Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Intergenerational equity can help to prevent climate change and extinction

An Author Correction to this article was published on 28 March 2018

This article has been updated

Intergenerational rights to a healthy environment are protected by the constitutions of 74% of the world’s nations. These explicit commitments and similar, ancient principles of sovereign public trust are often overlooked but, if enforced, they offer sustainable protection for the biosphere.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Categories of constitutional provisions for environmental protection2.
Fig. 2: Global atmospheric CO2 emissions by category of constitutional provisions for environmental protection.
Fig. 3: Bird and mammal diversity by category of constitutional provisions for environmental protection.

Change history

  • 28 March 2018

    The original Article mistakenly coded the constitutional rights of Australia as containing a governmental duty to protect the environment (blue in the figures); this has been corrected to containing no explicit mention of environmental protection (orange in the figures). The original Article also neglected to code the constitutional rights of the Cayman Islands (no data; yellow in the figures); this has been corrected to containing a governmental duty to protect the environment (blue in the figures).

    Although no inferences changed as a result of these errors, many values changed slightly and have been corrected. The proportion of the world’s nations having constitutional rights to a healthy environment changed from 75% to 74%. The proportions of nations in different categories given in the Fig. 1 caption all changed except purple countries (3.1%): green countries changed from 47.2% to 46.9%; blue countries changed from 24.4% to 24.2%; and orange countries changed from 25.3% to 25.8%. The proportion of the global atmospheric CO2 emitted by the 144 nations changed from 72.6% to 74.4%; the proportion of the world’s population represented by the 144 nations changed from 84.9% to 85%. The values of annual average CO2 emissions for blue countries changed from 363,000 Gg to 353,000 Gg and for orange countries from 195,000 Gg to 201,000 Gg. The proportion of threatened mammals endemic to a single country represented by the 144 countries changed from 91% to 84%. Figures 1–3 have been updated to show the correct values and map colours and the Supplementary Information has been updated to give the correct country codes.

References

  1. 1.

    Boyd, D. R. RECIEL 20, 171–179 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Boyd, D. R. The Status of Constitutional Protection for the Environment in Other Nations (The David Suzuki Foundation, Vancouver, 2013).

  3. 3.

    Blumm, M. C. & Wood, M. C. Am. Univ. Law Rev. 67, 1–83 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Overview: CO 2 Time Series 1990–2015 per Region/Country (European Commission, 2016); http://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/overview.php?v=CO2ts1990-2015&sort=des9

  5. 5.

    The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (International Union for the Conservation of Nature, Gland, 2017).

  6. 6.

    Treves, A. et al. Biol. Rev. 92, 248–270 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Borrows, J. Recovering Canada: The Resurgence of Indigenous Law (Univ. Toronto Press, Toronto, 2017).

  8. 8.

    Chapron, G., Epstein, Y., Trouwborst, A. & López-Bao, J. V. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0086 (2017).

  9. 9.

    Oxford English Dictionary (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2017); http://www.oed.com.ezproxy.library.wisc.edu/

  10. 10.

    Illinois Central Railroad v Illinois, 146 US 387 (US Supreme Court, 1892).

  11. 11.

    Bruskotter, J. T., Enzler, S. & Treves, A. Science 333, 1828–1829 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Wood, M. C. Nature’s Trust (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2014).

  13. 13.

    Juliana et al. v USA (US District Court Oregon, 2016).

  14. 14.

    Bruskotter, J. T., Enzler, S. & Treves, A. Science 335, 795 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Kolowich, S. The water next time: professor who helped expose crisis in Flint says public science is broken. Chronicle of Higher Education (2 February 2016); http://chronicle.com/article/The-Water-Next-Time-Professor/235136

  16. 16.

    López-Bao, J. V., Chapron, G. & Treves, A. Biol. Conserv. 212, 139–143 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Open Standards for the Practice of Conservation Version 3.0 (Conservation Measures Partnership, 2015); http://cmp-openstandards.org/

  18. 18.

    Sax, J. L. Mich. Law Rev. 68, 471–566 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    World Development Indicators (World Bank, 2017); http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=2&type=metadata&series=SP.POP.TOTL

  20. 20.

    Mbabazi et al. v The Attorney General (The High Court of Uganda Holden at Kampala, 2012).

  21. 21.

    Robinson Township, Washington County et al. v Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al., 523 Pa. 564, 19 December 2013 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania 2012).

  22. 22.

    Isabel Kain et al. v Department of Environmental Protection (Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, 2016).

  23. 23.

    The Status of Climate Litigation: A Global Review (United Nations Environment Programme and Sabin Center for Climate Change Law, Columbia University, New York, accessed 9 December 2017); http://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/20767

Download references

Acknowledgements

D. Bantlin, M. Rabenhorst and R. Treves helped with data and illustrations.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adrian Treves.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

A correction to this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0512-8.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary data for Figs 1–3

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Treves, A., Artelle, K.A., Darimont, C.T. et al. Intergenerational equity can help to prevent climate change and extinction. Nat Ecol Evol 2, 204–207 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0465-y

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing