Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Matters Arising
  • Published:

Empirical pressure-response relations can benefit assessment of safe operating spaces

Matters Arising to this article was published on 03 June 2021

The Original Article was published on 17 August 2020

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout


  1. Hillebrand, H. et al. Thresholds for ecological responses to global change do not emerge from empirical data. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 1502–1509 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Biggs, R. O., Peterson, G. D. & Rocha, J. C. C. The Regime Shifts Database: a framework for analyzing regime shifts in social-ecological systems. Ecol. Soc. 23, 9 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Diaz, R. J. & Rosenberg, R. Spreading dead zones and consequences for marine ecosystems. Science 321, 926–929 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Walker, B. & Meyers, J. A. Thresholds in ecological and social–ecological systems: a developing database. Ecol. Soc. 9, 3 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hirota, M., Holmgren, M., Van Nes, E. H. & Scheffer, M. Global resilience of tropical forest and savanna to critical transitions. Science 334, 232–235 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Scheffer, M. et al. Creating a safe operating space for iconic ecosystems. Science 347, 1317–1319 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Eppinga, M. B. et al. Long-term transients help explain regime shifts in consumer-renewable resource systems. Commun. Earth Environ. 2, 42 (2021).

  8. Hughes, T. P., Linares, C., Dakos, V., van de Leemput, I. A. & van Nes, E. H. Living dangerously on borrowed time during slow, unrecognized regime shifts. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28, 149–155 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dakos, V., Carpenter, S. R., van Nes, E. H. & Scheffer, M. Resilience indicators: prospects and limitations for early warnings of regime shifts. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 370, 20130263 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Santos, F. C. & Pacheco, J. M. Risk of collective failure provides an escape from the tragedy of the commons. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 10421–10425 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rocha, J. C., Schill, C., Saavedra-Díaz, L. M., Del Pilar Moreno, R. & Maldonado, J. H. Cooperation in the face of thresholds, risk, and uncertainty: experimental evidence in fisher communities from Colombia. PLoS ONE 15, e0242363 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Barrett, S. & Dannenberg, A. Climate negotiations under scientific uncertainty. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 17372–17376 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tengö, M., Brondizio, E. S., Elmqvist, T., Malmer, P. & Spierenburg, M. Connecting diverse knowledge systems for enhanced ecosystem governance: the multiple evidence base approach. Ambio 43, 579–591 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Peterson, G. D., Carpenter, S. R. & Brock, W. A. Uncertainty and the management of multistate ecosystems: an apparently rational route to collapse. Ecology 84, 1403–1411 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Vea, E. B., Ryberg, M., Richardson, K. & Hauschild, M. Z. Framework to define environmental sustainability boundaries and a review of current approaches. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 103003 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McCool, S. F. Planning for sustainable nature dependent tourism development. Tour. Recreat. Res. 19, 51–55 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bruckner, T., Petschel-Held, G., Leimbach, M. & Toth, F. L. Methodological aspects of the tolerable windows approach. Clim. Change 56, 73–89 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. UN Environment Programme. Convention on Biological Diversity. Aichi Biodiversity Targets (2010).

  19. Dearing, J. A. et al. Safe and just operating spaces for regional social-ecological systems. Glob. Environ. Change 28, 227–238 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Strassburg, B. B. N. et al. Global priority areas for ecosystem restoration. Nature 586, 724–729 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank J. Rockström, W. Steffen, G. Peterson, V. Galaz, B. Reyers, S. Cornell, J. Kuiper and H. Hillebrand for their comments on this manuscript. L.W.-E. is funded by the ERC Advanced grant no. ERC-2016-ADG 743080 (Earth Resilience in the Anthropocene Project).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



S.J.L., L.W.-E., A.S. and J.C.R. conceived and wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven J. Lade.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Ecology & Evolution thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lade, S.J., Wang-Erlandsson, L., Staal, A. et al. Empirical pressure-response relations can benefit assessment of safe operating spaces. Nat Ecol Evol 5, 1078–1079 (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene