Comment | Published:

Towards a greener Common Agricultural Policy

Nature Ecology & Evolutionvolume 2pages18301833 (2018) | Download Citation

Ensuring an environmentally friendly overhaul of the European Union’s Common Agricultural Policy will entail payments for environmental objectives, promoting High Nature Value Farmlands, improved flexibility and policy integration.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Directorate-General for Internal Policies, Policy Department B European Council Conclusions on the Multiannual Financial Framework 2014-2020 and the CAP (European Parliament, Brussels, 2013).

  2. 2.

    Otte, A., Simmering, D. & Wolters, V. Landscape Ecol. 22, 639–642 (2007).

  3. 3.

    The CAP Towards 2020: Meeting the Food, Natural Resources and Territorial Challenges of the Future (European Commission, Brussels, 2010).

  4. 4.

    Eurostat (European Commission, Brussels, 2017); http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat

  5. 5.

    Thompson, K. J. EuroChoices 13, 20–25 (2014).

  6. 6.

    Emmerson, M. et al. Adv. Ecol. Res. 55, 43–97 (2016).

  7. 7.

    Pe’er, G. et al. Is the CAP Fit for Purpose? An Evidence-Based Fitness Check Assessment (German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research, Leipzig, 2017).

  8. 8.

    Foley, J. A. et al. Nature 478, 337–342 (2011).

  9. 9.

    Butler, S. J. et al. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 137, 348–357 (2010).

  10. 10.

    Agri-Food Trade in 2017: Another Record Year for EU Agri-Food Trade (European Commission, Brussels, 2018); https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/food-farming-fisheries/news/documents/agricultural-trade-report_map2018-1_en.pdf

  11. 11.

    Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development Modernising and Simplifying the Common Agricultural Policy (European Commission, Brussels, 2017); https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/consultations/cap-modernising/summary-public-consul.pdf

  12. 12.

    TNS Opinion & Social Attitudes of European Citizens Towards the Environment: Special Eurobarometer 416 (European Commission, Brussels, 2014).

  13. 13.

    Regulation (EU) 2017/2393 of the European Parliament and the Council of 13 December Amending Regulations (EU) No 1305/2013 on Support for Rural Development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), (EU) No 1306/2013 on the Financing, Management and Monitoring of the Common Agricultural Policy, (EU) No 1307/2013 Establishing Rules for Direct Payments to Farmers Under Support Schemes Within the Framework of the Common Agricultural Policy, (EU) No 1308/2013 Establishing a Common Organisation of the Markets in Agricultural Products and (EU) No 652/2014 Laying Down Provisions for the Management of Expenditure Relating to the Food Chain, Animal Health and Animal Welfare, and Relating to Plant Health and Plant Reproductive Material (European Commission, Brussels, 2017).

  14. 14.

    Pe’er, G. et al. Science 344, 1090–1092 (2014).

  15. 15.

    Mattews, A. Commission Assaults Rural Development Spending to Protect Direct Payments (capreform.eu, 2018); http://capreform.eu/commission-assaults-rural-development-spending-to-protect-direct-payments/

  16. 16.

    Batáry, P. et al. Conserv. Biol. 29, 1006–1016 (2015).

  17. 17.

    Lankoski, J. Alternative Payments Approaches for Biodiversity Conservation in Agriculture (OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers, Paris, 2016).

  18. 18.

    The Uruguay Agreement on Agriculture (World Trade Organization, Geneva, 1995); https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/14-ag.pdf

  19. 19.

    Greening: A More Complex Income Support Scheme, Not Yet Environmentally Effective (European Court of Auditors, Luxemburg, 2017).

  20. 20.

    Is Agri-Environment Support Well Designed and Managed? (European Court of Auditors, Luxemburg, 2011).

  21. 21.

    EU Biodiversity Baseline — Adapted to the MAES Typology Technical Report No. 9/2015 (European Environmental Agency, Luxembourg, 2015).

  22. 22.

    Halada, L., Evans, D., Romão, C. & Petersen, J. Biodivers. Conserv. 20, 2365–2378 (2011).

  23. 23.

    Keenleyside, C., Beaufoy, G. Tucker, G. & Jones, G. The High Nature Value Farming Throughout EU-27 and its Financial Support Under the CAP (Institute for European Environmental Policy, London, 2014).

  24. 24.

    Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on Support for Rural Development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and Repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 (European Commission, Brussels, 2013).

  25. 25.

    Strohbach, M. W., Kohler, M. L., Dauber, J. & Klimek, S. Ecol. Indic. 57, 557–563 (2015).

  26. 26.

    Lomba, A. et al. J. Environ. Manage. 143, 140–150 (2014).

  27. 27.

    Lomba, A. et al. Ecol. Indic. 72, 118–130 (2017).

  28. 28.

    Lomba, A., Alves, P., Jongman, R. H. G. & McCracken, D. I. Ecol. Evol. 5, 1031–1044 (2015).

  29. 29.

    Westhoek, H. J., Overmars, K. P. & Zeijts, H. Environ. Sci. Policy 32, 5–13 (2013).

  30. 30.

    Schermer, M. et al. Land Use Policy 52, 382–391 (2016).

  31. 31.

    Sokos, C. K., Mamolos, A. P., Kalburtji, K. L. & Birtsas, P. K. J. Nat. Conserv. 21, 81–92 (2013).

  32. 32.

    Babai, D. et al. Biodivers. Conserv. 24, 3305–3327 (2015).

  33. 33.

    Sutcliffe, L. M. E. et al. Divers. Distrib. 21, 722–730 (2015).

  34. 34.

    Reif, J. & Hanzelka, J. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 232, 208–217 (2016).

  35. 35.

    de Sainte Marie, C. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 57, 704–719 (2014).

  36. 36.

    Alons, G. J. Eur. Public Policy 24, 1604–1622 (2017).

  37. 37.

    López-Bao, J. V., Sazatornil, V., Llaneza, L. & Rodríguez, A. Conserv. Lett. 6, 448–455 (2013).

  38. 38.

    Salmoral, G. & Garrido, A. BAE 4, 103–123 (2015).

  39. 39.

    Pavlis, E. S., Terkenli, T. S., Kristensen, S. B. P., Busck, A. G. & Cosor, G. L. Land Use Policy 57, 800–812 (2016).

  40. 40.

    Lastra-Bravo, X. B., Hubbard, C., Garrod, G. & Tolón-Becerra, A. Environ. Sci. Policy 54, 1–9 (2015).

  41. 41.

    Sutherland, L. et al. J. Environ. Manage. 118, 96–105 (2013).

  42. 42.

    Pelikan, J., Britz, W. & Hertel, T. W. J. Agr. Econ. 66, 1–19 (2015).

Download references

Acknowledgements

J.V.L.-B. was supported by a Ramon & Cajal research contract (RYC-2015-18932) from the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness.

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Alberto Navarro, José Vicente López-Bao.

Affiliations

  1. Research Unit of Biodiversity (UO/CSIC/PA), Oviedo University, Mieres, Spain

    • Alberto Navarro
    •  & José Vicente López-Bao

Authors

  1. Search for Alberto Navarro in:

  2. Search for José Vicente López-Bao in:

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Vicente López-Bao.

Supplementary Information

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0724-y

Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing