Brief Communication | Published:

Local management actions can increase coral resilience to thermally-induced bleaching

Nature Ecology & Evolutionvolume 2pages10751079 (2018) | Download Citation

Abstract

Recent large-scale analyses suggest that local management actions may not protect coral reefs from climate change, yet most local threat-reduction strategies have not been tested experimentally. We show that removing coral predators is a common local action used by managers across the world, and that removing the corallivorous snail Coralliophila abbreviata from Caribbean brain corals (Pseudodiploria and Diploria species) before a major warming event increased coral resilience by reducing bleaching severity (resistance) and post-bleaching tissue mortality (recovery). Our results highlight the need for increased evaluation and identification of local interventions that improve coral reef resilience.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Change history

  • 21 June 2018

    In the version of this Brief Communication originally published, the two instances of ‘natural-to-high’ in the sixth and seventh paragraphs were incorrect; they should have read ‘naturally high’.

References

  1. 1.

    Hughes, T. P. et al. Nature 546, 82–90 (2017).

  2. 2.

    Jackson, J. et al. Status and Trends of Caribbean Coral Reefs: 1970–2012 (Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network, IUCN, Gland, 2014).

  3. 3.

    De’ath, G. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 17995–17999 (2012).

  4. 4.

    Gunderson, L. H. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 31, 425–439 (2000).

  5. 5.

    Vega Thurber, R. L. et al. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 544–554 (2014).

  6. 6.

    Carilli, J. E. et al. PLoS ONE 4, e6324 (2009).

  7. 7.

    Zaneveld, J. R. et al. Nat. Commun. 7, 11833 (2016).

  8. 8.

    Hughes, T. P. et al. Nature 543, 373–377 (2017).

  9. 9.

    Bruno, J. F. & Valdivia, A. Sci. Rep. 6, 29778 (2016).

  10. 10.

    Levin, S. A.. & Lubchenco, J. BioScience 58, 27–32 (2008).

  11. 11.

    Normile, D. Science 352, 15–16 (2016).

  12. 12.

    van Oppen, M. J. H. et al. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 3437–3448 (2017).

  13. 13.

    Knowlton, N. & Jackson, J. B. C. PLoS Biol. 6, e54 (2008).

  14. 14.

    Williams, D. E. & Miller, M. W. Coral Reefs 31, 369–382 (2012).

  15. 15.

    Miller, M. W. Coral Reefs 19, 293–295 (2001).

  16. 16.

    Silliman, B. R. et al. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 44, 503–538 (2013).

  17. 17.

    Rotjan, R. D. & Lewis, S. M. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 367, 73–91 (2008).

  18. 18.

    Miller, A. C. Bull. Mar. Sci. 31, 932–934 (1981).

  19. 19.

    Baums, I. B., Miller, M. W. & Szmant, A. M. Mar. Biol. 142, 1083–1091 (2003).

  20. 20.

    Oren, U., Brickner, I. & Loya, Y. Proc. R. Soc. B 265, 2043–2050 (1998).

  21. 21.

    National Data Buoy Center Station MLRF1—Molasses Reef, FL (NOAA, 2014); http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=mlrf1

  22. 22.

    Manzello, D. P. Sci. Rep. 5, 16762 (2015).

  23. 23.

    Loya, Y. et al. Ecol. Lett. 4, 122–131 (2001).

  24. 24.

    Edmunds, P. J. Mar. Biol. 121, 137–142 (1994).

  25. 25.

    Mooney, C. The Great Barrier Reef is bleaching yet again, and scientists say only swift climate action can save it. Washington Post (15 March 2017).

  26. 26.

    Anthony, K. R. N. et al. Funct. Ecol. 23, 539–550 (2009).

  27. 27.

    Shaver, E. C. et al. Ecology 98, 830–839 (2017).

  28. 28.

    Recovery Plan: Elkhorn Coral (Acropora palmata) and Staghorn Coral (A. cervicornis) (National Marine Fisheries Service, Silver Spring, 2015).

  29. 29.

    McClanahan, T. R. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 115, 131–138 (1994).

  30. 30.

    Sweatman, H. Curr. Biol. 18, 598–599 (2008).

  31. 31.

    He, Q. et al. Ecol. Lett. 20, 194–201 (2017).

  32. 32.

    Ivlev, V. S. Experimental Ecology of the Feeding of Fishes (Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, 1961).

  33. 33.

    Christensen, R. H. B. ordinal—Regression Models for Ordinal Data. R package version 6–28 (2015).

  34. 34.

    R Development Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, 2016).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank S. Csik and C. Fuchs for fieldwork assistance and M. Hay for reviewing this manuscript. The National Science Foundation supported E.C.S. (GRFP DGE 1106401), D.E.B. (BIO-OCE 1130786) and B.R.S. (BIO-OCE 1056980). Duke University supported E.C.S. and B.R.S., and Florida International University and the University of California, Santa Barbara supported D.E.B. We thank The Nature Conservancy's Reef Resilience Program (P. MacGowan, K. Maize, C. Wagner, E. Mcleod), S. Wear, and the Lenfest Ocean Program for helping to inspire and conduct our manager survey work. Permits FKNMS-2014-081 and 2014-099 were obtained from the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary to conduct this research.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Division of Marine Science and Conservation, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Beaufort, NC, USA

    • Elizabeth C. Shaver
    •  & Brian R. Silliman
  2. Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA

    • Deron E. Burkepile
  3. Marine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA

    • Deron E. Burkepile

Authors

  1. Search for Elizabeth C. Shaver in:

  2. Search for Deron E. Burkepile in:

  3. Search for Brian R. Silliman in:

Contributions

The study was conceptualized by E.C.S., D.E.B. and B.R.S. The first draft of the paper was written by E.C.S. All authors contributed to editing subsequent drafts. E.C.S. conducted the predator density experiment. D.E.B. collected data on colony bleaching and mortality. E.C.S. analysed the data and created the figures.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth C. Shaver.

Supplementary information

  1. Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Tables 1–3; Supplementary Figures 1–3; Supplementary References

  2. Reporting Summary

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0589-0