Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

ECO-EVOLUTIONARY DYNAMICS

Ecological recipes for selecting community function

Simulations of eco-evolutionary processes involved in artificial selection of microbial communities provide a guide to optimize experimental design for improving ecosystem functions.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Schematic representation of ecology in an experiment of microbial community selection.

References

  1. 1.

    Doolittle, W. F. & Zhaxybayeva, O. BioScience 60, 102–112 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Liautaud, K., van Nes, E. H., Barbier, M., Scheffer, M. & Loreau, M. Ecol. Lett. 22, 1243–1252 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Morris, A., Meyer, K. & Bohannan, B. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 375, 20190244 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    De Monte, S. & Rainey, P. B. J. Biosci. 39, 237–248 (2014).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Chang, C.-Y. et al. Nat. Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01457-5 (2021).

  6. 6.

    Goldford, J. E. et al. Science 361, 469–474 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Machado, D. et al. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 195–203 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Ratzke, C., Barrere, J. & Gore, J. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 376–383 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Wright, E. S. & Vetsigian, K. H. Nat. Commun. 7, 11274 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Szathmáry, E. & Demeter, L. J. Theor. Biol. 128, 463–486 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Xie, L., Yuan, A. E. & Shou, W. PLoS Biol. 17, e3000295 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    van Vliet, S. & Doebeli, M. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 20591–20597 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Doulcier, G., Lambert, A., De Monte, S. & Rainey, P. B. eLife 9, e53433 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Black, A. J., Bourrat, P. & Rainey, P. B. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 426–436 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Williams, H. T. P. & Lenton, T. M. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 8918–8923 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Barbier, M., Arnoldi, J.-F., Bunin, G. & Loreau, M. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 2156–2161 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Pearce, M. T., Agarwala, A. & Fisher, D. S. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 14572–14583 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Roy, F., Barbier, M., Biroli, G. & Bunin, G. PLoS Comput. Biol. 16, e1007827 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silvia De Monte.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

De Monte, S. Ecological recipes for selecting community function. Nat Ecol Evol 5, 894–895 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01467-3

Download citation

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing