Ancestral primacy of same-sex sexual behaviour does not explain its stable prevalence in modern populations

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Monk, J. D., Giglio, E., Kamath, A., Lambert, M. R. & McDonough, C. E. An alternative hypothesis for the evolution of same-sex sexual behaviour in animals. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1622–1631 (2019).

  2. 2.

    Dixson, A. in Animal Homosexuality (ed. Poiani, A.) 381–400 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010).

  3. 3.

    Lehtonen, J., Parker, G. A. & Schärer, L. Why anisogamy drives ancestral sex roles. Evolution 70, 1129–1135 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Vasey, P. L. Homosexual behavior in primates: a review of evidence and theory. Int. J. Primatol. 16, 173–204 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

T.E.D. and Q.R. contributed equally to the development of the argument. T.E.D. led on the writing and Q.R. made contributions to the writing. T.E.D. produced the final agreed edited version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. E. Dickins.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dickins, T.E., Rahman, Q. Ancestral primacy of same-sex sexual behaviour does not explain its stable prevalence in modern populations. Nat Ecol Evol 4, 782–783 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1187-5

Download citation

Further reading