Developmental cost theory predicts thermal environment and vulnerability to global warming

Abstract

Metazoans must develop from zygotes to feeding organisms. In doing so, developing offspring consume up to 60% of the energy provided by their parent. The cost of development depends on two rates: metabolic rate, which determines the rate that energy is used; and developmental rate, which determines the length of the developmental period. Both development and metabolism are highly temperature-dependent such that developmental costs should be sensitive to the local thermal environment. Here, we develop, parameterize and test developmental cost theory, a physiologically explicit theory that reveals that ectotherms have narrow thermal windows in which developmental costs are minimized (Topt). Our developmental cost theory-derived estimates of Topt predict the natural thermal environment of 71 species across seven phyla remarkably well (R2 ~0.83). Developmental cost theory predicts that costs of development are much more sensitive to small changes in temperature than classic measures such as survival. Warming-driven changes to developmental costs are predicted to strongly affect population replenishment and developmental cost theory provides a mechanistic foundation for determining which species are most at risk. Developmental cost theory predicts that tropical aquatic species and most non-nesting terrestrial species are likely to incur the greatest increase in developmental costs from future warming.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Graphical representation of temperature-dependent developmental cost theory.
Fig. 2: Development costs across temperatures for developing ectotherms.
Fig. 3: Effect of developmental environment on mismatch between Topt and Tmid for 71 ectotherms.
Fig. 4: Change in performance associated with a 20% increase (relative to the range experienced by that species) in temperature relative to the thermal optimum.

Data availability

The data used in these meta-analyses are available from Dryad: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.zw3r2284x.

References

  1. 1.

    Mueller, C. A., Joss, J. M. P. & Seymour, R. S. The energy cost of embryonic development in fishes and amphibians, with emphasis on new data from the Australian lungfish, Neoceratodus forsteri. J. Comp. Physiol. B 181, 43–52 (2011).

  2. 2.

    Bennett, C. E. & Marshall, D. J. The relative energetic costs of the larval period, larval swimming and metamorphosis for the ascidian Diplosoma listerianum. Mar. Freshwat. Behav. Physiol. 38, 21–29 (2005).

  3. 3.

    Pettersen, A. K., White, C. R., Bryson-Richardson, R. J. & Marshall, D. J. Linking life-history theory and metabolic theory explains the offspring size-temperature relationship. Ecol. Lett. 22, 518–526 (2019).

  4. 4.

    Kamler, E. Early Life History of Fish—An Energetics Approach, Vol. 4 (Chapman and Hall, 1992).

  5. 5.

    Kamler, E. Parent–egg–progeny relationships in teleost fishes: an energetics perspective. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 15, 399–421 (2005).

  6. 6.

    Zuo, W. Y., Moses, M. E., West, G. B., Hou, C. & Brown, J. H. A general model for effects of temperature on ectotherm ontogenetic growth and development. Proc. R. Soc. B 279, 1840–1846 (2012).

  7. 7.

    Gillooly, J. F., Charnov, E. L., West, G. B., Savage, V. M. & Brown, J. H. Effects of size and temperature on developmental time. Nature 417, 70–73 (2002).

  8. 8.

    Pinsky, M. L., Eikeset, A. M., McCauley, D. J., Payne, J. L. & Sunday, J. M. Greater vulnerability to warming of marine versus terrestrial ectotherms. Nature 569, 108–111 (2019).

  9. 9.

    Pechenik, J. A. Larval experience and latent effects—metamorphosis is not a new beginning. Integr. Comp. Biol. 46, 323–333 (2006).

  10. 10.

    Marshall, D. J., Pettersen, A. K. & Cameron, H. A global synthesis of offspring size variation, its eco-evolutionary causes and consequences. Funct. Ecol. 32, 1436–1446 (2018).

  11. 11.

    Vance, R. R. On reproductive strategies in marine benthic invertebrates. Am. Nat. 107, 339–352 (1973).

  12. 12.

    Shine, R. Manipulative mothers and selective forces: the effects of reproduction on thermoregulation in reptiles. Herpetologica 68, 289–298 (2012).

  13. 13.

    Goller, M., Goller, F. & French, S. S. A heterogeneous thermal environment enables remarkable behavioral thermoregulation in Uta stansburiana. Ecol. Evol. 4, 3319–3329 (2014).

  14. 14.

    Steele, J. H. A comparison of terrestrial and marine ecological systems. Nature 313, 355–358 (1985).

  15. 15.

    Melampy, R. M. & Willis, E. R. Respiratory metabolism during larval and pupal development of the female honeybee (Apis mellifica L.). Physiol. Zool. 12, 302–311 (1939).

  16. 16.

    Seebacher, F., White, C. R. & Franklin, C. E. Physiological plasticity increases resilience of ectothermic animals to climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 61–66 (2014).

  17. 17.

    Berrigan, D. & Partridge, L. Influence of temperature and activity on the metabolic rate of adult Drosophila melanogaster. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 118, 1301–1307 (1997).

  18. 18.

    Alton, L. A., Condon, C., White, C. R. & Angilletta, M. J. Jr Colder environments did not select for a faster metabolism during experimental evolution of Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 71, 145–152 (2017).

  19. 19.

    Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D. & R Core Team. nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3.1-101 (2011).

  20. 20.

    Nakagawa, S. & Lagisz, M. Visualizing unbiased and biased unweighted meta-analyses. J. Evol. Biol. 29, 1914–1916 (2016).

  21. 21.

    Orme, D. The caper Package: Comparative Analysis of Phylogenetics and Evolution in R. R package version 5 (2013).

  22. 22.

    Michonneau, F., Brown, J. W. & Winter, D. J. rot1: an R package to interact with the Open Tree of Life data. Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 1476–1481 (2016).

  23. 23.

    Hinchliff, C. E. et al. Synthesis of phylogeny and taxonomy into a comprehensive tree of life. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 12764–12769 (2015).

  24. 24.

    Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G. & The, P. G. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 6, e1000097 (2009).

  25. 25.

    Pagel, M. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401, 877–884 (1999).

  26. 26.

    Hadfield, J. D. & Nakagawa, S. General quantitative genetic methods for comparative biology: phylogenies, taxonomies and multi-trait models for continuous and categorical characters. J. Evol. Biol. 23, 494–508 (2010).

  27. 27.

    Quinn, G. P. & Keough, M. J. Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2002).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank B. Comerford, M. Parascandalo and L. Morris for assistance. This work was supported by funding to the Centre for Geometric Biology, Monash University.

Author information

D.J.M. conceived the study, collected and analysed the data and wrote the first draft. M.B. developed the mathematical theory. D.J.M. and A.K.P. collected the data. D.J.M. and C.R.W. analysed the data. All authors contributed to subsequent drafts.

Correspondence to Dustin J. Marshall.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary text 1–3, Tables 1–4, Figs. 1–3 and references.

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marshall, D.J., Pettersen, A.K., Bode, M. et al. Developmental cost theory predicts thermal environment and vulnerability to global warming. Nat Ecol Evol 4, 406–411 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1114-9

Download citation

Further reading