Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Viewing the Ediacaran biota as a failed experiment is unhelpful

Macroscopic organisms from the late Ediacaran period have often been described as failed experiments in the history of life. We argue that the field of Ediacaran palaeobiology should dispense with unhelpful historical classification schemes and embrace phylogenetic systematics if we are to establish the evolutionary relevance of these fossils.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Members of the Ediacaran macrobiota and Cambrian ‘weird wonders’.

D. Grazhdankin (a), M. Laflamme (d) and J. Vinther (e).

Fig. 2: How phylogenetic thinking affects our view of the Ediacaran macrobiota.

References

  1. Shen, B., Dong, L., Xiao, S. & Kowalewski, M. Science 319, 81–84 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ford, T. D. Proc. Yorkshire Geol. Soc. 31, 211–217 (1958).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Glaessner, M. F. & Wade, M. Palaeontology 9, 599–628 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wade, M. F. Mem. Queensland Mus. 16, 171–190 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pflug, H. D. Paläontol. Z. 46, 56–67 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pflug, H. D. Palaeontogr. A 139, 166–202 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hoyal Cuthill, J. F. & Han, J. Palaeontology 61, 813–823 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fedonkin, M. A. Phil. Trans. R Soc. Lond. B 311, 27–45 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fedonkin, M. A. Itogi Nauk. Tekh. Ser. Stratigr. Paleontol. 12, 1–127 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Edgecombe, G. D. Evol. Educ. Outreach 2, 178–190 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Seilacher, A. Lethaia 22, 229–239 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Seilacher, A. J. Geol. Soc. 149, 607–613 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Buss, L. W. & Seilacher, A. Paleobiology 20, 1–4 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Seilacher, A., Grazhdankin, D. & Legouta, A. Paleontol. Res. 7, 43–54 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Seilacher, A. Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. 286, 387–397 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Runnegar, B. N. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Abh. 195, 303–318 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Xiao, S. & Laflamme, M. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 31–40 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Erwin, D. H. et al. Science 334, 1091–1097 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ivantsov, A.Y. & Malakhovskaya, Y. E. Dokl. Earth Sci. 385A, 618–622 (2002).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gold, D. A., Runnegar, B., Gehling, J. G. & Jacobs, D. K. Evol. Dev. 17, 315–324 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hoekzema, R. S., Brasier, M. D., Dunn, F. S. & Liu, A. G. Proc. R. Soc. B 284, 20171348 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bobrovskiy, I. et al. Science 361, 1246–1249 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kolesnikov, A. V. et al. Precambrian Res. 316, 24–37 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bobrovskiy, I., Hope, J. M., Krasnova, A., Ivantsov, A. & Brocks, J. J. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 437–440 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bamforth, E. L. & Narbonne, G. M. J. Paleontol. 83, 897–913 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gould, S. J. Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History (WW Norton, New York, London, 1989).

  27. Brysse, K. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. C 39, 298–313 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chipman, A. D. Bioessays 32, 60–70 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Grazhdankin, D. J. Paleontol. 88, 269–283 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tarhan, L. G., Droser, M. L., Cole, D. B. & Gehling, J. G. Integr. Comp. Biol. 58, 688–702 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mitchell, E. G. & Butterfield, N. J. Paleobiology 44, 40–57 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Darroch, S. A., Laflamme, M. & Wagner, P. J. High ecological complexity in benthic Ediacaran communities. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1541–1547 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ivantsov, A. Y. Paleontol. J. 41, 113–122 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Williams, T. A., Foster, P. G., Cox, C. J. & Embley, T. M. Nature 504, 231–236 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Baldauf, S. L. & Palmer, J. D. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 11558–11562 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank D. Grazhdankin and P. Donoghue for constructive discussion.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frances S. Dunn.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dunn, F.S., Liu, A.G. Viewing the Ediacaran biota as a failed experiment is unhelpful. Nat Ecol Evol 3, 512–514 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0815-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0815-4

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing