As a result of identity prejudice, certain individuals are more vulnerable to conflict and violence when they are in the field. It is paramount that all fieldworkers be informed of the risks some colleagues may face, so that they can define best practice together: here we recommend strategies to minimize risk for all individuals conducting fieldwork.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Beltran, R. S. et al. Ecol. Evol. 10, 5184–5196 (2020).
Gibbs Jr, K. Diversity in STEM: What it is and why it matters. Scientific American (10 September 2014).
Plaut, V. C. Psychol. Inq. 21, 77–99 (2010).
Nature 558, 5 (2018).
AlShebli, B. K., Rahwan, T. & Woon, W. L. Nat. Commun. 9, 5163 (2018).
Campbell, L. G., Mehtani, S., Dozier, M. E. & Rinehart, J. PLoS ONE 8, e79147 (2013).
Nielsen, M. W. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 1740–1742 (2017).
O’Brien, L. T., Bart, H. L. & Garcia, D. M. Soc. Psychol. Educ. 23, 449–477 (2020).
Clancy, K. B. H., Nelson, R. G., Rutherford, J. N. & Hinde, K. PLoS ONE 9, e102172 (2014).
McGuire, K. L., Primack, R. B. & Losos, E. C. BioScience 62, 189–196 (2012).
Nelson, R. G., Rutherford, J. N., Hinde, K. & Clancy, K. B. H. Am. Anthropol. 119, 710–722 (2017).
Pickrell, J. Scientists push against barriers to diversity in the field sciences. Science (11 March 2020).
Barker, M. J. Innov. Educ. Teach. Int. 48, 387–400 (2011).
Thomas, K. M., Willis, L. A. & Davis, J. Equal Opport. Int. 26, 178–192 (2007).
Mehta, D. Nature 559, 153–154 (2018).
Figueroa, J. L. & Rodriguez, G. M. N. Dir. High. Educ. 2015, 23–32 (2015).
Loewen, J. W. Sundown Towns: A Hidden Dimension of American Racism (The New Press, 2005).
The universality of this document was accomplished with the help of numerous professionals of varying backgrounds and perspectives. We thank the faculty, students and professionals who have provided deeply considered feedback. Specifically, we thank the following individuals: S. Aguillon, L. Arcila Hernandez, K. Barker, S. Barve, A. Belasen, C. S. Buckler, D. Chang van Oordt, C. Chappell, M. Chatterjee, N. Chen, K. Covino, A. Darby, K. Eisen, D. Esparza, A. Flecker, M. Geber, S. Hejmadi, N. Hofmeister, K. Holmes, M. Howard, S. Kariuki, E. Lombardi, I. Lovette, A. K. Logan, H. Malik, C. McDonald, C. Miller, C. Mittan, C. Moreau, T. Ngyuen, K. Poveda, V. Ruiz, C. Specht, Y. H. Suh, S. Taylor, J. Uehling, J. Vanden Heuvel, E. Williams, M. Vitousek and S. Xayarath Hernandez. We also thank the following organizations: American Ornithological Society Diversity and Inclusion Committee, Black AF in STEM, Cornell Agricultural and Life Science Diversity and Inclusion Committee, and Cornell University Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology.
The authors declare no competing interests.
About this article
Cite this article
Demery, AJ.C., Pipkin, M.A. Safe fieldwork strategies for at-risk individuals, their supervisors and institutions. Nat Ecol Evol 5, 5–9 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-01328-5
This article is cited by
Nature Ecology & Evolution (2021)
Nature Ecology & Evolution (2021)