Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Researchers using environmental DNA must engage ethically with Indigenous communities

The study of environmental DNA can reveal information about the history and presence of Indigenous communities on their lands — potentially even inadvertently. Better engagement with the ethical aspects of environmental DNA research is required in the field as a whole, and especially for researchers working on Indigenous lands.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Birthing trees.

THPStock.

References

  1. Day, K. et al. Endanger. Species Res. 40, 171–182 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fernandes, K. et al. Restor. Ecol. 26, 1098–1107 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. van der Heyde, M. et al. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 20, 732–745 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Thomsen, P. F. & Willerslev, E. Biol. Conserv. 183, 4–18 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Giguet-Covex, C. et al. Nat. Commun. 5, 3211 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Willerslev, E. et al. Science 300, 791–795 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Willerslev, E. et al. Nature 506, 47–51 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Slon, V. et al. Science 356, 605–608 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Claw, K. G. et al. Nat. Commun. 9, 2957 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Garrison, N. A. et al. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 20, 495–517 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kowal, E. in Biomapping Indigenous Peoples: Towards an Understanding of the Issues (eds Berthier-Folgar, S. et al.) 329–347 (Rodopi, 2012).

  12. Adams, K., Faulkhead, S., Standfield, R. & Atkinson, P. Women Birth 31, 81–88 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), Australian Research Council (ARC) & Australian Vice-Chancellors’ Committee (AVCC) National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (2007) - Updated 2015 (National Health and Medical Research Council, 2015).

  14. Pawu-Kurlpurlunu, W. J., Holmes, M. & Box, L. A. Ngurra-kurlu: A Way of Working with Warlpiri People DKCRC Report 41 (Desert Knowledge CRC, 2008); https://go.nature.com/3jl4TR4

  15. Rose, D. B. Dingo Makes Us Human: Life and Land in an Australian Aboriginal Culture (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992).

  16. Stanner, W. E. H. in White Man Got No Dreaming: Essays 1938-1973 198–248 (Australian National Univ. Press, 1979).

  17. Lewis, C. M. Jr, Obregón-Tito, A., Tito, R. Y., Foster, M. W. & Spicer, P. G. Trends Microbiol. 20, 1–4 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ma, Y., Chen, H., Lan, C. & Ren, J. Protein Cell 9, 404–415 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kistler, L., Ware, R., Smith, O., Collins, M. & Allaby, R. G. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, 6310–6320 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Andersen, K. et al. Mol. Ecol. 21, 1966–1979 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Haile, J. et al. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 982–989 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We, especially L.R., acknowledge the many Aboriginal women they have discussed these matters with and from whom they have learned a great deal. Funding for this project was provided by the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Australian Biodiversity and Heritage (CE170100015). E.K. and L.S.W. are also supported by Australian Research Council Future Fellowships (FT160100093 and FT180100407, respectively). M.H.-D. is supported by a Westpac Future Leaders scholarship. We also thank the participants in the Penn State Bioethics Colloquium for their feedback on an earlier draft of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura S. Weyrich.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Handsley-Davis, M., Kowal, E., Russell, L. et al. Researchers using environmental DNA must engage ethically with Indigenous communities. Nat Ecol Evol 5, 146–148 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-01351-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-01351-6

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene