Brief Communication | Published:

Conserved alarm calls but rapid auditory learning in monkey responses to novel flying objects

Abstract

To evaluate the flexibility in vocal production and comprehension in a non-human primate, we presented a drone to West African green monkeys, Chlorocebus sabaeus. Calls given in response to the drone were clearly distinct from those given to other predators, but highly similar to the aerial alarm calls of the East African vervet monkey, Chlorocebus pygerythrus, suggesting that call structure is conserved. To probe how rapidly the animals attached meaning to the sound of the drone, we played back the drone sound after one to three exposures. Subjects immediately scanned the sky and ran for cover. In contrast to vocal production, comprehension learning was rapid and open-ended.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Data availability

Data are available at https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/F4UTP.

Code availability

Code is available at https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/F4UTP.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Fischer, J. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 24, 72–78 (2017).

  2. 2.

    Fitch, W. T. The Evolution of Language (Cambridge University Press, 2010).

  3. 3.

    Zuberbühler, K. Adv. Study Behav. 33, 265–307 (2003).

  4. 4.

    Townsend, S. W. & Manser, M. B. Ethology 119, 1–11 (2013).

  5. 5.

    Manser, M. B. Proc. R. Soc. B 268, 2315–2324 (2001).

  6. 6.

    Gill, S. A. & Bierema, A. M.-K. Ethology 119, 449–461 (2013).

  7. 7.

    Arnold, K. & Zuberbühler, K. Curr. Biol. 18, 202–203 (2008).

  8. 8.

    Schamberg, I., Cheney, D. L., Clay, Z., Hohmann, G. & Seyfarth, R. M. Anim. Behav. 122, 109–116 (2016).

  9. 9.

    Coye, C., Ouattara, K., Arlet, M. E., Lemasson, A. & Zuberbühler, K. Anim. Behav. 141, 171–181 (2018).

  10. 10.

    ten Cate, C. Psychon. Bull. Rev. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1091-9 (2016).

  11. 11.

    Seyfarth, R. M., Cheney, D. L. & Marler, P. Anim. Behav. 28, 1070–1094 (1980).

  12. 12.

    Seyfarth, R. M., Cheney, D. L. & Marler, P. Science 210, 801–803 (1980).

  13. 13.

    Struhsaker, T. T. in Social Communication among Primates (ed. Altmann, S.) 281–324 (University of Chicago Press, 1967).

  14. 14.

    Price, T. et al. Sci. Rep. 5, 13220 (2015).

  15. 15.

    Price, T. & Fischer, J. Anim. Cogn. 17, 277–286 (2014).

  16. 16.

    Arnold, K., Pohlner, Y. & Zuberbühler, K. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62, 549–559 (2008).

  17. 17.

    Mundry, R. & Sommer, C. Anim. Behav. 74, 965–976 (2007).

  18. 18.

    Seyfarth, R. M. & Cheney, D. L. Anim. Behav. 34, 1640–1658 (1986).

  19. 19.

    Price, T., Ndiaye, O. & Fischer, J. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 68, 815–825 (2014).

  20. 20.

    Hammerschmidt, K., Freudenstein, T. & Jürgens, U. Behaviour 138, 1179–1204 (2001).

  21. 21.

    Winter, P. P., Handley, D. & Schott, D. Behaviour 47, 230–239 (1973).

  22. 22.

    Owren, M. J., Dieter, J. A., Seyfarth, R. M. & Cheney, D. L. Dev. Psychobiol. 26, 389–406 (1993).

  23. 23.

    Gultekin, Y. B. & Hage, S. R. Nat. Commun. 8, 14046 (2017).

  24. 24.

    Takahashi, D. Y., Liao, D. A. & Ghazanfar, A. A. Curr. Biol. 27, 1844–1852.e6 (2017).

  25. 25.

    Watson, S. K. et al. Curr. Biol. 25, 495–499 (2015).

  26. 26.

    Fischer, J., Wheeler, B. C. & Higham, J. P. Curr. Biol. 25, R1028–R1029 (2015).

  27. 27.

    Seyfarth, R. M. & Cheney, D. L. in Social influences on Vocal Development (eds Snowdon, C. T. & Hausberger, M.) 249–273 (Cambridge University Press, 1997).

  28. 28.

    Fischer, J., Cheney, D. L. & Seyfarth, R. M. Proc. R. Soc. B 267, 2317–2321 (2000).

  29. 29.

    Fischer, J. & Price, T. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 82, 22–31 (2017).

  30. 30.

    Hauser, M. D. Behaviour 105, 187–201 (1988).

  31. 31.

    Zuberbühler, K. Proc. R. Soc. B 267, 713–718 (2000).

  32. 32.

    Scott, B. H. & Mishkin, M. Brain Res. 1640, 264–277 (2016).

  33. 33.

    Fischer, J., Wegdell, F. L. & Hammerschmidt, K. Conserved alarm calls but rapid auditory learning in monkey responses to novel flying objects – Data Set https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/F4UTP (2019).

  34. 34.

    Schrader, L. & Hammerschmidt, K. Bioacoustics 7, 247–265 (1997).

  35. 35.

    Fischer, J., Noser, R. & Hammerschmidt, K. Am. J. Primatol. 75, 643–663 (2013).

  36. 36.

    R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2017).

  37. 37.

    Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J. & Bates, D. M. J. Mem. Lang. 59, 390–412 (2008).

  38. 38.

    Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C. & Tily, H. J. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: keep it maximal. J. Mem. Lang. 68, 255–278 (2013).

  39. 39.

    Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D. & Simonsohn, U. Psychol. Sci. 22, 1359–1366 (2011).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank R. Seyfarth, D. Cheney and T. Struhsaker for sharing their recordings and insights into vervet monkey communication. Approval and research permission were granted by the Direction des Parcs Nationaux and the Ministère de l’Environnement et de la Protection de la Nature de la République du Sénégal (research permit Nos. 0373/10/3/2012 and 1480/11/11/2016). Research was conducted within the regulations set by Senegalese agencies. We thank Equipe Simenti for assistance with the data collection and L. Ehrenreich for logistic support and help with compilation of Fig. 1. Funding from the Leibniz ScienceCampus Primate Cognition is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

F.W., K.H. and J.F. conceived the study. F.W. conducted the experiment. F.W., K.H. and J.F. conducted the acoustic and statistical analyses. J.F. wrote the paper with input from all authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Correspondence to Julia Fischer.

Supplementary information

  1. Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Figs. 1–4 and Supplementary Tables 1–6

  2. Reporting Summary

  3. Supplementary Video

    Response of green monkey female to the playback of the drone sound

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark
Fig. 1: Structure and discriminability of green and vervet monkey alarm calls.
Fig. 2: Response to drone and control playbacks.