Many studies document negative inbreeding effects on individuals, and conservation efforts to preserve rare species routinely employ strategies to reduce inbreeding. Despite this, there are few clear examples in nature of inbreeding decreasing the growth rates of populations, and the extent of population-level effects of inbreeding in the wild remains controversial. Here, we take advantage of a long-term dataset of 26 reintroduced Alpine ibex (Capra ibex ibex) populations spanning nearly 100 years to show that inbreeding substantially reduced per capita population growth rates, particularly for populations in harsher environments. Populations with high average inbreeding (F ≈ 0.2) had population growth rates reduced by 71% compared with populations with no inbreeding. Our results show that inbreeding can have long-term demographic consequences even when environmental variation is large and deleterious alleles may have been purged during bottlenecks. Thus, efforts to guard against inbreeding effects in populations of endangered species have not been misplaced.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $8.25 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
The data that support the findings of this study have been deposited in Dryad Digital Repository52.
Hedrick, P. W. & Garcia-Dorado, A. Understanding inbreeding depression, purging, and genetic rescue. Trends Ecol. Evol. 31, 940–952 (2016).
Wallace, B. Hard and soft selection revisited. Evolution 29, 465–473 (1975).
Agrawal, A. F. & Whitlock, M. C. Mutation load: the fitness of individuals in populations where deleterious alleles are abundant. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 43, 115–135 (2012).
Johnson, H. E., Mills, L. S., Wehausen, J. D., Stephenson, T. R. & Luikart, G. Translating effects of inbreeding depression on component vital rates to overall population growth in endangered bighorn sheep. Conserv. Biol. 25, 1240–1249 (2011).
Reed, T. E., Grotan, V., Jenouvrier, S., Saether, B.-E. & Visser, M. E. Population growth in a wild bird is buffered against phenological mismatch. Science 340, 488–491 (2013).
Agrawal, A. F. & Whitlock, M. C. Environmental duress and epistasis: how does stress affect the strength of selection on new mutations? Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 450–458 (2010).
Creel, S. Recovery of the Florida panther—genetic rescue, demographic rescue, or both? Response to Pimm et al. (2006). Anim. Conserv. 9, 125–126 (2006).
Wootton, J. T. & Pfister, C. A. Processes affecting extinction risk in the laboratory and in nature. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E5903 (2015).
Hufbauer, R. A. et al. Reply to Wootton and Pfister: the search for general context should include synthesis with laboratory model systems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E5904– (2015).
Kardos, M., Taylor, H. R., Ellegren, H., Luikart, G. & Allendorf, F. W. Genomics advances the study of inbreeding depression in the wild. Evol. Appl. 9, 1205–1218 (2016).
Stuwe, M. & Nievergelt, B. Recovery of Alpine ibex from near extinction: the result of effective protection, captive breeding, and reintroductions. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 29, 379–387 (1991).
Grotan, V., Saether, B. E., Filli, F. & Engen, S. Effects of climate on population fluctuations of ibex. Glob. Change Biol. 14, 218–228 (2008).
Biebach, I. & Keller, L. F. A strong genetic footprint of the re-introduction history of Alpine ibex (Capra ibex ibex). Mol. Ecol. 18, 5046–5058 (2009).
Biebach, I. & Keller, L. F. Genetic variation depends more on admixture than number of founders in reintroduced Alpine ibex populations. Biol. Conserv. 147, 197–203 (2012).
Biebach, I. & Keller, L. F. D. Inbreeding in reintroduced populations: the effects of early reintroduction history and contemporary processes. Conserv. Genet. 11, 527–538 (2010).
Crow, J. F. in Statistics and Mathematics in Biology (eds Kempthome, O. et al.) 543–556 (Iowa State Univ. Press, 1954).
Jacquard, A. in The Genetic Structure of Populations (ed. Jacquard, A.) 160–219 (Springer, 1974).
Vitalis, R., Dawson, K. & Boursot, P. Interpretation of variation across marker loci as evidence of selection. Genetics 158, 1811–1823 (2001).
Weir, B. S. & Goudet, J. A unified characterization of population structure and relatedness. Genetics 206, 2085–2103 (2017).
Holsinger, K. E. & Weir, B. S. Genetics in geographically structured populations: defining, estimating and interpreting F ST. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 639–650 (2009).
Vitalis, R. & Couvet, D. Estimation of effective population size and migration rate from one- and two-locus identity measures. Genetics 157, 911–925 (2001).
Fuller, W. A. Measurement Error Models (John Wiley & Sons, 1987).
Muff, S., Riebler, A., Held, L., Rue, H. & Saner, P. Bayesian analysis of measurement error models using integrated nested Laplace approximations. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. C 64, 231–252 (2015).
Yun, L. & Agrawal, A. F. Variation in the strength of inbreeding depression across environments: effects of stress and density dependence. Evolution 68, 3599–3606 (2014).
Gilpin, M. E. & Soulé, M. E. in Conservation Biology, the Science of Scarcity and Diversity (ed. Soulé, M. E.) 19–34 (Sinauer Assiocates, 1986).
Wright, S. Size of population and breeding structure in relation to evolution. Science 87, 430–431 (1938).
Beaumont, M. A. Estimation of population growth or decline in genetically monitored populations. Genetics 164, 1139–1160 (2003).
Facon, B. et al. Inbreeding depression is purged in the invasive insect armonia axyridis. Curr. Biol. 21, 424–427 (2011).
Garcia-Dorado, A. Understanding and predicting the fitness decline of shrunk populations: inbreeding, purging, mutation, and standard selection. Genetics 190, 1461–1476 (2012).
Glemin, S. How are deleterious mutations purged? Drift versus nonrandom mating. Evolution 57, 2678–2687 (2003).
Kirkpatrick, M. & Jarne, P. The effects of a bottleneck on inbreeding depression and the genetic load. Am. Nat. 155, 154–167 (2000).
Whiteley, A. R., Fitzpatrick, S. W., Funk, W. C. & Tallmon, D. A. Genetic rescue to the rescue. Trends Ecol. Evol. 30, 42–49 (2015).
Saccheri, I. et al. Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation. Nature 392, 491–494 (1998).
O’Grady, J. J. et al. Realistic levels of inbreeding depression strongly affect extinction risk in wild populations. Biol. Conserv. 133, 42–51 (2006).
Goldberg, E. E. et al. Species selection maintains self-incompatibility. Science 330, 493–495 (2010).
Nievergelt, B. Der Alpensteinbock (Capra Ibex L.) in Seinem Lebensraum (Verlag Paul Parey, 1966).
Abderhalden, W. D. Raumnutzung und Sexuelle Segregation (Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg i. Brsg., 2004).
Saether, B. E., Lillegard, M., Grotan, V., Filli, F. & Engen, S. Predicting fluctuations of reintroduced ibex populations: the importance of density dependence, environmental stochasticity and uncertain population estimates. J. Anim. Ecol. 76, 326–336 (2007).
Jaquiery, J., Guillaume, F. & Perrin, N. Predicting the deleterious effects of mutation load in fragmented populations. Conserv. Biol. 23, 207–218 (2009).
Ciofi, C., Beaumont, M. A., Swingland, I. R. & Bruford, M. W. Genetic divergence and units for conservation in the Komodo dragon Varanus komodoensis. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266, 2269–2274 (1999).
R Development Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2016); http://www.R-project.org
Grossen, C., Biebach, I., Angelone-Alasaad, S., Keller, L. F. & Croll, D. Population genomics analyses of European ibex species show lower diversity and higher inbreeding in reintroduced populations. Evol. Appl. 11, 123–139 (2018).
Aeschbacher, A. Das Brunftverhalten des Alpensteinwildes (Rentsch, 1978).
Harvey, A. C. Forecasting, Structural Time Series Models and the Kalman Filter (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1989).
Schooler, S. S., Salau, B., Julien, M. H. & Ives, A. R. Alternative stable states explain unpredictable biological control of Salvinia molesta in Kakadu. Nature 470, 86–89 (2011).
Dennis, B., Ponciano, J. M., Lele, S. R., Taper, M. L. & Staples, D. F. Estimating density dependence, process noise, and observation error. Ecol. Monogr. 76, 323–341 (2006).
MathWorks MATLAB (The MathWorks, 2012).
Kendall, M. & Stuart, A. The Advanced Theory of Statistics Vol. 2 (Griffin, 1979).
Carroll, R., Ruppert, D., Stefanski, L. & Crainiceanu, C. Measurement Error in Nonlinear Models: A Modern Perspective (Chapman & Hall, 2006).
Rue, H., Martino, S. & Chopin, N. Approximate Bayesian inference for latent Gaussian models by using integrated nested Laplace approximations. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 71, 319–392 (2009).
Spiegelhalter, D. J., Best, N. G., Carlin, B. R. & van der Linde, A. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 64, 583–616 (2002).
Bozzuto, C., Biebach, I., Muff, S., Ives, A. R. & Keller, L. F. Inbreeding reduces long-term growth of Alpine ibex populations. Dryad Digital Repository https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.dc1s8h3 (2019).
We thank the many people who helped us obtain genetic samples from Alpine ibex, especially the cantonal authorities and game wardens. We also thank the Swiss Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN) for the count and harvest data, and Wildtier Schweiz for access to their archives of ibex reintroduction history. We are grateful to S. Aeschbacher and B. Oberholzer for gathering information from these archives, and to T. Bucher and G. Camenisch for help in the laboratory. M. Beaumont provided important insights, and comments by J. Bascompte, E. Albert, H. Kokko, I. Saccheri and K. Strier improved the manuscript. The FOEN financially supported this project.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Bozzuto, C., Biebach, I., Muff, S. et al. Inbreeding reduces long-term growth of Alpine ibex populations. Nat Ecol Evol 3, 1359–1364 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0968-1
Multiple life-stage inbreeding depression impacts demography and extinction risk in an extinct-in-the-wild species
Scientific Reports (2021)
Mammal Review (2020)
Fragmentation and Translocation Distort the Genetic Landscape of Ungulates: Red Deer in the Netherlands
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution (2020)
Nature Communications (2020)
Landscape resistance affects individual habitat selection but not genetic relatedness in a reintroduced desert ungulate
Biological Conservation (2020)