Deforestation, a significant threat to biodiversity, is accelerated by global demand for commodities. Although prior literature has linked deforestation to global supply chains, here we provide a fine-scale representation of spatial patterns of deforestation associated with international trade. Using remote sensing data and a multi-region input–output model, we quantify and map the spatiotemporal changes in global deforestation footprints over 15 years (2001–2015) at a 30-m resolution. We find that, while many developed countries, China and India have obtained net forest gains domestically, they have also increased the deforestation embodied in their imports, of which tropical forests are the most threatened biome. Consumption patterns of G7 countries drive an average loss of 3.9 trees per person per year. Some of the hotspots of deforestation embodied in international trade are also biodiversity hotspots, such as in Southeast Asia, Madagascar, Liberia, Central America and the Amazonian rainforest. Our results emphasize the need to reform zero-deforestation policies through strong transnational efforts and by improving supply chain transparency, public–private engagement and financial support for the tropics.
Your institute does not have access to this article
Open Access articles citing this article.
Shifting agriculture is the dominant driver of forest disturbance in threatened forest species’ ranges
Communications Earth & Environment Open Access 12 May 2022
Sustainability Science Open Access 12 May 2022
Subscribe to Nature+
Get immediate online access to the entire Nature family of 50+ journals
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $9.92 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
The results, calculated as described in the Methods, are based on the data from the Global Forest Watch (https://www.globalforestwatch.org), FAOSTAT (http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/RL), EliScholar (https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/yale_fes_data/1/) and Eora MRIO (https://worldmrio.com) databases, all of which are publicly available. The plantation mask data are available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12661145.v2. Maps for each G20 country are provided in Supplementary Fig. 6. The raster files (GeoTIFF) of these maps are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Programming code used for analysis is available from the corresponding author on request.
Pan, Y., Birdsey, R. A., Phillips, O. L. & Jackson, R. B. The structure, distribution, and biomass of the world’s forests. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 44, 593–622 (2013).
UN FAO Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015: How Are the World’s Forests Changing? (FAO Interdepartmental Working Group, 2016).
Douglas, I. in Encyclopedia of the Anthropocene (eds Dellasala, D. A. & Goldstein, M. I.) 185–197 (Elsevier, 2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809665-9.09206-5
Hassan, R., Scholes, R. & Ash, N. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current State and Trends (Island Press, 2005).
Giri, C. et al. Status and distribution of mangrove forests of the world using earth observation satellite data. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 20, 154–159 (2011).
Sievers, M. et al. The role of vegetated coastal wetlands for marine megafauna conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 34, 807–817 (2019).
Houghton, R. A. The annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use 1850–1990. Tellus B 51, 298–313 (1999).
Giam, X. Global biodiversity loss from tropical deforestation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 5775–5777 (2017).
D’Almeida, C. et al. The effects of deforestation on the hydrological cycle in Amazonia: a review on scale and resolution. Int. J. Climatol. 27, 633–647 (2007).
Laurance, W. F. et al. Ecosystem decay of amazonian forest fragments: a 22-year investigation. Conserv. Biol. 16, 605–618 (2002).
Qin, Y. et al. Improved estimates of forest cover and loss in the Brazilian Amazon in 2000–2017. Nat. Sustain. 2, 764–772 (2019).
Take action to stop Amazon burning. Nature 573, 163 (2019)
Karstensen, J., Peters, G. P. & Andrew, R. M. Attribution of CO2 emissions from Brazilian deforestation to consumers between 1990 and 2010. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 024005 (2013).
Godar, J., Tizado, E. J. & Pokorny, B. Who is responsible for deforestation in the Amazon? A spatially explicit analysis along the Transamazon Highway in Brazil. For. Ecol. Manag. 267, 58–73 (2012).
Seymour, F. & Harris, N. L. Reducing tropical deforestation. Science 365, 756 (2019).
de Area Leão Pereira, E. J., de Santana Ribeiro, L. C., da Silva Freitas, L. F. & de Barros Pereira, H. B. Brazilian policy and agribusiness damage the Amazon rainforest. Land Use Policy 92, 104491 (2020).
Escobar, H. Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon is still rising sharply. Science 369, 613 (2020).
Pendrill, F. et al. Agricultural and forestry trade drives large share of tropical deforestation emissions. Glob. Environ. Change 56, 1–10 (2019).
Pendrill, F., Persson, U. M., Godar, J. & Kastner, T. Deforestation displaced: trade in forest-risk commodities and the prospects for a global forest transition. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 055003 (2019).
Hosonuma, N. et al. An assessment of deforestation and forest degradation drivers in developing countries. Environ. Res. Lett. 7, 044009 (2012).
Jha, S. & Bawa, K. S. Population growth, human development, and deforestation in biodiversity hotspots. Conserv. Biol. 20, 906–912 (2006).
DeFries, R. S., Rudel, T., Uriarte, M. & Hansen, M. Deforestation driven by urban population growth and agricultural trade in the twenty-first century. Nat. Geosci. 3, 178–181 (2010).
Gibbs, H. K. et al. Tropical forests were the primary sources of new agricultural land in the 1980s and 1990s. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 16732–16737 (2010).
Henders, S., Persson, U. M. & Kastner, T. Trading forests: land-use change and carbon emissions embodied in production and exports of forest-risk commodities. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 125012 (2015).
Lambin, E. F. et al. The role of supply-chain initiatives in reducing deforestation. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 109–116 (2018).
Curtis, P. G., Slay, C. M., Harris, N. L., Tyukavina, A. & Hansen, M. C. Classifying drivers of global forest loss. Science 361, 1108–1111 (2018).
Chen, C. et al. China and India lead in greening of the world through land-use management. Nat. Sustain. 2, 122–129 (2019).
Saikku, L., Soimakallio, S. & Pingoud, K. Attributing land-use change carbon emissions to exported biomass. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 37, 47–54 (2012).
Beckman, J., Sands, R. D., Riddle, A. A., Lee, T. & Walloga, J. M. International Trade and Deforestation: Potential Policy Effects via a Global Economic Model (USDA, 2017); https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uersrr/262185.html
Cuypers, D. et al. The Impact of EU Consumption on Deforestation: Comprehensive Analysis of the Impact of EU consumption on Deforestation (European Commission, 2013).
Zhang, Q. et al. Global timber harvest footprints of nations and virtual timber trade flows. J. Clean. Prod. 250, 119503 (2020).
Hansen, M. C. et al. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342, 850–853 (2013).
Lenzen, M., Kanemoto, K., Moran, D. & Geschke, A. Mapping the structure of the world economy. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 8374–8381 (2012).
Lenzen, M., Moran, D., Kanemoto, K. & Geschke, A. Building Eora: a global multi-region input–output database at high country and sector resolution. Econ. Syst. Res. 25, 20–49 (2013).
Chazdon, R. L. et al. When is a forest a forest? Forest concepts and definitions in the era of forest and landscape restoration. Ambio 45, 538–550 (2016).
Tropek, R. et al. Comment on ‘High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change’. Science 344, 981 (2014).
Moran, D. & Kanemoto, K. Identifying species threat hotspots from global supply chains. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0023 (2017).
Forest Fact Book 2017–2018 (Government of Canada Publications, 2017).
Crowther, T. W. et al. Mapping tree density at a global scale. Nature 525, 201–205 (2015).
Ericsson, K. & Werner, S. The introduction and expansion of biomass use in Swedish district heating systems. Biomass. Bioenergy 94, 57–65 (2016).
Kennedy, C. & Southwood, T. The number of species of insects associated with British trees: a re-analysis. J. Anim. Ecol. 53, 455–478 (1984).
Braun, A. C. H. et al. Assessing the impact of plantation forestry on plant biodiversity: a comparison of sites in Central Chile and Chilean Patagonia. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 10, 159–172 (2017).
Kang, D., Wang, X., Li, S. & Li, J. Comparing the plant diversity between artificial forest and nature growth forest in a giant panda habitat. Sci. Rep. 7, 3561 (2017).
Gamfeldt, L. et al. Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species. Nat. Commun. 4, 1340 (2013).
Erwin, T. L. Tropical forests: their richness in Coleoptera and other arthropod species. Coleopt. Bull. 36, 74–75 (1982).
Gibson, L. et al. Primary forests are irreplaceable for sustaining tropical biodiversity. Nature 478, 378–381 (2011).
Dirzo, R. & Raven, P. H. Global state of biodiversity and loss. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 28, 137–167 (2003).
Bradford, M. & Murphy, H. T. The importance of large-diameter trees in the wet tropical rainforests of Australia. PLoS ONE 14, e0208377 (2019).
Lenzen, M. et al. International trade drives biodiversity threats in developing nations. Nature 486, 109–112 (2012).
Chaudhary, A. & Kastner, T. Land use biodiversity impacts embodied in international food trade. Glob. Environ. Change 38, 195–204 (2016).
Wilting, H. C., Schipper, A. M., Bakkenes, M., Meijer, J. R. & Huijbregts, M. A. J. Quantifying biodiversity losses due to human consumption: a global-scale footprint analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 3298–3306 (2017).
Weinzettel, J., Vačkář, D. & Medková, H. Human footprint in biodiversity hotspots. Front. Ecol. Environ. 16, 447–452 (2018).
Marques, A. et al. Increasing impacts of land use on biodiversity and carbon sequestration driven by population and economic growth. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 628–637 (2019).
Godar, J., Persson, U. M., Tizado, E. J. & Meyfroidt, P. Towards more accurate and policy relevant footprint analyses: tracing fine-scale socio-environmental impacts of production to consumption. Ecol. Econ. 112, 25–35 (2015).
Furumo, P. R. & Lambin, E. F. Scaling up zero-deforestation initiatives through public-private partnerships: a look inside post-conflict Colombia. Glob. Environ. Change 62, 102055 (2020).
Garrett, R. D. et al. Criteria for effective zero-deforestation commitments. Glob. Environ. Change 54, 135–147 (2019).
Blackman, A., Goff, L. & Rivera Planter, M. Does eco-certification stem tropical deforestation? Forest stewardship council certification in mexico. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 89, 306–333 (2018).
Protecting and Restoring Forests: A Story of Large Commitments yet Limited Progress. New York Declaration on Forests Five-Year Assessment Report (NYDF Assessment Partners, 2019).
Meijer, K. S. A comparative analysis of the effectiveness of four supply chain initiatives to reduce deforestation. Trop. Conserv. Sci. 8, 583–597 (2015).
Carvalho, W. D. et al. Deforestation control in the brazilian amazon: a conservation struggle being lost as agreements and regulations are subverted and bypassed. Perspect. Ecol. Conserv. 17, 122–130 (2019).
Green, J. M. H. et al. Linking global drivers of agricultural trade to on-the-ground impacts on biodiversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 23202–23208 (2019).
Nolte, C., le Polain de Waroux, Y., Munger, J., Reis, T. N. P. & Lambin, E. F. Conditions influencing the adoption of effective anti-deforestation policies in South America’s commodity frontiers. Glob. Environ. Change 43, 1–14 (2017).
Godar, J., Gardner, T. A., Tizado, E. J. & Pacheco, P. Actor-specific contributions to the deforestation slowdown in the Brazilian Amazon. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 15591–15596 (2014).
Alix-Garcia, J. M., Sims, K. R. E. & Yañez-Pagans, P. Only one tree from each seed? Environmental effectiveness and poverty alleviation in Mexico’s payments for ecosystem services program. Am. Econ. J.: Econ. Policy 7, 1–40 (2015).
Alix-Garcia, J. M. et al. Payments for environmental services supported social capital while increasing land management. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 7016–7021 (2018).
Börner, J. et al. The effectiveness of payments for environmental services. World Dev. 96, 359–374 (2017).
Jayachandran, S. et al. Cash for carbon: a randomized trial of payments for ecosystem services to reduce deforestation. Science 357, 267–273 (2017).
Annual Review 2017 (PEFC, 2017).
Higgins, V. & Richards, C. Framing sustainability: alternative standards schemes for sustainable palm oil and South–South trade. J. Rural Stud. 65, 126–134 (2019).
Gibbs, H. K. et al. Brazil’s soy moratorium. Science 347, 377–378 (2015).
World Countries (ArcGIS, 2020); https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=d974d9c6bc924ae0a2ffea0a46d71e3d
Hansen, M. et al. Response to comment on ‘High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change’. Science 344, 981 (2014).
Kanemoto, K., Lenzen, M., Peters, G. P., Moran, D. D. & Geschke, A. Frameworks for comparing emissions associated with production, consumption, and international trade. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 172–179 (2012).
Moran, D. & Kanemoto, K. Tracing global supply chains to air pollution hotspots. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 094017 (2016).
Kanemoto, K., Moran, D. & Hertwich, E. G. Mapping the carbon footprint of nations. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 10512–10517 (2016).
Yang, Y. et al. Mapping global carbon footprint in China. Nat. Commun. 11, 2237 (2020).
Sun, Z., Scherer, L., Tukker, A. & Behrens, P. Linking global crop and livestock consumption to local production hotspots. Glob. Food Sec. 25, 100323 (2020).
Global Forest Resource Assessment 2000 FAO Forestry Paper 140 (FAO, 2001).
Sasaki, N. & Putz, F. E. Critical need for new definitions of ‘forest’ and ‘forest degradation’ in global climate change agreements. Conserv. Lett. 2, 226–232 (2009).
Ceccherini, G. et al. Abrupt increase in harvested forest area over Europe after 2015. Nature 583, 72–77 (2020).
Lenzen, M. et al. The Global MRIO Lab – charting the world economy. Econ. Syst. Res. 29, 158–186 (2017).
Moran, D., Giljum, S., Kanemoto, K. & Godar, J. From satellite to supply chain: new approaches connect earth observation to economic decisions. One Earth 3, 5–8 (2020).
You, L., Wood, S., Wood-Sichra, U. & Wu, W. Generating global crop distribution maps: from census to grid. Agric. Syst. 127, 53–60 (2014).
This work was supported by the Research Institute for Humanity and Nature (project no. 14200135), the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science through Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) 18KT0004, and the Moonshot Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Research and Development Program MS509. We thank T. Nakashizuka, J. Fry and O. Taherzadeh for valuable comments, and P. Potapov for technical help in processing Hansen’s data.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information Nature Ecology & Evolution thanks Robin Chazdon and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Methods, Figs. 1–6 and Tables 1–5.
Animation of the cumulative spatial deforestation footprints from 2001 to 2015 for the USA.
1 – ‘Commodity Sector List’ tab: The list of commodities/sectors generated from the MRIO classification; 2 – ‘Agricultural Commodity Ranking’ tab: The table of commodity-induced deforestation rankings for every production country for the entire period 2006–2010.
About this article
Cite this article
Hoang, N.T., Kanemoto, K. Mapping the deforestation footprint of nations reveals growing threat to tropical forests. Nat Ecol Evol 5, 845–853 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01417-z
Shifting agriculture is the dominant driver of forest disturbance in threatened forest species’ ranges
Communications Earth & Environment (2022)
Nature Sustainability (2022)
Environment, Development and Sustainability (2022)
Sustainability Science (2022)
Nature Ecology & Evolution (2021)