-01659-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-022-01659-5

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing