Academic leaders must support inclusive scientific communities during COVID-19

To the Editor — The COVID-19 pandemic poses major challenges for all sectors of society, including scientists faced with abrupt disruptions and redirections of research and higher education1. The consequences of this crisis will disproportionately impact early-career scientists; especially those from communities historically underrepresented, disadvantaged and/or discriminated in the fields of environmental sciences, including women, researchers from the Global South and persons with disabilities2. We call for a collective effort by the entire scientific community, especially those in leadership positions, to respond to the short- and long-term challenges of this crisis and to protect decades of efforts to build an inclusive scientific community3.

Diverse and inclusive scientific communities are more productive, innovative and impactful4, but also acutely threatened by the current crisis. Sudden increase in responsibilities for family care, teaching, supervision and administration particularly risks scientists from underrepresented groups becoming severely overburdened5. For example, women are more often responsible for service and student mentorship than their male colleagues in academia, resulting in increased workloads and fewer opportunities for career advancement4,6. The current crisis may also pose disproportionate existential threats to scientists about whose representation and equality is still too little known (for example, ethnic and racial minorities, LGBTQ+, and disabled individuals). Scientists with limited financial or technological resources who depend on temporary income or visas for their work are currently at a distinct disadvantage7, and need support to pursue educational and career opportunities.

Inequalities based on racism and discrimination, such as the disturbing instances of racist attacks on people of Asian descent since the spread of the virus, will affect the international scientific community not only in the next weeks and months8, but over the long term. Coping with the current and long-term consequences of the pandemic requires courageous action at all levels of our scientific community (Fig. 1). The Academic Leadership is especially in demand for actively supporting and protecting the integrity of our field, and building a diversity, equity and inclusion focus into all COVID-19-related recovery efforts in scientific workplaces, communities and broader policies.

Fig. 1: Actions are required at all science levels.

Three ideas for the Academic Leadership to improve diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) in the scientific workplace, at community and institute levels, as well as in broader policy and decision-making.

Fair distribution and recognition of communal tasks build the foundation for a supportive academic environment, but early-career scientists in precarious situations need more than that. Scientific policy and decision-makers need to set up support measures that protect inclusive scientific communities from economic recession, reduced job and funding availability, and increased competition. Increasing job security and resource accessibility creates more healthy work environments, intercepting emotional and financial stress caused by inequality9,10. Overcoming this pandemic requires a strong international scientific community that understands that diversity and equity are key factors in promoting healthy, resilient environments as the cornerstones of human health and well-being9,11.


  1. 1.

    Goymer, P. Covid-19 and Nature Ecology & Evolution. Nature Ecology & Evolution (20 March 2020);

  2. 2.

    National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering NSF 19‐304 (National Science Foundation, 2019);

  3. 3.

    Grogan, K. E. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 3–6 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Jimenez, M. F. et al. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1030–1033 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    O’Brien, K. R. et al. Trends Ecol. Evol. 34, 395–399 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Guarino, C. M. & Borden, V. M. H. Res. High. Educ. 58, 672–694 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Flaherty, C. Next-Level Precarity. Inside HigherEd (10 April 2020);

  8. 8.

    Nature 580, 165 (2020).

  9. 9.

    Pain, E. Why World Mental Health day matters for scientists. Science (10 October 2018);

  10. 10.

    Zivony, A. Nat. Hum. Behav. 3, 1037 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Corlett, R. T. et al. Biol. Conserv. 246, 108571 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bea Maas.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maas, B., Grogan, K.E., Chirango, Y. et al. Academic leaders must support inclusive scientific communities during COVID-19. Nat Ecol Evol (2020).

Download citation