Article | Published:

Human genealogy reveals a selective advantage to moderate fecundity

Nature Ecology & Evolutionvolume 3pages853857 (2019) | Download Citation

Abstract

Life-history theory suggests that the level of fecundity of each organism reflects the effect of the trade-off between the quantity and quality of offspring on its long-run reproductive success. The present research provides evidence that moderate fecundity was conducive to long-run reproductive success in humans. Using a reconstructed genealogy for nearly half a million individuals in Quebec during the 1608–1800 period, the study establishes that, while high fecundity was associated with a larger number of children, perhaps paradoxically, moderate fecundity maximized the number of descendants after several generations. Moreover, the analysis further suggests that evolutionary forces decreased the level of fecundity in the population over this period, consistent with an additional finding that the level of fecundity that maximized long-run reproductive success was above the population mean. The research identifies several mechanisms that contributed to the importance of moderate fecundity for long-run reproductive success. It suggests that, while individuals with lower fecundity had fewer children, the observed hump-shaped effect of fecundity on long-run reproductive success reflects the beneficial effects of lower fecundity on various measures of child quality, such as marriageability and literacy, and thus on the reproductive success of each child.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from PRDH at the University of Montreal. Restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license. They are available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of PRDH.

Code availability

The statistical code is available from the authors upon request.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Oded Galor, Marc Klemp.

Change history

  • 10 April 2019

    The original Nature Research Reporting Summary provided with this manuscript was incorrect. The correct version is now available online.

References

  1. 1.

    Lack, D. et al. The Natural Regulation of Animal Numbers (Clarenden Press, 1954).

  2. 2.

    Cody, M. L. A general theory of clutch size. Evolution 20, 174–184 (1966).

  3. 3.

    Roff, D. A. Evolution of Life Histories: Theory and Analysis (Chapman & Hall, 1992).

  4. 4.

    Stearns, S. C. The Evolution of Life Histories (Oxford Univ. Press, 1992).

  5. 5.

    Salisbury, E. J. et al. The Reproductive Capacity of Plants. Studies in Quantitative Biology (G. Bell & Sons, Ltd. 1942).

  6. 6.

    Harper, J. L., Lovell, P. H. & Moore, K. G. The shapes and sizes of seeds. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1, 327–356 (1970).

  7. 7.

    Roff, D. A. Life History Evolution (Sinauer Associates, 2002).

  8. 8.

    Charnov, E. L. & Ernest, S. K. M. The offspring-size/clutch-size trade-off in mammals. Am. Nat. 167, 578–582 (2006).

  9. 9.

    Walker, R. M., Gurven, M., Burger, O. & Hamilton, M. J. The trade-off between number and size of offspring in humans and other primates. Proc. R. Soc. B 275, 827–833 (2008).

  10. 10.

    Lee, R. D. in Handbook of Population and Family Economics Vol. 1 (eds Rosenzweig, M. R. & Stark, O.) 1063–1115 (Elsevier, 1993).

  11. 11.

    Hill, K. & Hurtado, A. M. Ache Life History: The Ecology and Demography of a Foraging People (Aldine de Gruyter, 1996).

  12. 12.

    Strassmann, B. I. & Gillespie, B. Life-history theory, fertility and reproductive success in humans. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269, 553–562 (2002).

  13. 13.

    Gillespie, D. O. S., Russell, A. F. & Lummaa, V. When fecundity does not equal fitness: evidence of an offspring quantity versus quality trade-off in pre-industrial humans. Proc. R. Soc. B 275, 713–722 (2008).

  14. 14.

    Meij, J. J. et al. Quality–quantity trade-off of human offspring under adverse environmental conditions. J. Evol. Biol. 22, 1014–1023 (2009).

  15. 15.

    Kaplan, H. S., Lancaster, J. B., Johnson, S. E. & Bock, J. A. Does observed fertility maximize fitness among New Mexican men? Hum. Nat. 6, 325–360 (1995).

  16. 16.

    Borgerhoff Mulder, M. Optimizing offspring: the quantity–quality tradeoff in agropastoral Kipsigis. Evol. Hum. Behav. 21, 391–410 (2000).

  17. 17.

    Lawson, D. W. & Mulder, M. B. The offspring quantity–quality trade-off and human fertility variation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 371, 20150145 (2016).

  18. 18.

    Christensen, K. et al. The correlation of fecundability among twins: evidence of a genetic effect on fertility? Epidemiology 14, 60–64 (2003).

  19. 19.

    Pettay, J. E., Kruuk, L. E. B., Jokela, J. & Lummaa, V. Heritability and genetic constraints of life-history trait evolution in preindustrial humans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 2838–2843 (2005).

  20. 20.

    Ramlau-Hansen, C. H., Thulstrup, A. M., Olsen, J. & Bonde, J. P. Parental subfecundity and risk of decreased semen quality in the male offspring: a follow-up study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 167, 1458–1464 (2008).

  21. 21.

    Kosova, G., Abney, M. & Ober, C. Heritability of reproductive fitness traits in a human population. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 1772–1778 (2009).

  22. 22.

    Lind, J. T. & Mehlum, H. With or without U? The appropriate test for a U-shaped relationship. Oxf. Bull. Econ. Stat. 72, 109–118 (2010).

  23. 23.

    Price, G. R. Selection and covariance. Nature 227, 520–521 (1970).

  24. 24.

    Frank, S. A. Natural selection. IV. The price equation. J. Evol. Biol. 2, 1002–1019 (2012).

  25. 25.

    Klemp, M. & Weisdorf, J. Fecundity, fertility and the formation of human capital. Econ. J. 129, 925–960 (2018).

  26. 26.

    Galor, O. & Moav, O. Natural selection and the origin of economic growth. Q. J. Econ. 117, 1133–1191 (2002).

  27. 27.

    Galor, O. Unified Growth Theory (Princeton Univ. Press, 2011).

  28. 28.

    Légaré, J. A population register for Canada under the French regime: context, scope, content and applications. Can. Stud. Popul. 15, 1–16 (1988).

  29. 29.

    Lacroix, C. & Desjardins, B. Adult mortality in preindustrial Quebec. Can. Stud. Popul. 39, 23–33 (2012).

  30. 30.

    Milot, E. et al. Evidence for evolution in response to natural selection in a contemporary human population. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 17040–17045 (2011).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The data were collected and kindly provided by ‘Le Programme de Recherche en Démographie Historique’ (PRDH) at the University of Montreal. The authors are grateful to B. Desjardins for sharing the data and providing helpful information. Part of this research was conducted while M.K. was a visiting assistant professor at Brown University and a visiting scholar at Harvard University, and funded by the Carlsberg Foundation, the Danish Research Council (reference numbers 1329–00093 and 1327–00245) and the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement number 753615).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Brown University, Providence, RI, USA

    • Oded Galor
  2. University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    • Marc Klemp

Authors

  1. Search for Oded Galor in:

  2. Search for Marc Klemp in:

Contributions

O.G. and M.K. conceived the research idea, formulated the theory, analysed the data and wrote the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Oded Galor or Marc Klemp.

Supplementary information

  1. Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Sections 1–13 and Supplementary Bibliography

  2. Reporting Summary

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

Issue Date

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0846-x