Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Global mismatch of policy and research on drivers of biodiversity loss

Abstract

The United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development calls for urgent actions to reduce global biodiversity loss. Here, we synthesize >44,000 articles published in the past decade to assess the research focus on global drivers of loss. Relative research efforts on different drivers are not well aligned with their assessed impact, and multiple driver interactions are hardly considered. Research on drivers of biodiversity loss needs urgent realignment to match predicted severity and inform policy goals.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Trends in research on drivers of biodiversity loss.
Fig. 2: Alignment of research and policy with driver impact.

References

  1. 1.

    Butchart, S. H. et al. Science 328, 1164–1168 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (World Resources Institute, Washington DC, 2005).

  3. 3.

    Decision X/2: The Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011–2020 and the Aichi Biodiversity Targets (Convention on Biological Diversity, Nagoya, 2010).

  4. 4.

    Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development​ (United Nations General Assembly, 2015).

  5. 5.

    Duffy, J. E., Godwin, C. M. & Cardinale, B. J. Nature 549, 261–264 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Sala, O. E. et al. Science 287, 1770–1774 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Tilman, D. et al. Nature 546, 73–81 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Tittensor, D. P. et al. Science 346, 241–244 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    James, K. L., Randall, N. P. & Haddaway, N. R. Environ. Evid. 5, 7 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Veríssimo, D., MacMillan, D. C., Smith, R. J., Crees, J. & Davies, Z. G. Bioscience 64, 625–629 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    IPCC Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report (eds Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R. K. & Meyer L. A.) (IPCC, 2015).

  12. 12.

    Bellard, C., Bertelsmeier, C., Leadley, P., Thuiller, W. & Courchamp, F. Ecol. Lett. 15, 365–377 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Maxwell, S. L., Fuller, R. A., Brooks, T. M. & Watson, J. E. Nature 536, 143–145 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Pauly, D., Christensen, V., Dalsgaard, J., Froese, R. & Torres, F. Science 279, 860–863 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Global Biodiversity Outlook 4 — Summary and Conclusions (Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montréal, 2014).

  16. 16.

    Pereira, H. M. et al. Science 330, 1496–1501 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Brook, B. W., Sodhi, N. S. & Bradshaw, C. J. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 453–460 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Di Marco, M. et al. Conserv. Biol. 30, 189–195 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Brown, C. J., Saunders, M. I., Possingham, H. P. & Richardson, A. J. Divers. Distrib. 20, 538–546 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Carpenter, S. R. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 1305–1312 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Webb, T. J. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27, 535–541 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Approaches of the Preparation of the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework (Convention on Biological Diversity, 2017).

  23. 23.

    Foley, J. A. et al. Nature 478, 337–342 (2011).

  24. 24.

    Campbell Systematic Reviews: Protocol Template (The Campbell Collaboration, 2017).

  25. 25.

    R Development Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, 2017).

  26. 26.

    Gamer, M., Lemon, J., Fellows, I. & Singh, P. Package ‘irr’. Various Coefficients of Interrater Reliability and Agreement (2012).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the CSIRO Postdoctoral Fellowships that supported T.M., C.D., D.W.G. and M.D.M. We also thank R. C. Babcock, S. Ferrier, S. Kark and A. J. Richardson for providing critical feedback before submission. G. Stewart, C. Wordley and P. Batáry provided constructive assessments that improved the quality of the work.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

C.D. and T.M. initiated and led the working group. T.M., C.D., F.S., D.W.G., N.K., K.M. and V.G. designed the study. T.M. extracted the data. T.M. and D.W.G. analysed the data. T.M., C.D., F.S., D.W.G., N.K., K.M. and V.G. verified the model outputs. C.D. and T.M. co-wrote the paper. F.S., N.K., K.M., M.D.M. and V.G. significantly contributed to revisions.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Tessa Mazor or Christopher Doropoulos.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary methods, figures, tables, and references

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mazor, T., Doropoulos, C., Schwarzmueller, F. et al. Global mismatch of policy and research on drivers of biodiversity loss. Nat Ecol Evol 2, 1071–1074 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0563-x

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing