Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Include biodiversity representation indicators in area-based conservation targets

Nature Ecology & Evolution volume 6, pages 123–126 (2022)Cite this article

Subjects

Advances in spatial biodiversity science and nationally available data have enabled the development of indicators that report on biodiversity outcomes, account for uneven global biodiversity between countries, and provide direct planning support. We urge their inclusion in the post-2020 global biodiversity framework.

In 2022, parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) will assemble in Kunming, China to agree on the post-2020 global biodiversity framework1 (GBF). Addressing threats that contribute to species extinctions and affect their role in ensuring ecosystem integrity underpins the GBF’s overarching Goal A, which stipulates “healthy and resilient populations of all species” and “reduced extinction rates”. Although multiple actions are needed to safeguard biodiversity, establishing targets for protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs) is recognized as a primary mechanism to achieve Goal A.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

Buy

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Measuring the transboundary nature of area-based biodiversity conservation.
Fig. 2: Example of four countries with differing divergence in protected area coverage and biodiversity outcomes as measured by the country SPI for terrestrial vertebrates.

References

  1. Report of the Open-Ended Working Group on the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework on its Third Meeting (Part I) CBD/WG2020/3/5 (CBD, 2021).

  2. Maxwell, S. L. et al. Nature 586, 217–227 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Protected Planet Live Report 2021 (UNEP-WCMC, IUCN, NGS, 2021).

  4. Díaz, S. et al. Science 366, eaax3100 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Visconti, P. et al. Science 364, 239–241 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Maron, M. et al. Conserv. Lett. 14, e12816 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pressey, R. L. et al. Trends Ecol. Evol. 36, 808–821 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Service (IPBES Secretariat, 2019).

  9. Living Planet Report 2020 (WWF, 2020).

  10. Jetz, W. et al. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 539–551 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Powers, R. P. & Jetz, W. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 323–329 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wilson, E. O. Half-Earth: Our Planet’s Fight for Life (WW Norton & Company, 2016).

  13. Sala, E. et al. Nature 592, 397–402 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rinnan, D. S., Sica, Y., Ranipeta, A., Wilshire, J. & Jetz, W. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.05.936047 (2020).

  15. Beger, M. et al. Nat. Commun. 6, 8208 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Armstrong, C. Conserv. Biol. 33, 554–560 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework: Scientific and Technical Information to Support the Review of the Updated Goals and Targets, and Related Indicators and Baselines CBD/SBSTTA/24/3 (CBD, 2020).

  18. Moilanen, A., Wilson, K. A. & Possingham, H. Spatial Conservation Prioritization: Quantitative Methods and Computational Tools (Oxford Univ. Press, 2009).

  19. Jung, M. et al. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 1499–1509 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Navarro, L. M. et al. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 29, 158–169 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jantke, K., Kuempel, C. D., McGowan, J., Chauvenet, A. L. M. & Possingham, H. P. Divers. Distrib. 25, 170–175 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bhola, N. et al. Conserv. Biol. 35, 168–178 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hansen, A. J. et al. Conserv. Lett. 14, e12822 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Measuring Ecosystem Integrity (Goal A) in the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework: The Geo Bon Species Habitat Index CBD/WG2020/3/INF/6 (CBD Secretariat, 2021).

  25. Rondinini, C. & Visconti, P. Conserv. Biol. 29, 1028–1036 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. McGeoch, M. A. et al. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.26.457851 (2021).

  27. Hoskins, A. J. et al. Environ. Model. Softw. 132, 104806 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Adams, V. M., Visconti, P., Graham, V. & Possingham, H. P. One Earth 4, 901–906 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Heiner, M. et al. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 1, e110 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknwowledge funding from National Aeronautics and Space Administration grant 80NSSC18K0435 to W.J. and from the E.O. Wilson Biodiversity Foundation to W.J. and D.S.R.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA

    Walter Jetz, Jennifer McGowan & D. Scott Rinnan

  2. Center for Biodiversity and Global Change, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA

    Walter Jetz, Jennifer McGowan & D. Scott Rinnan

  3. E.O. Wilson Biodiversity Foundation, Durham, NC, USA

    Walter Jetz

  4. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA, USA

    Jennifer McGowan

  5. School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia

    Hugh P. Possingham

  6. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria

    Piero Visconti

  7. Campaign for Nature, Durango, CO, USA

    Brian O’Donnell

  8. The Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Research on Biological Resources, Bogotá, DC, Colombia

    Maria Cecilia Londoño-Murcia

Authors
  1. Walter Jetz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jennifer McGowan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. Scott Rinnan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hugh P. Possingham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Piero Visconti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Brian O’Donnell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Maria Cecilia Londoño-Murcia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Walter Jetz.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary text, Fig. 1 and references.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jetz, W., McGowan, J., Rinnan, D.S. et al. Include biodiversity representation indicators in area-based conservation targets. Nat Ecol Evol 6, 123–126 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01620-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01620-y

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing