Comment | Published:

The Nagoya Protocol could backfire on the Global South

Nature Ecology & Evolutionvolume 2pages917919 (2018) | Download Citation

Regulations designed to prevent global inequalities in the use of genetic resources apply to both commercial and non-commercial research. Conflating the two may have unintended consequences for collaboration between the Global North and biodiverse countries in the Global South, which may promote global injustice rather than mitigate it.

  • Subscribe to Nature Ecology & Evolution for full access:



Additional access options:

Already a subscriber?  Log in  now or  Register  for online access.


  1. 1.

    Cock, M. Nature 467, 369 (2010).

  2. 2.

    Comizzoli, P. & Holt, W. V. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 28, 1145–1160 (2016).

  3. 3.

    Jinnah, S. & Jungcurt, S. Science 323, 464–465 (2009).

  4. 4.

    Martinez, S. I. & Biber-Klemm, S. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain 2, 27–33 (2010).

  5. 5.

    Schindel, D. E. Nature 467, 779–781 (2010).

  6. 6.

    Schindel, D. E. & du Plessis, P. Nature 515, 37 (2014).

  7. 7.

    Medaglia, J. C. in International Environmental Law and the Global South (eds Alam, S. et al.) 192–213 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2015).

  8. 8.

    Gross, T. National Study on ABS Implementation in Brazil (ABS Capacity Development Initiative, 2014);

  9. 9.

    Study to Analyse Legal and Economic Aspects of Implementing the Nagoya Protocol on ABS in the European Union (Institute for European Environmental Policy, 2012);

  10. 10.

    Dedeurwaerdere, T., Melindi-Ghidi, P. & Arianna, B. Environ. Sci. Policy 55, 1–10 (2016).

  11. 11.

    KFPE A Guide for Transboundary Research Partnerships 2nd edn (Swiss Commission for Research Partnerships with Developing Countries, 2014);

  12. 12.

    Biber-Klemm, S. & Martinez, S. I. in Research and Development on Genetic Resources—Public Domain Approaches in Implementing the Nagoya Protocol (eds Chege Kamau, E. et al.) 175–180 (Routledge, London, 2015).

  13. 13.

    Pogge, T. in World Poverty and Human Rights (ed. Pogge, T.) 202–221 (Polity Press, Cambridge, 2002).

  14. 14.

    Bleisch, B. & Schaber, P. Weltarmut und Ethik (Mentis, Paderborn, 2007).

  15. 15.

    Nijar, G. S., Louafi, S. & Welch, E. W. Int. Environ. Agreem. 17, 607–621 (2016).

Download references


We thank C. Schauz and S. I. Martinez for comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by the UZH Research Priority Program on ‘Global Change and Biodiversity’. F.A. was also supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant number PP00P3_150698).

Author information


  1. Ethics Research Institute (ERI), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    • Anna Deplazes-Zemp
    •  & Peter Schaber
  2. Department of Geography, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    • Samuel Abiven
    •  & Michael Schaepman
  3. Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    • Gabriela Schaepman-Strub
    • , Bernhard Schmid
    • , Kentaro K. Shimizu
    •  & Florian Altermatt
  4. Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Department of Aquatic Ecology, Duebendorf, Switzerland

    • Florian Altermatt


  1. Search for Anna Deplazes-Zemp in:

  2. Search for Samuel Abiven in:

  3. Search for Peter Schaber in:

  4. Search for Michael Schaepman in:

  5. Search for Gabriela Schaepman-Strub in:

  6. Search for Bernhard Schmid in:

  7. Search for Kentaro K. Shimizu in:

  8. Search for Florian Altermatt in:

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Deplazes-Zemp.

About this article

Publication history



Rights and permissions

To obtain permission to re-use content from this article visit RightsLink.