Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Intergenerational equity can help to prevent climate change and extinction

Nature Ecology & Evolution volume 2, pages 204–207 (2018)Cite this article

Subjects

An Author Correction to this article was published on 28 March 2018

This article has been updated

Intergenerational rights to a healthy environment are protected by the constitutions of 74% of the world’s nations. These explicit commitments and similar, ancient principles of sovereign public trust are often overlooked but, if enforced, they offer sustainable protection for the biosphere.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Categories of constitutional provisions for environmental protection2.
Fig. 2: Global atmospheric CO2 emissions by category of constitutional provisions for environmental protection.
Fig. 3: Bird and mammal diversity by category of constitutional provisions for environmental protection.

Change history

  • 28 March 2018

    The original Article mistakenly coded the constitutional rights of Australia as containing a governmental duty to protect the environment (blue in the figures); this has been corrected to containing no explicit mention of environmental protection (orange in the figures). The original Article also neglected to code the constitutional rights of the Cayman Islands (no data; yellow in the figures); this has been corrected to containing a governmental duty to protect the environment (blue in the figures).

    Although no inferences changed as a result of these errors, many values changed slightly and have been corrected. The proportion of the world’s nations having constitutional rights to a healthy environment changed from 75% to 74%. The proportions of nations in different categories given in the Fig. 1 caption all changed except purple countries (3.1%): green countries changed from 47.2% to 46.9%; blue countries changed from 24.4% to 24.2%; and orange countries changed from 25.3% to 25.8%. The proportion of the global atmospheric CO2 emitted by the 144 nations changed from 72.6% to 74.4%; the proportion of the world’s population represented by the 144 nations changed from 84.9% to 85%. The values of annual average CO2 emissions for blue countries changed from 363,000 Gg to 353,000 Gg and for orange countries from 195,000 Gg to 201,000 Gg. The proportion of threatened mammals endemic to a single country represented by the 144 countries changed from 91% to 84%. Figures 1–3 have been updated to show the correct values and map colours and the Supplementary Information has been updated to give the correct country codes.

References

  1. Boyd, D. R. RECIEL 20, 171–179 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boyd, D. R. The Status of Constitutional Protection for the Environment in Other Nations (The David Suzuki Foundation, Vancouver, 2013).

  3. Blumm, M. C. & Wood, M. C. Am. Univ. Law Rev. 67, 1–83 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Overview: CO 2 Time Series 1990–2015 per Region/Country (European Commission, 2016); http://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/overview.php?v=CO2ts1990-2015&sort=des9

  5. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (International Union for the Conservation of Nature, Gland, 2017).

  6. Treves, A. et al. Biol. Rev. 92, 248–270 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Borrows, J. Recovering Canada: The Resurgence of Indigenous Law (Univ. Toronto Press, Toronto, 2017).

  8. Chapron, G., Epstein, Y., Trouwborst, A. & López-Bao, J. V. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0086 (2017).

  9. Oxford English Dictionary (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2017); http://www.oed.com.ezproxy.library.wisc.edu/

  10. Illinois Central Railroad v Illinois, 146 US 387 (US Supreme Court, 1892).

  11. Bruskotter, J. T., Enzler, S. & Treves, A. Science 333, 1828–1829 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wood, M. C. Nature’s Trust (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2014).

  13. Juliana et al. v USA (US District Court Oregon, 2016).

  14. Bruskotter, J. T., Enzler, S. & Treves, A. Science 335, 795 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kolowich, S. The water next time: professor who helped expose crisis in Flint says public science is broken. Chronicle of Higher Education (2 February 2016); http://chronicle.com/article/The-Water-Next-Time-Professor/235136

  16. López-Bao, J. V., Chapron, G. & Treves, A. Biol. Conserv. 212, 139–143 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Open Standards for the Practice of Conservation Version 3.0 (Conservation Measures Partnership, 2015); http://cmp-openstandards.org/

  18. Sax, J. L. Mich. Law Rev. 68, 471–566 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. World Development Indicators (World Bank, 2017); http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=2&type=metadata&series=SP.POP.TOTL

  20. Mbabazi et al. v The Attorney General (The High Court of Uganda Holden at Kampala, 2012).

  21. Robinson Township, Washington County et al. v Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al., 523 Pa. 564, 19 December 2013 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania 2012).

  22. Isabel Kain et al. v Department of Environmental Protection (Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, 2016).

  23. The Status of Climate Litigation: A Global Review (United Nations Environment Programme and Sabin Center for Climate Change Law, Columbia University, New York, accessed 9 December 2017); http://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/20767

Download references

Acknowledgements

D. Bantlin, M. Rabenhorst and R. Treves helped with data and illustrations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA

    Adrian Treves & Francisco J. Santiago-Ávila

  2. Earth to Ocean Research Group, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, British Columbia, V5A 1S6, Canada

    Kyle A. Artelle

  3. Raincoast Conservation Foundation, Sidney, British Columbia, PO Box 2429, V8L 3Y3, Canada

    Kyle A. Artelle, Chris T. Darimont & Paul Paquet

  4. Hakai Institute, Heriot Bay, British Columbia, PO Box 309, V0P 1H0, Canada

    Kyle A. Artelle, Chris T. Darimont & Paul Paquet

  5. Department of Geography, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, PO Box 1700, Stn CSC, V8W 2Y2, Canada

    Chris T. Darimont

  6. George Perkins Marsh Institute, Clark University, Worcester, MA, 01610-1477, USA

    William S. Lynn

  7. The Reynolds Law Firm, PC, 225 SW Fourth St, Corvallis, OR, 97333, USA

    Rance Shaw

  8. School of Law, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, 97403, USA

    Mary C. Wood

Authors
  1. Adrian Treves
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kyle A. Artelle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chris T. Darimont
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. William S. Lynn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Paul Paquet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Francisco J. Santiago-Ávila
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Rance Shaw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Mary C. Wood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adrian Treves.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

A correction to this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0512-8.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary data for Figs 1–3

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Treves, A., Artelle, K.A., Darimont, C.T. et al. Intergenerational equity can help to prevent climate change and extinction. Nat Ecol Evol 2, 204–207 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0465-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0465-y

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing