Brief Communication | Published:

Wind farms have cascading impacts on ecosystems across trophic levels

Nature Ecology & Evolution (2018) | Download Citation

Abstract

Wind farms are a cleaner alternative to fossil fuels for mitigating the effects of climate change, but they also have complex ecological consequences. In the biodiversity hotspot of the Western Ghats in India, we find that wind farms reduce the abundance and activity of predatory birds (for example, Buteo, Butastur and Elanus species), which consequently increases the density of lizards, Sarada superba. The cascading effects of wind turbines on lizards include changes in behaviour, physiology and morphology that reflect a combination of predator release and density-dependent competition. By adding an effective trophic level to the top of food webs, we find that wind farms have emerging impacts that are greatly underestimated. There is thus a strong need for an ecosystem-wide view when aligning green-energy goals with environment protection.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Global Wind Report (Global Wind Energy Council, 2017).

  2. 2.

    Adoption of the Paris Agreement (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 2015).

  3. 3.

    Denholm, P., Hand, M., Jackson, M. & Ong, S. Land Use Requirements of Modern Wind Power Plants in the United States Technical Report (National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, 2009).

  4. 4.

    Schuster, E., Bulling, L. & Köppel, J. Environ. Manage. 56, 300–331 (2015).

  5. 5.

    Barrios, L. & Rodríguez, A. J. Appl. Ecol. 41, 72–81 (2004).

  6. 6.

    Korner-Nievergelt, F., Brinkmann, R., Niermann, I. & Behr, O. PLoS ONE 8, e67997 (2013).

  7. 7.

    Desholm, M. & Kahlert, J. Biol. Lett. 1, 296–298 (2005).

  8. 8.

    Cryan, P. M. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 15126–15131 (2014).

  9. 9.

    Łopucki, R. & Mróz, I. Environ. Monit. Assess. 188, 122 (2016).

  10. 10.

    Stewart, G. B., Pullin, A. S. & Coles, C. F. Environ. Conserv. 34, 1–11 (2007).

  11. 11.

    Estes, J. A. et al. Science 333, 301–306 (2011).

  12. 12.

    Paine, R. T. Am. Nat. 103, 91–93 (1969).

  13. 13.

    Sih, A., Crowley, P., McPeek, M., Petranka, J. & Strohmeier, K. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16, 269–311 (1985).

  14. 14.

    Lima, S. L. Bioscience 48, 25–34 (1998).

  15. 15.

    Clinchy, M., Sheriff, M. J. & Zanette, L. Y. Funct. Ecol. 27, 56–65 (2013).

  16. 16.

    Peckarsky, B. L. et al. Ecology 89, 2416–2425 (2008).

  17. 17.

    Werner, E. E. & Peacor, S. D. Ecology 84, 1083–1100 (2003).

  18. 18.

    Sheriff, M. J. & Thaler, J. S. Oecologia 176, 607–611 (2014).

  19. 19.

    Watve, A. J. Threat. Taxa 5, 3935–3962 (2013).

  20. 20.

    Karandikar, M., Ghate, K. & Kulkarni, K. J. Ecol. Soc. 28, 45–62 (2015).

  21. 21.

    Blois, J. L., Williams, J. W., Fitzpatrick, M. C., Jackson, S. T. & Ferrier, S. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 9374–9379 (2013).

  22. 22.

    Miller, T. A. et al. Conserv. Biol. 28, 745–755 (2014).

  23. 23.

    Drewitt, A. L. & Langston, R. Ibis 148, 29–42 (2006).

  24. 24.

    De Lucas, M., Janss, G. F. E., Whitfield, D. P. & Ferrer, M. J. Appl. Ecol. 45, 1695–1703 (2008).

  25. 25.

    Leddy, K. L., Higgins, K. F. & Naugle, D. E. Wilson Bull. 111, 100–104 (1999).

  26. 26.

    Pande, S. et al. J. Threat. Taxa 5, 3504–3515 (2013).

  27. 27.

    Rich, E. L. & Romero, L. M. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 288, R1628–R1636 (2005).

  28. 28.

    Agnew, R. C. N., Smith, V. J. & Fowkes, R. C. J. Wildl. Dis. 52, 459–467 (2016).

  29. 29.

    Thaker, M., Vanak, A. T., Lima, S. L. & Hews, D. K. Am. Nat. 175, 50–60 (2010).

  30. 30.

    Thaker, M., Lima, S. L. & Hews, D. K. Horm. Behav. 56, 51–57 (2009).

  31. 31.

    Ripple, W. J., Rooney, T. P. & Beschta, R. L. in Trophic Cascades: Predators, Prey, and the Changing Dynamics of Nature (eds Terborgh, J. & Estes, J.) 141–161 (Island Press, Washington DC, 2010).

  32. 32.

    Fraser, D. F., Gilliam, J. F., Akkara, J. T., Albanese, B. W. & Snider, S. B. Ecology 85, 312–319 (2004).

  33. 33.

    Jenkins, T. M., Diehl, S., Kratz, K. W. & Cooper, S. D. Ecology 80, 941–956 (1999).

  34. 34.

    Zambre, A. M. & Thaker, M. Anim. Behav. 127, 197–203 (2017).

  35. 35.

    Hill, G. E. Nature 350, 337–339 (1991).

  36. 36.

    Ruell, E. W. et al. Proc. R. Soc. B 280, 20122019 (2013).

  37. 37.

    Dale, J., Dey, C. J., Delhey, K., Kempenaers, B. & Valcu, M. Nature 527, 367–370 (2015).

  38. 38.

    Lutmerding, J. A., Rogosky, M., Peterjohn, B., McNicoll, J. & Bystrak, D. J. Rapt. Res. 46, 17–26 (2012).

  39. 39.

    Darimont, C. T., Fox, C. H., Bryan, H. M. & Reimchen, T. E. Science 349, 858–860 (2015).

  40. 40.

    Bosch, J., Staffell, I. & Hawkes, A. D. Energy 131, 207–217 (2017).

  41. 41.

    Decision Adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity at its Tenth Meeting. X/2. The Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011–2020 and the Aichi Biodiversity Targets (SCBD, 2010); https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-10/cop-10-dec-02-en.pdf

  42. 42.

    R Development Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2017).

  43. 43.

    Grimmett, R., Inskipp, C. & Inskipp, T. Birds of the Indian Subcontinent: India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh and the Maldives (Bloomsbury, London, 2013).

  44. 44.

    Rasmussen, P. C. & Anderton, J. C. Birds of South Asia: The Ripley Guide (Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History and Lynx Edicions, Washington DC, 2005).

  45. 45.

    Dodd, C. K. Reptile Ecology and Conservation (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2016).

  46. 46.

    Nopper, J., Lauströer, B., Rödel, M. O. & Ganzhorn, J. U. J. Appl. Ecol. 54, 480–488 (2017).

  47. 47.

    De Infante Anton, J. R., Rotger, A., Igual, J. M. & Tavecchia, G. Wildl. Res. 40, 552–560 (2014).

  48. 48.

    Wingfield, J. C., Vleck, C. M. & Moore, M. C. J. Exp. Zool. 264, 419–428 (1992).

  49. 49.

    Wada, H., Hahn, T. P. & Breuner, C. W. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 150, 405–413 (2007).

  50. 50.

    Blumstein, D. T. & Daniel, J. C. Proc. R. Soc. B 272, 1663–1668 (2005).

  51. 51.

    Samia, D. S. M., Blumstein, D. T., Stankowich, T. & Cooper, W. E. Biol. Rev. 91, 349–366 (2016).

  52. 52.

    Ydenberg, R. C. & Dill, L. M. Adv. Study Behav. 16, 229–249 (1986).

  53. 53.

    Peig, J. & Green, A. J. Oikos 118, 1883–1891 (2009).

  54. 54.

    Stevens, M., Parraga, C. A. & Cuthill, I. C. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 90, 211–237 (2007).

  55. 55.

    Endler, J. A. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 41, 315–352 (1990).

  56. 56.

    Grill, C. P. & Rush, V. N. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 69, 121–138 (2000).

  57. 57.

    Bergman, T. J. & Beehner, J. C. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 94, 231–240 (2008).

  58. 58.

    Kemp, D. J. et al. Am. Nat. 185, 705–724 (2015).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Maharashtra Forest Department for permits and Suzlon for allowing us to work on their property. We appreciate the logistical support provided by the Bhosale family in Satara, D. Gholap, and the Primary Health Centre in Thoseghar. We also thank N. Dandekar, G. Gowande, D. Joshi and R. Kashid for help in the field, A.K. Nageshkumar for remote sensing analysis, J. Endler for MatLab script, A. Ghatage for help with colour analyses and V. Giri for continued support. The Environmental Science Department of Fergusson College, Pune, provided partial support to H.B. during some of the bird surveys. Funding was provided by the MOEF-CC, DST-FIST and DBT-IISc partnership programme. Finally, we thank S.L. Lima, A.T. Vanak, K. Shanker and A. Batabyal for valuable comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

    • Amod Zambre

    Present address: Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, USA

  1. These authors contributed equally: Maria Thaker, Amod Zambre.

Affiliations

  1. Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India

    • Maria Thaker
    • , Amod Zambre
    •  & Harshal Bhosale

Authors

  1. Search for Maria Thaker in:

  2. Search for Amod Zambre in:

  3. Search for Harshal Bhosale in:

Contributions

M.T. and A.Z. conceived and designed the study, analysed the data and wrote the paper. H.B. conceived and designed the bird data collection. A.Z. and H.B. collected the data. M.T. contributed materials.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Thaker.

Supplementary information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0707-z