Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Reply to ‘Consider species specialism when publishing datasets’ and ‘Decision trees for data publishing may exacerbate conservation conflict’

Your institute does not have access to this article

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. Tulloch, A. I. T. et al. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1209–1217 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lunghi, E. et al. Nat. Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0803-8 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Minderman, J. et al. Nat. Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0804-7 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lowe, A. J. et al. Science 357, 141 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lindenmayer, D. & Scheele, B. Science 356, 800–801 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. McDonald-Madden, E. et al. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 547–550 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Strindberg, S. & O'Brien, T. A Decision Tree for Monitoring Wildlife to Assess the Effectiveness of Conservation Interventions. Working Paper No. 41. (Wildlife Conservation Society, New York, 2012).

  8. Oliver, T. H., Smithers, R. J., Bailey, S., Walmsley, C. A. & Watts, K. J. Appl. Ecol. 49, 1247–1255 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoegh-Guldberg, O. et al. Science 321, 345–346 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Redpath, S. M. et al. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28, 100–109 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tulloch, A. I. T., Nicol, S. & Bunnefeld, N. Biol. Conserv. 214, 147–155 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chapman, A. D. & Grafton, O. Guide to Best Practices for Generalising Sensitive Species Occurrence Data. (Report for the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, Copenhagen, 2008).

  13. Balmford, A., Crane, P., Dobson, A., Green, R. E. & Mace, G. M. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 360, 221–228 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Parmesan, C. & Yohe, G. Nature 421, 37–42 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ceballos, G. & Ehrlich, P. R. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 3841–3846 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayesha I. T. Tulloch.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tulloch, A.I.T., Auerbach, N., Avery-Gomm, S. et al. Reply to ‘Consider species specialism when publishing datasets’ and ‘Decision trees for data publishing may exacerbate conservation conflict’. Nat Ecol Evol 3, 320–321 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0805-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0805-6

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing