Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

CORAL REEFS

Big data guides pragmatic management

An assessment of coral communities on more than 2,500 reefs across the Indo-Pacific identifies three categories of reef according to their functionality and vulnerability to ocean warming. This categorization reveals a sobering picture of today’s coral reefs, but also provides a foundation for their future management.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Reef categories.

References

  1. Hughes, T. P. et al. Nature 543, 373–377 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Spalding, M. et al. Mar. Policy 82, 104–113 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Darling, E. et al. Nat. Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0953-8 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Glynn, P. W. & Manzello, D. P. in Coral Reefs in the Anthropocene (ed. Birkeland, C.) 67–97 (Springer, 2015).

  5. Veron, J. E. N. Corals of the World (Australian Institute of Marine Science, 2000).

  6. Perry, C. T. et al. Nat. Commun. 4, 1402 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Madin, J. S. et al. Trends Ecol. Evol. 31, 419–428 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Alvarez-Filip, L., Carricart-Ganivet, J. P., Horta-Puga, G. & Iglesias-Prieto, R. Sci. Rep. 3, 3486 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Strain, E. M. et al. Divers. Distrib. 25, 9–20 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bruno, J. F., Côté, I. M. & Toth, L. T. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 11, 307–334 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Beyer, H. L. et al. Conserv. Lett. 11, e12587 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Van Hooidonk, R. et al. Sci. Rep. 6, 39666 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Hein, M. Y. et al. Biol. Conserv. 229, 14–25 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bellwood, D. R., Streit, R. P., Brandl, S. J. & Tebbett, S. B. Funct. Ecol. 33, 948–961 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brandl, S. J. et al. Front. Ecol. Environ. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2088 (in the press).

  16. Bellwood, D. R. et al. Biol. Conserv. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.05.056 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon J. Brandl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brandl, S.J. Big data guides pragmatic management. Nat Ecol Evol 3, 1283–1284 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0957-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0957-4

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene