Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

A new ecosystem for evidence synthesis

Synthesizing evidence is an essential part of scientific progress, but it is often done in a slow and uncoordinated manner, sometimes producing misleading conclusions. Here, we propose the idea of an ‘open synthesis community’ to resolve this pressing issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Open synthesis community.

References

  1. Sánchez-Tójar, A. et al. eLife 7, e37385 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jefferson, T. & Doshi, P. BMJ 348, g2263 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Koricheva, J. & Kulinskaya, E. Trends Ecol. Evol. 34, 895–902 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Borah, R., Brown, A. W., Capers, P. L. & Kaiser, K. A. BMJ Open 7, e012545 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brassey, J. et al. BMJ Evid.-Based Med. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111126 (2019).

  6. Ioannidis, J. P. A. Milbank Q. 94, 485–514 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gurevitch, J., Koricheva, J., Nakagawa, S. & Stewart, G. Nature 555, 175–182 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Seidler, A. L. et al. BMJ 367, l5342 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gerstner, K. et al. Methods Ecol. Evol. 8, 777–784 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Holcombe, A. Nature 571, 147–147 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Elliott, J. H. et al. PLOS Med. 11, e1001603 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nakagawa, S. et al. Trends Ecol. Evol. 34, 224–238 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Westgate, M. J. et al. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 588–590 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Haddaway, N. R. & Crowe, S. Environ. Evid. 7, 11 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Haddaway, N. R. Environ. Evid. 7, 26 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wilkinson, M. D. et al. Sci. Data 3, 160018 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Longo, D. L. & Drazen, J. M. N. Engl. J. Med. 374, 276–277 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. West, J. D., Jacquet, J., King, M. M., Correll, S. J. & Bergstrom, C. T. PLOS ONE 8, e66212 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Grogan, K. E. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 3–6 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Freeman, R. B. & Huang, W. Nature 513, 305 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Begley, C. G. & Ellis, L. M. Nature 483, 531–533 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sholler, D., Ram, K., Boettiger, C. & Katz, D. S. Big Data Soc. 6, https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719836258 (2019).

  23. Culina, A., Crowther, T. W., Ramakers, J. J. C., Gienapp, P. & Visser, M. E. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1053–1056 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kidwell, M. C. et al. PLOS Biol. 14, e1002456 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Vazire, S. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 13, 411–417 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Evidence Synthesis Hackathon 2019 was supported by the Faculty of Science at UNSW Sydney, Fenner School of Environment & Society at the Australian National University, Stockholm Environment Institute and University of Johannesburg. A.S.-T. was partially funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) - Projektnummer 316099922 - TRR 212.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shinichi Nakagawa.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nakagawa, S., Dunn, A.G., Lagisz, M. et al. A new ecosystem for evidence synthesis. Nat Ecol Evol 4, 498–501 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1153-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1153-2

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene