Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Safe fieldwork strategies for at-risk individuals, their supervisors and institutions

As a result of identity prejudice, certain individuals are more vulnerable to conflict and violence when they are in the field. It is paramount that all fieldworkers be informed of the risks some colleagues may face, so that they can define best practice together: here we recommend strategies to minimize risk for all individuals conducting fieldwork.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Example situations experienced by at-risk individuals in the field.

References

  1. 1.

    Beltran, R. S. et al. Ecol. Evol. 10, 5184–5196 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Gibbs Jr, K. Diversity in STEM: What it is and why it matters. Scientific American (10 September 2014).

  3. 3.

    Plaut, V. C. Psychol. Inq. 21, 77–99 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Nature 558, 5 (2018).

  5. 5.

    AlShebli, B. K., Rahwan, T. & Woon, W. L. Nat. Commun. 9, 5163 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Campbell, L. G., Mehtani, S., Dozier, M. E. & Rinehart, J. PLoS ONE 8, e79147 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Nielsen, M. W. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 1740–1742 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    O’Brien, L. T., Bart, H. L. & Garcia, D. M. Soc. Psychol. Educ. 23, 449–477 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Clancy, K. B. H., Nelson, R. G., Rutherford, J. N. & Hinde, K. PLoS ONE 9, e102172 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    McGuire, K. L., Primack, R. B. & Losos, E. C. BioScience 62, 189–196 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Nelson, R. G., Rutherford, J. N., Hinde, K. & Clancy, K. B. H. Am. Anthropol. 119, 710–722 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Pickrell, J. Scientists push against barriers to diversity in the field sciences. Science (11 March 2020).

  13. 13.

    Barker, M. J. Innov. Educ. Teach. Int. 48, 387–400 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Thomas, K. M., Willis, L. A. & Davis, J. Equal Opport. Int. 26, 178–192 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Mehta, D. Nature 559, 153–154 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Figueroa, J. L. & Rodriguez, G. M. N. Dir. High. Educ. 2015, 23–32 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Loewen, J. W. Sundown Towns: A Hidden Dimension of American Racism (The New Press, 2005).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The universality of this document was accomplished with the help of numerous professionals of varying backgrounds and perspectives. We thank the faculty, students and professionals who have provided deeply considered feedback. Specifically, we thank the following individuals: S. Aguillon, L. Arcila Hernandez, K. Barker, S. Barve, A. Belasen, C. S. Buckler, D. Chang van Oordt, C. Chappell, M. Chatterjee, N. Chen, K. Covino, A. Darby, K. Eisen, D. Esparza, A. Flecker, M. Geber, S. Hejmadi, N. Hofmeister, K. Holmes, M. Howard, S. Kariuki, E. Lombardi, I. Lovette, A. K. Logan, H. Malik, C. McDonald, C. Miller, C. Mittan, C. Moreau, T. Ngyuen, K. Poveda, V. Ruiz, C. Specht, Y. H. Suh, S. Taylor, J. Uehling, J. Vanden Heuvel, E. Williams, M. Vitousek and S. Xayarath Hernandez. We also thank the following organizations: American Ornithological Society Diversity and Inclusion Committee, Black AF in STEM, Cornell Agricultural and Life Science Diversity and Inclusion Committee, and Cornell University Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Both co-first authors contributed equally to writing the document, contributing relevant resources (both written and peer feedback) from its initial draft to final submission.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Amelia-Juliette Claire Demery or Monique Avery Pipkin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Demery, AJ.C., Pipkin, M.A. Safe fieldwork strategies for at-risk individuals, their supervisors and institutions. Nat Ecol Evol 5, 5–9 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-01328-5

Download citation

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing