Article

Soil biota contributions to soil aggregation

  • Nature Ecology & Evolution 118281835 (2017)
  • doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0344-y
  • Download Citation
Received:
Accepted:
Published online:

Abstract

Humankind depends on the sustainability of soils for its survival and well-being. Threatened by a rapidly changing world, our soils suffer from degradation and biodiversity loss, making it increasingly important to understand the role of soil biodiversity in soil aggregation—a key parameter for soil sustainability. Here, we provide evidence of the contribution of soil biota to soil aggregation on macro- and microaggregate scales, and evaluate how specific traits, soil biota groups and species interactions contribute to this. We conducted a global meta-analysis comprising 279 soil biota species. Our study shows a clear positive effect of soil biota on soil aggregation, with bacteria and fungi generally appearing to be more important for soil aggregation than soil animals. Bacteria contribute strongly to both macro- and microaggregates while fungi strongly affect macroaggregation. Motility, body size and population density were important traits modulating effect sizes. Investigating species interactions across major taxonomic groups revealed their beneficial impact on soil aggregation. At the broadest level, our results highlight the need to consider biodiversity as a causal factor in soil aggregation. This will require a shift from the current management and physicochemical perspective to an approach that fully embraces the significance of soil organisms, their diversity and interactions.

  • Subscribe to Nature Ecology & Evolution for full access:

    $99

    Subscribe

Additional access options:

Already a subscriber?  Log in  now or  Register  for online access.

References

  1. 1.

    Healthy Soils Are the Basis for Healthy Food Production (FAO, Rome, 2015).

  2. 2.

    Lal, R. Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science 304, 1623–1627 (2004).

  3. 3.

    Wall, D. H., Nielsen, U. N. & Six, J. Soil biodiversity and human health. Nature 528, 69–76 (2015).

  4. 4.

    Diamond, J. Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed (Penguin, New York, 2011).

  5. 5.

    Dindal, D. L. Soil Biology Guide (Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, 1990).

  6. 6.

    Bronick, C. J. & Lal, R. Soil structure and management: a review.Geoderma 124, 3–22 (2005).

  7. 7.

    Rillig, M. C. & Mummey, D. L. Mycorrhizas and soil structure. New Phytol. 171, 41–53 (2006).

  8. 8.

    Tisdall, J. M. & Oades, J. M. Organic-matter and water-stable aggregates in soils. J. Soil Sci. 33, 141–163 (1982).

  9. 9.

    Wagg, C., Bender, S. F., Widmer, F. & van der Heijden, M. G. A. Soil biodiversity and soil community composition determine ecosystem multifunctionality. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 5266–5270 (2014).

  10. 10.

    Delgado-Baquerizo, M. et al. Circular linkages between soil biodiversity, fertility and plant productivity are limited to topsoil at the continental scale. New Phytol. 215, 1186–1196 (2017).

  11. 11.

    Lehmann, A., Leifheit, E. F. & Rillig, M. C. in Mycorrhizal Mediation of Soil—Fertility, Structure, and Carbon Storage (eds Johnson, N. Gehring, C. & Jansa, J.) Ch. 14 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2016).

  12. 12.

    Six, J., Bossuyt, H., Degryze, S. & Denef, K. A history of research on the link between (micro)aggregates, soil biota, and soil organic matter dynamics. Soil Till. Res. 79, 7–31 (2004).

  13. 13.

    Chenu, C. Influence of a fungal polysaccharide, scleroglucan, on clay microstructure. Soil Biol. Biochem. 21, 299–305 (1989).

  14. 14.

    Deng, J. Z. et al. Synergistic effects of soil microstructure and bacterial EPS on drying rate in emulated soil micromodels. Soil Biol. Biochem. 83, 116–124 (2015).

  15. 15.

    Degens, B. P. Macro-aggregation of soils by biological bonding and binding mechanisms and the factors affecting these: a review. Aust. J. Soil Res. 35, 431–459 (1997).

  16. 16.

    Blanchart, E. et al. SWORM: an agent-based model to simulate the effect of earthworms on soil structure. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 60, 13–21 (2009).

  17. 17.

    Leifheit, E. F., Verbruggen, E. & Rillig, M. C. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi reduce decomposition of woody plant litter while increasing soil aggregation. Soil Biol. Biochem. 81, 323–328 (2015).

  18. 18.

    Siddiky, M. R. K., Schaller, J., Caruso, T. & Rillig, M. C. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and collembola non-additively increase soil aggregation. Soil Biol. Biochem. 47, 93–99 (2012).

  19. 19.

    Leifheit, E. F., Veresoglou, S. D., Lehmann, A., Morris, E. K. & Rillig, M. C. Multiple factors influence the role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in soil aggregation—a meta-analysis. Plant Soil 374, 523–537 (2014).

  20. 20.

    Miller, R. M. & Jastrow, J. D. in Mycorrhizae in Sustainable Agriculture (eds Bethlenfalvayand, C. J. & Linderman, R. G.) 29–44 (Soil Science Society of America, Madison, 1992).

  21. 21.

    Tisdall, J. M., Smith, S. E. & Rengasamy, P. Aggregation of soil by fungal hyphae. Aust. J. Soil Res. 35, 55–60 (1997).

  22. 22.

    Marshall, K. C. Interfaces in Microbial Ecology (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1976).

  23. 23.

    Hattori, T. Microbial Life in Soil (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1973).

  24. 24.

    Belnap, J. & Gardner, J. S. Soil microstructure in soils of the Colorado Plateau—the role of the cyanobacterium Microcoleus vaginatus. Great Basin Nat. 53, 40–47 (1993).

  25. 25.

    Smith, S. M., Abed, R. M. M. & Garcia-Pichel, F. Biological soil crusts of sand dunes in Cape Cod National Seashore, Massachusetts, USA. Microb. Ecol. 48, 200–208 (2004).

  26. 26.

    Santaella, C., Schue, M., Berge, O., Heulin, T. & Achouak, W. The exopolysaccharide of Rhizobium sp. YAS34 is not necessary for biofilm formation on Arabidopsis thaliana and Brassica napus roots but contributes to root colonization. Environ. Microbiol. 10, 2150–2163 (2008).

  27. 27.

    Brown, L., Wolf, J. M., Prados-Rosales, R. & Casadevall, A. Through the wall: extracellular vesicles in gram-positive bacteria, mycobacteria and fungi. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 13, 620–630 (2015).

  28. 28.

    Eisenhauer, N. The action of an animal ecosystem engineer: identification of the main mechanisms of earthworm impacts on soil microarthropods. Pedobiologia 53, 343–352 (2010).

  29. 29.

    Lee, K. E. Earthworms: Their Ecology and Relationships with Soils and Land Use (Academic, Cambridge, 1985).

  30. 30.

    Pijper, A. in Ergebnisse der Mikrobiologie, Immunitätsforschung und Experimentellen Therapie (eds Kikuth, W. et al.) 37–95 (Springer, Heidelberg, 1957).

  31. 31.

    Quillin, K. J. Ontogenetic scaling of hydrostatic skeletons: geometric, static stress and dynamic stress scaling of the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris. J. Exp. Biol. 201, 1871–1883 (1998).

  32. 32.

    Tan, Y., Gannon, J. T., Baveye, P. & Alexander, M. Transport of bacteria in an aquifer sand—experiments and model simulations. Water Resour. Res. 30, 3243–3252 (1994).

  33. 33.

    Lehmann, A. & Rillig, M. C. Understanding mechanisms of soil biota involvement in soil aggregation: a way forward with saprobic fungi? Soil Biol. Biochem. 88, 298–302 (2015).

  34. 34.

    De Graaff, M. A., Adkins, J., Kardol, P. & Throop, H. L. A meta-analysis of soil biodiversity impacts on the carbon cycle. Soil 1, 257–271 (2015).

  35. 35.

    Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G. & Group, T. P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann. Intern. Med. 151, 264–269 (2009).

  36. 36.

    Bender, S. F., Wagg, C. & van der Heijden, M. G. A. An underground revolution: biodiversity and soil ecological engineering for agricultural sustainability. Trends Ecol. Evol. 31, 440–452 (2016).

  37. 37.

    Copas, J. & Shi, J. Q. Meta-analysis, funnel plots and sensitivity analysis. Biostatistics 1, 247–262 (2000).

  38. 38.

    Bardgett, R. D. The Biology of Soil: A Community and Ecosystem Approach 1st edn (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2005).

  39. 39.

    Veresoglou, S. D., Halley, J. M. & Rillig, M. C. Extinction risk of soil biota. Nat. Commun. 6, 8862 (2015).

  40. 40.

    Kemper, W. D. & Rosenau, R. C. Aggregate Stability and Size Distribution (American Society of Agronomy, Madison, 1986).

  41. 41.

    Anderson, J. T. Plant fitness in a rapidly changing world. New Phytol. 210, 81–87 (2016).

  42. 42.

    R Development Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, 2014).

  43. 43.

    Viechtbauer, W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J. Stat. Softw. 36, 1–48 (2010).

  44. 44.

    Revell, L. J. Phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 217–223 (2012).

  45. 45.

    Lajeunesse, M. J. Facilitating systematic reviews, data extraction, and meta-analysis with the metagear package for R. Methods Ecol. Evol 7, 323–330 (2016).

  46. 46.

    Canty, A. & Ripley, B. Boot: Bootstrap R (S-Plus) Functions. R package version 1.3-18 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, 2015).

  47. 47.

    Knapp, G. & Hartung, J. Improved tests for a random effects meta-regression with a single covariate. Stat. Med. 22, 2693–2710 (2003).

  48. 48.

    Borenstein, M. & Higgins, J. P. T. Meta-analysis and subgroups. Prev. Sci. 14, 134–143 (2013).

  49. 49.

    Sterne, J. A. C. & Egger, M. Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 54, 1046–1055 (2001).

  50. 50.

    Becker, R. A., Wilks, A. R., Brownrigg, R., Minka, T. P. & Deckmyn, A. maps: Draw Geographical Maps. Version (3.2.0) (2016); https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/maps/index.html.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Antonovics for input on this paper. A.L. and M.C.R. acknowledge funding from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grant number RI 1815/16-1). M.C.R. additionally acknowledges funding from a European Research Council Advanced Grant (694368) and the Federal Ministry for Education and Research-funded project INPLAMINT.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Institut für Biologie, Plant Ecology, Freie Universität Berlin, Altensteinstr. 6, D-14195, Berlin, Germany

    • Anika Lehmann
    •  & Matthias C. Rillig
  2. Berlin-Brandenburg Institute of Advanced Biodiversity Research, D-14195, Berlin, Germany

    • Anika Lehmann
    •  & Matthias C. Rillig
  3. College of Marine Science, Shandong University, Wenhuan West Road 180, C-264209, Weihai, Shandong, China

    • Weishuang Zheng

Authors

  1. Search for Anika Lehmann in:

  2. Search for Weishuang Zheng in:

  3. Search for Matthias C. Rillig in:

Contributions

A.L. designed and performed the research; W.Z. contributed analytical tools; A.L. and M.C.R. wrote the manuscript; all authors contributed to the final version of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anika Lehmann.

Electronic supplementary material

  1. Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Tables 1–4, Supplementary Figures 1–21, Supplementary References

  2. Life sciences reporting summary.

    Life sciences reporting summary.

  3. Supplementary Data

    Single Taxa dataset, Interacting Taxa dataset.