Sustainable replication and coevolution of cooperative RNAs in an artificial cell-like system

Abstract

Cooperation among independently replicating molecules is a key phenomenon that allowed the development of complexity during the early evolution of life. Generally, this process is vulnerable to parasitic or selfish entities, which can easily appear and destroy such cooperation. It remains unclear how this fragile cooperation process appeared and has been sustained through evolution. Theoretical studies have indicated that spatial structures, such as compartments, allow sustainable replication and the evolution of cooperative replication, although this has yet to be confirmed experimentally. In this study, we constructed a molecular cooperative replication system, in which two types of RNA, encoding replication or metabolic enzymes, cooperate for their replication in compartments, and we performed long-term replication experiments to examine the sustainability and evolution of the RNAs. We demonstrate that the cooperative relationship of the two RNAs could be sustained at a certain range of RNA concentrations, even when parasitic RNA appeared in the system. We also found that more efficient cooperative RNA replication evolved during long-term replication through seemingly selfish evolution of each RNA. Our results provide experimental evidence supporting the sustainability and robustness of molecular cooperation on an evolutionary timescale.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Computer simulation of cooperative RNA replication.
Fig. 2: TcCRR system.
Fig. 3: Long-term replication experiments.
Fig. 4: Template and cooperation activity of the RNA clones in the replicating population.
Fig. 5: Cooperative replication assay of the evolved RNAs.

References

  1. 1.

    Maynard-Smith, J. & Szathmáry, E. The Major Transitions in Evolution (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1997).

  2. 2.

    Nowak, M. A. Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science 314, 1560–1563 (2006).

  3. 3.

    Eigen, M. & Schuster, P. A principle of natural self-organization ‒ Part A: Emergence of the hypercycle. Naturwissenschaften 64, 541–565 (1977).

  4. 4.

    Niesert, U., Harnasch, D. & Bresch, C. Origin of life between Scylla and Charybdis. J. Mol. Evol. 17, 348–353 (1981).

  5. 5.

    Higgs, P. G. & Lehman, N. The RNA world: molecular cooperation at the origins of life. Nat. Rev. Genet. 16, 7–17 (2014).

  6. 6.

    Maynard Smith, J. Hypercycles and the origin of life. Nature 280, 445–446 (1979).

  7. 7.

    Szathmary, E. & Demeter, L. Group selection of early replicators and the origin of life. J. Theor. Biol. 128, 463–486 (1987).

  8. 8.

    Boerlijst, M. C. & Hogeweg, P. Spiral wave structure in pre-biotic evolution – hypercycles stable against parasites. Physica D 48, 17–28 (1991).

  9. 9.

    Hogeweg, P. Multilevel evolution – replicators and the evolution of diversity. Physica D 75, 275–291 (1994).

  10. 10.

    McCaskill, J. S., Fuchslin, R. M. & Altmeyer, S. The stochastic evolution of catalysts in spatially resolved molecular systems. Biol. Chem. 382, 1343–1363 (2001).

  11. 11.

    Hogeweg, P. & Takeuchi, N. Multilevel selection in models of prebiotic evolution: compartments and spatial self-organization. Orig. Life Evol. Biosph. 33, 375–403 (2003).

  12. 12.

    Takeuchi, N. & Hogeweg, P. The role of complex formation and deleterious mutations for the stability of RNA-like replicator systems. J. Mol. Evol. 65, 668–686 (2007).

  13. 13.

    Branciamore, S., Gallori, E., Szathmary, E. & Czaran, T. The origin of life: chemical evolution of a metabolic system in a mineral honeycomb? J. Mol. Evol. 69, 458–469 (2009).

  14. 14.

    Takeuchi, N. & Hogeweg, P. Multilevel selection in models of prebiotic evolution II: a direct comparison of compartmentalization and spatial self-organization. PLoS Comput. Biol. 5, e1000542 (2009).

  15. 15.

    Frank, S. A. The origin of synergistic symbiosis. J. Theoret. Biol. 176, 403–410 (1995).

  16. 16.

    Szabo, P., Scheuring, I., Czaran, T. & Szathmary, E. In silico simulations reveal that replicators with limited dispersal evolve towards higher efficiency and fidelity. Nature 420, 340–343 (2002).

  17. 17.

    Zintzaras, E., Santos, M. & Szathmáry, E. Selfishness versus functional cooperation in a stochastic protocell model. J. Theoret. Biol. 267, 605–613 (2010).

  18. 18.

    Attolini, C. S. O. & Stadler, P. F. Evolving towards the hypercycle: a spatial model of molecular evolution. Physica D 217, 134–141 (2006).

  19. 19.

    Lincoln, T. A. & Joyce, G. F. Self-sustained replication of an RNA enzyme. Science 323, 1229–1232 (2009).

  20. 20.

    Vaidya, N. et al. Spontaneous network formation among cooperative RNA replicators. Nature 491, 72–77 (2012).

  21. 21.

    Sievers, D. & von Kiedrowski, G. Self-replication of complementary nucleotide-based oligomers. Nature 369, 221–224 (1994).

  22. 22.

    Ellinger, T., Ehricht, R. & McCaskill, J. S. In vitro evolution of molecular cooperation in CATCH, a cooperatively coupled amplification system. Chem. Biol. 5, 729–741 (1998).

  23. 23.

    Lee, D. H., Severin, K., Yokobayashi, Y. & Ghadiri, M. R. Emergence of symbiosis in peptide self-replication through a hypercyclic network. Nature 390, 591–594 (1997).

  24. 24.

    Ichihashi, N. et al. Darwinian evolution in a translation-coupled RNA replication system within a cell-like compartment. Nat. Commun. 4, 2494 (2013).

  25. 25.

    Ichihashi, N., Aita, T., Motooka, D., Nakamura, S. & Yomo, T. Periodic pattern of genetic and fitness diversity during evolution of an artificial cell-like system. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 3205–3214 (2015).

  26. 26.

    Bansho, Y., Furubayashi, T., Ichihashi, N. & Yomo, T. Host-parasite oscillation dynamics and evolution in a compartmentalized RNA replication system. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 4045–4050 (2016).

  27. 27.

    Bansho, Y. et al. Importance of parasite RNA species repression for prolonged translation-coupled RNA self-replication. Chem. Biol. 19, 478–487 (2012).

  28. 28.

    Monnard, P. A. & Walde, P. Current ideas about prebiological compartmentalization. Life 5, 1239–1263 (2015).

  29. 29.

    Niesert, U. How many genes to start with? A computer simulation about the origin of life. Origins Life Evol. B 17, 155–169 (1987).

  30. 30.

    Palmenberg, A. & Kaesberg, P. Synthesis of complementary strands of heterologous RNAs with Qbeta replicase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 71, 1371–1375 (1974).

  31. 31.

    Feix, G. Primer-dependent copying of rabbit globin mRNA with Qbeta replicase. Nature 259, 593–594 (1976).

  32. 32.

    Usui, K., Ichihashi, N. & Yomo, T. A design principle for a single-stranded RNA genome that replicates with less double-strand formation. Nucl. Acids Res. 43, 8033–8043 (2015).

  33. 33.

    Garcia-Villada, L. & Drake, J. W. The three faces of riboviral spontaneous mutation: spectrum, mode of genome replication, and mutation rate. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002832 (2012).

  34. 34.

    Eigen, M., Mccaskill, J. & Schuster, P. Molecular quasi-species. J. Phys. Chem. 92, 6881–6891 (1988).

  35. 35.

    Mizuuchi, R., Ichihashi, N., Usui, K., Kazuta, Y. & Yomo, T. Adaptive evolution of an artificial RNA genome to a reduced ribosome environment. ACS Synth. Biol. 4, 292–298 (2015).

  36. 36.

    Shimizu, Y. et al. Cell-free translation reconstituted with purified components. Nat. Biotechnol. 19, 751–755 (2001).

  37. 37.

    Yumura, M. et al. Combinatorial selection for replicable RNA by Qbeta replicase while maintaining encoded gene function. PLoS ONE 12, e0174130 (2017).

  38. 38.

    Mizuuchi, R., Ichihashi, N. & Yomo, T. Adaptation and diversification of an RNA replication system under initiation- or termination-impaired translational conditions. ChemBioChem 17, 1229–1232 (2016).

  39. 39.

    Kazuta, Y., Matsuura, T., Ichihashi, N. & Yomo, T. Synthesis of milligram quantities of proteins using a reconstituted in vitro protein synthesis system. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 118, 554–557 (2014).

  40. 40.

    Hosoda, K. et al. Kinetic analysis of the entire RNA amplification process by Qβ replicase. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 15516–15527 (2007).

  41. 41.

    Ichihashi, N., Matsuura, T., Hosoda, K. & Yomo, T. Identification of two forms of Q{beta} replicase with different thermal stabilities but identical RNA replication activity. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 37210–37217 (2010).

  42. 42.

    Lorenz, R. et al. ViennaRNA package 2.0. Algor. Mol. Biol. 6, 26 (2011).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank N. Lehman, N. Takeuchi and T. Yomo for useful discussion and comments. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI grant numbers JP15KT0080 and JP15H04407.

Author information

R.M. designed and performed all experiments and wrote the manuscript. N.I. designed experiments and wrote the manuscript.

Correspondence to Norikazu Ichihashi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Discussion; Supplementary Figures 1–9; Supplementary Tables 1–5; Supplementary References

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Further reading